Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

M. G. Jones

Publications and source records attributed to M. G. Jones.

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Improved Impedance Eduction Process for the NASA Langley GFIT

The Grazing Flow Impedance Tube (GFIT) is regularly employed to characterize the frequency response of acoustic liners through the eduction of their specific acoustic impedance. Acoustic pressures acquired in the facility are processed with various eduction methods to arrive at these impedance values. Recent implementation of the Swept-Sine Method provides much greater frequency resolution when characterizing the acoustic properties of a liner. The attendant increase in data that must be processed from this method has highlighted a need for greater efficiency in educing acoustic impedance. The current work details efforts to improve the eduction process through use of a hybrid approach that combines a Prony-based method with the Convected Helmholtz-based calculation generally used for this type of data. Comparisons of efficiency and accuracy are shown for this new hybrid approach versus earlier methods for three acoustic liners tested under various conditions in the GFIT with stepped-sine and recently implemented swept-sine sources.

Eduction↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Benchmark Data for Evaluation of NASA Impedance Eduction Methods

Results achieved with three acoustic liner configurations are used to evaluate the effects of recent modifications to the NASA Normal Incidence Tube and Grazing Flow Impedance Tube. These include a calibration liner, a wire mesh liner, and a perforate liner. The effects of source type, source level, and mean flow Mach number on the impedances educed with these liners are explored. Existing models are used to predict the impedance for each test condition, and are compared with educed impedance spectra to determine their validity. The results suggest that educed impedances are similar for either a stepped sine or swept sine source. The predicted models are acceptable for the perforate liner, and are quite good for the calibration and wire mesh liners.

acoustic↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparisons of Impedance Prediction Models for Perforate-over-Honeycomb Liners

A large dataset is used to evaluate the efficacy of multiple impedance prediction models for perforate-over-honeycomb liners. Two-factorial analysis is used to explore the relative importance of the key parameters used in these models. Tests are conducted in the NASALangley Normal Incidence Tube and Grazing Flow Impedance Tube with over eighty perforate facesheets at multiple source sound pressure levels, Mach numbers and frequencies. Each prediction model is then compared with this dataset to determine how well each method predicts the measured data. Finally, an optimizer is used to further improve the ability of one of these models to reproduce the measured results.

acoustic↗