Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Luis S Fernandes

Publications and source records attributed to Luis S Fernandes.

13 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

Fan Noise Predictions of the NASA Source Diagnostic Test Using Unsteady Simulations with LAVA Part I: Near-Field Aerodynamics and Turbulence

A sliding mesh technique within the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) computational framework is validated using the experimental dataset collected as part of the NASA Source Diagnostic Test (SDT) campaign. Two modeling approaches are explored: the unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (URANS) with Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model closure, and a hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation (RANS/LES) paradigm employing a Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation (ZDES) closure with enhanced shielding protection. Fan stage performance metrics, aerodynamic quantities and turbulent flow structures are analyzed in this work. Initial studies focusing on grid and time-step sensitivity are presented. Sensitivity to different variants of the SA turbulence model is analyzed, supporting the use of the baseline SA model in the production runs. Two conditions are analyzed in detail using URANS and hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES). Mean flow quantities are well-captured by both methods in the low-speed (approach) regime. While URANS misses all the upstream-propagating noise in the inlet due to the rotor-locked tones being evanescent in nature at subsonic fan tip speeds, HRLES captures this broadband component in its pressure field. At the high-speed (sideline) condition, URANS shows better agreement with the SDT data than HRLES in the interstage flow-field. In this regime, URANS captures the tonal content propagating through the inlet, since the tones are now cut-on. Both methods are suitable to capture fan stage performance metrics and mean flow quantities, but only HRLES is able to resolve the fine turbulent structures responsible for broadband noise. The results support the use of the sliding mesh technique implemented in this work for future turbomachinery applications within the LAVA solver framework.

AATT↗
NASA NTRS2023

Fan Noise Predictions of the NASA Source Diagnostic Test Using Unsteady Simulations with LAVA Part I: Near-Field Aerodynamics and Turbulence

A sliding mesh technique within the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) computational framework is validated using the experimental dataset collected as part of the NASA Source Diagnostic Test (SDT) campaign. Two modeling approaches are explored: the unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (URANS) with Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model closure, and a hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation (RANS/LES) paradigm employing a Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation (ZDES) closure with enhanced shielding protection. Fan stage performance metrics, aerodynamic quantities and turbulent flow structures are analyzed in this work. Initial studies focusing on grid and time-step sensitivity are presented. Sensitivity to different variants of the SA turbulence model is analyzed, supporting the use of the baseline SA model in the production runs. Two conditions are analyzed in detail using URANS and hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES). Mean flow quantities are well-captured by both methods in the low-speed (approach) regime. While URANS misses all the upstream-propagating noise in the inlet due to the rotor-locked tones being evanescent in nature at subsonic fan tip speeds, HRLES captures this broadband component in its pressure field. At the high-speed (sideline) condition, URANS shows better agreement with the SDT data than HRLES in the interstage flow-field. In this regime, URANS captures the tonal content propagating through the inlet, since the tones are now cut-on. Both methods are suitable to capture fan stage performance metrics and mean flow quantities, but only HRLES is able to resolve the fine turbulent structures responsible for broadband noise. The results support the use of the sliding mesh technique implemented in this work for future turbomachinery applications within the LAVA solver framework.

AATT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Computational Aerodynamic Analysis in Support of the CRM Tail Cone Thruster Configuration Wind Tunnel Test

NASA’s Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) project is breaching the boundaries of aircraft design in pursuit of eco-friendly solutions that are compatible with urban noise comfort levels. Boundary layer ingesting (BLI) propulsion systems promise to reduce fuel burn with additional potential benefits in noise reduction. Type-II BLI systems of the STARC-ABL type are the subject of a test campaign planned for fiscal year 2022 in the National Transonic Facility (NTF), for which a CRM-based model with a retrofitted tail cone thruster (TCT) has been designed. The present work is a precursor to the NTF test, where the 240 cases planned for the experiment were simulated using the Launch, Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA)computational framework. Solution sensitivity to angle of attack, engine operating conditions, and the presence of the supporting structure (sting) in the wind tunnel test are analyzed in the extensive dataset. The main flow features contributing to the inlet distortion are identified as the vertical tail wake, wing downwash and fuselage upsweep vortices, with the latter two experiencing the greatest sensitivity to angle of attack. Finally, results from an inlet-guide-vane(IGV) design/integration study are presented. The LAVA team and the turbomachinery design team at NASA’s Ames and Glenn Research Centers are collaborating in an effort to reduce flow distortion upstream of the fan by means of integrating an IGV system into the CRM-TCT model. A significant improvement in flow distortion metrics has been achieved since the initial design iteration. Results employing an actuator zone model with realistic radially-varying thrust profiles to simulate first-order fan effects within LAVA are presented.

