Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Lusheng Liang

Publications and source records attributed to Lusheng Liang.

12 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2020

Radiative Transfer Models for Deriving Geostationary Broadband Shortwave Radiances Directly from Visible Channels for the Ceres SYN1DEG Product

The Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System(CERES)project was designed to observe the Earth’s radiation budget at the 1° regional and global scale. The CERES instruments on the Terra (10:30 AM local equator crossing time) and Aqua (1:30 PM) satellite may not accurately capture the 24-hour mean flux over regions with systematic diurnal cycles. The Terra-only and Aqua-only derived regional monthly mean SW flux can differ by 25 Wm-2 over maritime stratus and land afternoon convective regions. The CERES project utilizes hourly Geostationary imager (GEO) derived broadband fluxes to more accurately estimate the regional diurnal flux in between CERES measurements. We propose an approach that converts the GEO visible radiance to broadband radiance using RTM radiances that are specific to the individual GEO visible channel spectral response functions. The RTM is first validated using the very spectrally narrow MODIS visible channel and CERES broadband radiances.

geostationary derived broadband radiances↗
NASA NTRS2020

Uncertainties in CERES Top-of-Atmosphere Fluxes Caused by Changes in Accompanying Imager

The Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) project provides observations of Earth’s radiation budget using measurements from CERES instruments on board the Terra, Aqua, Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (S-NPP), and NOAA-20 satellites. The CERES top-of-atmosphere (TOA) fluxes are produced by converting radiance measurements using empirical angular distribution models, which are functions of cloud properties that are retrieved from imagers flying with the CERES instruments. As the objective is to create a long-term climate data record, not only calibration consistency of the six CERES instruments needs to be maintained for the entire time period, it is also important to maintain the consistency of other input data sets used to produce this climate data record. In this paper, we address aspects that could potentially affect the CERES TOA flux data quality. Discontinuities in imager calibration can affect cloud retrieval which can lead to erroneous flux trends. When imposing an artificial 0.6 per decade decreasing trend to cloud optical depth, which is similar to the trend difference between CERES Edition 2 and Edition 4 cloud retrievals, the decadal SW flux trend changed from −0.3 5 ± 0.18 Wm −2 to 0.61 ± 0.18 Wm −2 . This indicates that a 13% change in cloud optical depth results in about 1% change in the SW flux. Furthermore, different CERES instruments provide valid fluxes at different viewing zenith angle ranges, and including fluxes derived at the most oblique angels unique to S-NPP (>66 ∘ ) can lead to differences of 0.8 Wm −2 and 0.3 Wm −2 in global monthly mean instantaneous SW flux and LW flux. To ensure continuity, the viewing zenith angle ranges common to all CERES instruments (<66 ∘ ) are used to produce the long-term Earth’s radiation budget climate data record. The consistency of cloud properties retrieved from different imagers also needs to be maintained to ensure the TOA flux consistency.

Wenying Su↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Evaluating Retrieval Algorithm Climate Stability: Estimating 3D Optical Thickness Bias Distributions by Cloud Type

Detecting climate trends on large spatiotemporal scales requires accurate, stable measurements and stable retrieval algorithms. We strive to estimate how time-variant retrieval algorithm biases may impact trend detection. Here we focus on the 3D cloud optical thickness (τc) bias, which is among the largest in passive cloud retrieval algorithms. If this bias is time dependent, a possibility with potential decadal changes in cloud morphology, it may obscure genuine trends in τc. Although previous studies have evaluated the cloud- and sun-view geometry-dependent 3D τc bias on small spatial scales, before our current study none have evaluated the stability of this well-known bias on climate-relevant large spatiotemporal scales. These studies must estimate large scale distributions of the 3D τc bias by cloud type and estimate how cloud type amount may change between two climate states. We employ a novel approach to estimate large scale distributions of 3D τc using a proxy of the bias that quantifies the departure of clouds from satisfying the 1D radiative transfer assumption used in passive τc retrievals. This existing globally-distributed proxy is an angular consistency metric that was developed using fused Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Multi-angle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) measurements. Calculating the 3D τc bias and the proxy, for known cloud fields enables us to establish statistical relationships between these two quantities, which can be used to calculate large-scale distributions of the 3D τc bias. This approach limits the number of 3D radiative transfer simulations required to only those needed to estimate a statistical relationship between the 3D τc bias for known cloud fields and a proxy of the bias. It is likely that future studies will be needed to evaluate retrieval algorithm bias stability for other geophysical variables as the community develops climate data records from satellite observations and their retrievals. This must be done in addition to monitoring and correcting measurement errors and uncertainties and understanding their impact on retrieved essential climate variables.

Yolanda Shea↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Understanding The Top-Of-Atmosphere Fluxes Difference Between Aerocom Phase III Models And The CERES Product: Clear-Sky Perspective

The Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) project produces a long-term global climate data record (CDR) that can be used to detect decadal changes in the Earth’s radiation budget (ERB) from the surface to the top-of-atmosphere (TOA). The CERES Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) product includes monthly mean shortwave (SW), longwave (LW), and net TOA all-sky and clear-sky radiative fluxes over 1-degree latitude by 1-degree longitude regions. The EBAF SW and LW fluxes are adjusted within their uncertainties to be consistent with the heat storage in the Earth-atmosphere system (Johnson et al. 2016). EBAF also provides a gap-free monthly mean clear-sky flux map by inferring clear-sky fluxes from both CERES and MODIS measurements (Loeb et al. 2018). In this study, we compare the TOA clear-sky fluxes from Aerocom phase III output with those from the CERES EBAF products. Flux differences over the ocean are generally smaller than over the land, and the magnitude of the differences shows seasonal and regional dependency. To understand the flux differences, aerosol optical depths (AOD) from the Aerocom models are compared with the satellite retrievals from MODIS and MISR. Over the ocean, the AOD differences and the flux differences show consistent regional features, indicating that the differences between models and observations are robust as the CERES EBAF clear-sky SW fluxes and MODIS/MISR AODs are determined independently. However, very little resemblance is found between the AOD and flux differences over the land. To further understand the cause of the flux differences over the land, we compare the land surface albedo from MODIS with the albedo from the models and find consistency in regional albedo differences and flux differences. Monthly regional radiative kernels of AOD and surface albedo derived using the MERRA-2 reanalysis data (Thorsen et al. 2020) are applied to AOD and surface albedo differences between models and observations. For most of the models, the AOD and surface albedo differences can explain most of the flux differences between models and CERES EBAF. The EOS era satellites have provided 20 years of carefully calibrated and validated observations that are suitable for trend analysis. Both the MODIS AOD and CERES EBAF clear-sky SW flux show decreasing trends over the coastal regions of eastern China and the eastern United States due to the emission control policies enforced in both countries, and an increasing trend off the coast of India. The AOD and clear-sky SW flux trends are less consistent over land, as the surface albedo changes complicate the clear-sky SW flux trend. The AOD and clear-sky SW flux trends from the Oslo model HIST run are also examined. However, none of the aforementioned regional trends are found in the model results.

Wenying Su↗