Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Lousteau, Angela L.

Publications and source records attributed to Lousteau, Angela L..

3 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

VERIFICATION MEASUREMENTS OF THE MASS AND ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM OXIDE CARD SOURCES

Measurements were performed to determine the mass and enrichment of 10 uranium oxide (U3O8) card sources. The measurements and analysis were completed as a verification of the card sources in support of Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s nuclear material control and accountability program. Although these cards are not nationally accredited as a nuclear standard, they are used as a working reference for measurements, such as holdup. The uranium card source measurements were taken with a broad energy germanium detector and the Genie 2000 Gamma Acquisition and Analysis software. A complete characterization of each of the 10 uranium card sources was performed using the 4 characteristic full energy peaks of 235U. Using the In Situ Object Counting System software to determine the mathematical efficiency of the measurement, the mass of 235U in each card was determined. The 235U mass in each card ranged from 10.42 to 12.63 g with a systematic error between 0.76 and 0.95 g and a random error of 0.01 g for each card source. The Multi-Group Analysis for Uranium (MGAU) software and the Fixed-Energy, Response Function Analysis with Multiple Efficiency (FRAM) isotopic analysis software were used to determine the isotopic composition of the uranium cards. The measured enrichment was compared to the declared enrichment for each card, with uncertainties ranging from 2.7% to 4.3% for the MGAU analysis and 2.3% to 4.1% for the FRAM analysis. This is a good example of how a well-benchmarked mathematical calibration method can be useful in characterizing uranium sources.

Hunneke, Rachel↗
DOE OSTI2020

Workshop on Improving Holdup Monitoring in the US

The characterization and quantification of nuclear deposits, or residual nuclear material retained in process equipment, generally referred to as holdup, continues to challenge nuclear processing facilities in DOE program areas such as nuclear criticality safety, material control and accountability, environmental management. The efficiency and effectiveness of nuclear operations in these facilities depends heavily on the results from nondestructive techniques designed to measure nuclear materials in situ. The traditional methods used to measure holdup were established more than 30 years ago and assume unrealistic conditions for most measurement cases. These blind, in situ measurements present unique challenges due to the following attributes: unique, non-ideal geometries; unknown deposit thicknesses; lack of representative calibration standards; large number of holdup deposit locations; and poor accessibility for many measurement locations. These difficulties and the poor assumptions made to handle them have resulted in measurement uncertainties that are often too large for many programs to effectively utilize. In an effort to address and identify solutions to the current holdup challenges facing the US nuclear industry, Oak Ridge National Laboratory hosted the Technical Workshop on Improving Holdup Monitoring in the US. The two-day workshop held August 21–22, 2019, was attended by 35 holdup measurement practitioners, program managers, stakeholders from US Department of Energy sites, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and representatives from commercial industry. The primary objectives were to identify critical elements of a successful and defensible holdup measurement program; identify technical challenges, needs, and potential improvements associated with measurement of holdup; and share best practices and lessons learned from recent accumulation events. Fourteen presentations were delivered on holdup topics including necessary elements for effective program management, measurement needs, emerging technologies and other measurement solutions, and lessons learned from recent events. These presentations highlighted best practices related to accumulation monitoring, considerations and proactive steps to facilitate holdup in new facility designs, imaging solutions to improve holdup assumptions, and new software developed in support of holdup measurements. Breakout sessions were also employed to determine additional needs and identify potential solutions to common holdup challenges. The primary discussions focused on causes and prevention of material accumulations, needs for uranium and plutonium measurements, and reduction of measurement uncertainty, all of which were explicitly identified as critical needs during the 2018 Workshop on Technical and Programmatic Needs for a Sustainable NDA Program for the US DOE.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