AATT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High-Lift Common Research Model: RANS, HRLES and WMLES Perspectives for CLmax Prediction Using LAVA

A unified assessment of three turbulence treatments: Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes(RANS), Hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES) and Equilibrium Wall-Modelled Large Eddy Simulation(WMLES) is presented for the High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). For the free-air configuration, steady-state RANS simulations show very accurate drag polar predictions in the low-𝛼linear regime. However, strong grid sensitivity is reported near the maximum lift-state(𝐶𝐿max), with finer-grids showing larger errors and predicting erroneous flow topologies on the wing. Our RANS simulations show that several corrections for the Spalart-Allmaras (SA)turbulence model widely used in the community lead to more erroneous results compared to the baseline closure, without exception. Both scale-resolving methods (HRLES and WMLES)address these drawbacks and predict an outboard separation pattern on the main element that is in good agreement with the oil flow photographs taken from the QinetiQ wind tunnel experiments, when LES-appropriate grids and numerical discretizations are used. While RANS simulations with the baseline SA closure do not show any wing-root separation post𝐶𝐿max, both HRLES and WMLES show onset of corner flow separation with varying degrees of progression, along with a weak pitch break in the wing-contribution of the overall pitching moment. This post-𝐶𝐿max pitch break seen in the free-air simulations is weaker than the break observed in experiments, with a weaker break reported in WMLES for each iteration of grid-refinement. In-tunnel simulations using both SA-baseline RANS and WMLES show a much stronger post-𝐶𝐿max break with the WMLES predictions showing excellent agreement with the experiment in terms of both the flow-topology observed and the pressure-coefficients at various spanwise stations. Sensitivity to the tunnel wall boundary layer is characterized via comparisons between viscous and inviscid treatments for the tunnel walls. WMLES predictions show moderate sensitivity at the predicted inboard flow-state at 𝐶𝐿max along with the progression towards a post-𝐶𝐿max stall; however, this stalled state at 𝛼≈20◦(inside the tunnel) obtained with both tunnel wall treatments appears to be largely identical.

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Perspective for the High Lift Common Research Model Using the LAVA Framework

An in-depth assessment of the High Lift-Common Research Model (HL-CRM) aerodynamic performance is made using a Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methodology. Results presented here were produced in support of the 4th AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop(HLPW-4), with additional simulation results and analysis used to support findings from the workshop. Mesh resolution, RANS closure models, and tunnel effects were among the sources of simulation sensitivity addressed, all in the pursuit of evaluating best-practice simulation methods for complex high-lift configurations. In general, free-air simulations using RANS yield accurate predictions of integrated loads in the pre-stall regime for the HL-CRM, while strong sensitivity to simulation method is observed near CLmax. Additionally, a study assessing changes in aerodynamic performance due to flap deflection angle indicated strong sensitivity to turbulence model closure and mesh resolution, particularly at the highest deflection setting. Several available corrections for the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model were tested and generally introduced more error relative to the experiment in comparison to the baseline SA closure model. The Standard Menter Baseline Two-Equation (k-ωBSL) turbulence model was also explored, which arguably yielded results highly consistent with experiment, but at a substantially higher computational cost. Therefore, as a compromise between computational cost and accuracy, the baseline SA closure model was selected for additional HL-CRM studies that assess alternative solution methods. These strategies include “warm start” approaches, which initialize the simulation from a previously converged solution at a nearby angle of attack, unsteady calculations, and simulations that model the experimental wind tunnel. Results from these studies would reinforce the shortcomings of RANS in predicting aircraft performance at high-lift conditions, namely at high-αand highly loaded flap conditions, while also answering questions about appropriate modeling techniques to minimize the errors associated with RANS where possible

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of Actuator Disk, Actuator Line and Sliding Mesh Methods within the LAVA Solver

In this study the implementation of actuator-disk, actuator-line and sliding-mesh methodologies in the Launch Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) solver is described and validated against several test-cases. The different models are validated against available numerical as well as experimental data. Both steady and unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations using the Spallart Allmaras (SA) turbulence model are performed for several different configurations representative of aeroscience applications. The first part of the paper is focused on the verification and validation of the implemented propulsor models. The first validation case is a theoretical rotor in hover, compared with the 1D analytical solution derived from momentum theory. The second validation is the Rotor-Airframe Interaction Model of Georgia Institute of Technology (GIT), representing the application of actuator disks to top-mounted rotorcraft vehicles or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The third case is a representative configuration for tip-mounted rotor-craft vehicles such as NASA’s X57 airplane. The second part of the paper shows the implemented models applied to realistic engineering configurations such as NASA’s X57 airplane and the R4 Advanced Ducted Propellor (ADT). A modification to the actuator line method in order to represent the blade geometry more closely is proposed and comparisons with simulations modeling the blade utilizing a sliding-mesh approach are made.

