Platform-dependent advantages and challenges of laboratory stellar-opacity measurements
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Loisel, Guillaume Pascal.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Opacity-on-NIF has obtained opacity data under conditions similar to those achieved by the entirely different Opacity-on-Z platform. From low- and high-Z elements at different anchor points, rigorously compare the opacity data between the laboratories and to multiple opacity theory models. Compare and assess the data acquisition and processing methods for obtaining opacities and for measuring/inferring sample conditions. Explain, or develop hypotheses for, any discrepancies. Map progress to the National Opacity Strategy and define future directions.
Accurate understanding of x-ray diagnostics is crucial for both interpreting high-energy-density experiments and testing simulations through quantitative comparisons. X-ray diagnostic models are complex. Past treatments of individual x-ray diagnostics on a case-by-case basis have hindered universal diagnostic understanding. Here, in this study, we derive a general formula for modeling the absolute response of non-focusing x-ray diagnostics, such as x-ray imagers, one-dimensional space-resolved spectrometers, and x-ray power diagnostics. The present model is useful for both data modeling and data processing. It naturally accounts for the x-ray crystal broadening. The new model verifies that standard approaches for a crystal response can be good approximations, but they can underestimate the total reflectivity and overestimate spectral resolving power by more than a factor of 2 in some cases near reflectivity edge features. We also find that a frequently used, simplified-crystal-response approximation for processing spectral data can introduce an absolute error of more than an order of magnitude and the relative spectral radiance error of a factor of 3. The present model is derived with straightforward geometric arguments. It is more general and is recommended for developing a unified picture and providing consistent treatment over multiple x-ray diagnostics. Such consistency is crucial for reliable multi-objective data analyses.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.