ARMD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Computational Analysis of a Boundary-Layer Ingesting Tailcone Thruster Configuration Within the National Transonic Facility Using the LAVA Solver

Boundary-layer ingesting (BLI) propulsion systems are one of the many technologies currently under investigation within the aerospace community to meet NASA’s Advanced Air Transport Technology project goal of a sustainable future in aviation. To that end, an experimental campaign was conducted in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) to study the propulsion-airframe integration effects of the Boundary-Layer Ingesting Tailcone System installed in the aft portion of a 2.7% scale design of the NASA Common Research Model (CRM). This test was accompanied by a numerical simulation effort using the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) solver, to validate the applicability of current best-practice Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) models in accurately predicting the relevant flow-physics in free-air. A total of 205 steady RANS simulations were performed using LAVA, covering the range of conditions present in the NTF test matrix. Flow conditions ranged from 5- to 15-million Reynolds number, Mach numbers of 0.75, 0.80 and 0.85, and angles-of-attack between –3° and 4°. Four different mass-flow plugs were also tested to assess propulsor operating condition effects. Sensitivity to these flow conditions are analyzed in detail, especially in terms of the nacelle flow distortion which was the main subject of the study. Aerodynamic load coefficients, aftbody boundary-layer measurements and fuselage pressure tap results are also discussed, providing a wide range of validation results from this experimental campaign. This validation effort shows that current best-practices using RANS models within the LAVA solver flow solver are well suited for predicting the inlet flow distortion characteristics of novel aircraft configurations employing BLI at the aft end of the fuselage.

AATT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Computational Analysis of a Boundary Layer Ingesting Tailcone Thruster Configuration Using the LAVA Curvilinear Solver

Boundary layer ingesting (BLI) propulsion systems are one of the many technologies currently under investigation within the aerospace community to meet NASA's Advanced Air Transport Technology project goal of a sustainable future in aviation. To that end, an experimental campaign was conducted in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) wind tunnel to study the propulsion-airframe integration effects of the Boundary Layer Ingesting Tailcone System installed in the aft portion of a 2.7% scale design of the NASA Common Research Model (CRM). This test was accompanied by a numerical simulation effort using the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) curvilinear solver to validate the applicability of current best-practice Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models in accurately predicting the relevant flow physics in free-air. A total of 205 steady RANS simulations were performed using LAVA, covering the range of conditions present in the NTF test matrix. Flow conditions ranged from 5- to 15-million Reynolds number, Mach numbers of 0.75, 0.80 and 0.85, and angles of attack between -3 and 4 degrees. Four different mass-flow plugs were also tested to assess propulsor operating condition effects. Sensitivity to these flow conditions is analyzed in detail, especially in terms of the nacelle flow distortion which was the main subject of the study. Aerodynamic load coefficients, aft body boundary layer measurements and fuselage pressure tap results are also discussed, providing a wide range of validation results from this experimental campaign. This validation effort shows that current best-practices using RANS models within the LAVA curvilinear solver flow solver are well suited for predicting the inlet flow distortion characteristics of novel aircraft configurations employing BLI at the aft end of the fuselage. This talk will cover the combined experimental and numerical efforts that resulted from this BLI-focused investigation.

ARMD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of Shared Mounting Structure for SUSAN Aircraft Tail and Aft Engine

This paper introduces an overview of the design and development of the Subsonic Single Aft eNgine (SUSAN) aircraft aft tail and engine shared mounting structure. Unique design considerations were made here to take advantage of aerodynamic effects such as boundary layer ingestion of the aft mounted engine. Challenges that arose from sharing the same mounting structure with the T-tail and aft engine were addressed. The structural development process will be discussed for both the initial design concept for the full-scale SUSAN aircraft concept, as well as the higher fidelity development of the 25% scale research vehicle. Numerical simulations for the aerodynamic loads are detailed and were fed into the 25% scale structural analysis effort. Additionally, mockup component fabrications of the shared aft engine and tail mounting structure are also shown to demonstrate design feasibility.

Lilia R Glaser↗