Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Mace, Erich

Publications and source records attributed to Mace, Erich.

Making Coal Relevant for Small Scale Applications: Modular Gasification for Syngas/Engine CHP Applications in Challenging Environments

This Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) study is funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE), and managed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) through a Cooperative Agreement awarded to the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) to perform a technical and cost study for the design and installation of a Hamilton-Maurer International (HMI) gasifier for generating a clean syngas for firing in reciprocating engines. An existing diesel engine generator (DEG) and a commercially available spark ignition engine are used to generate electricity with the low-Btu syngas. Other than the HMI gasifier, only commercially available technologies were assumed for this study. An important objective of this design study was to estimate capital and operating costs of small modular coal and coal/biomass fired generating units to provide wind regulation services. Although this study is based on retrofitting an existing coal fired power plant with the HMI gasifier, sufficient data was developed to characterize greenfield units. The original concept was to provide clean syngas and tars/oils from the gasification process to the existing Colt-Pielstick PC2.6B diesel engine generator (9.6 MWe) installed at the UAF Atkinson Power Plant. The intent was to convert the diesel engine to operate in a dual fuel mode, firing both syngas and tars/oils. As the project progressed, Fairbanks Morse Engine (FME), current licensee for the Colt-Pielstick engine line, was not able to develop a modification package for the engine to allow for syngas firing. Although this type of modification is available for firing natural gas, the capability does not extend to syngas. Western Energy Systems, distributor for Innio Jenbacher, was able to offer the Jenbacher Model JMS620 engine. After review of available options, the project team selected a design configuration using two Jenbacher engines rated at 1965 kWe each to fire the syngas, with the oils/tars directed to the Colt Pielstick diesel to be blended with ultra-low sulfur diesel oil (ULSD). The Jenbacher engines are expected to operate at continuous base load, with some load-following ability, while the existing diesel engine will operate in grid support service, with loads varying from a nominal 25% to 100%. An annual capacity factor for the diesel engine is projected to be between 50% and 60%. The overall gasifier and gas clean-up system is sized to produce enough syngas to adequately fuel three Jenbacher Engines for a nominal power output of 5.9 MWe, but this study assumes that only two Jenbacher engines will be installed due to space constraints in the Atkinson Power Plant, and because of expected air emission permit limitations. There is still potential that the excess syngas capacity equivalent to about 2 MWe could be used as supplemental fuel for the DEG. The exhaust from the Jenbacher engines is passed through heat recovery units to generate low pressure steam, thereby providing a significant portion of the steam required for operating the gasifier. The overall performance of the HMI gasifier/engine configuration is summarized as follows: 1) Overall electric efficiency, Jenbacher and diesel engines, based on gasifier fuel production (syngas and pyrolysis liquids) is 35.2% LHV, 2) Overall cogenerating efficiency (electricity plus steam), based on gasifier fuel production (syngas and pyrolysis liquids) is 54.8% LHV, 3) Overall electric efficiency, Jenbacher and diesel engines, based on coal input, is 29.6% LHV, and 4) Overall cogenerating efficiency, electricity plus steam, based on coal input is 46.0%. This project is estimated to have a Bare Erected Cost (BEC) of $\$$ 33.4 million and a Total Plant Cost (TPC) of $\$$ 45.7 million. Based on the original scope, sending both the clean syngas and the oils and tars to the existing diesel engine, the BEC and TPC values would have been $\$$ 23.3 million and $\$$ 32.1 million, respectively. A variable Cost of Electricity (COE) is calculated to reflect only those costs that will be incurred by incremental operation of the system for the HMI gasifier/Jenbacher engine combination. Operation of the diesel engine is determined separately. The variable COE values are: Case 1: 100% Usibelli Coal: (a) HMI gasifier/Jenbacher Engines -- 8.3 cents/kWh; (b) Diesel Engine -- 20.2 cents/kWh, and Case 2: 80% Usibelli Coal + 20% wood chips (proportion based on Btu input, LHV basis): (a) HMI Gasifier/Jenbacher -- 13.7 cents/kWh; (b) Diesel Engine -- 20.2 cents/kWh. The incremental cost of operating the gasifier/Jenbacher system increases with co-firing of wood chips due to the high cost of this material, over five times as costly as Usibelli coal delivered to the Atkinson Power building. The diesel cost is constant as the oils and tars are priced at the same value as the ULSD for the purposes of fueling the diesel engine. Section 8 of this report provides details of the O&M costs. The overall power system is configured to be modular and scalable to provide a wide range of generating capacity using the same components. This allows for reduction in cost, risk, schedule time to engineer and construct, and provides some degree of repeatability for air permitting.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Chemical Looping Coal Gasification Sub-Pilot Unit Demonstration and Economic Assessment for IGCC applications (Final Report)

The Ohio State University (OSU) coal to syngas (CTS) technology is an advanced air separation process that can be applied for electricity production via an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC). The objective of the proposed project is to enable the OSU CLG technology for a commercially relevant demonstration by 2020. In order to accomplish this objective, small pilot scale demonstration of the CLG reactor system was performed. The small pilot test unit incorporates commercially scalable non-mechanical gas sealing and solids flow control components for extended operations of the integrated reactor system. A cumulative demonstration of greater than 100 hours was performed to confirm the reliability of the reactors (reducer and oxidizer) and non-mechanical devices in maintaining controlled solid circulation, gas sealing, and coal distribution in the reactor (reducer) as well as to confirm sustained syngas product performance. A comprehensive techno-economic analysis (TEA) of the OSU CLG process for IGCC application was conducted with the support of WorleyParsons, Ltd. (WP) and compared to the Department of Energy (DOE) baseline IGCC report. Using the data gained from the small pilot demonstration, a complete comprehensive techno-economic analysis (TEA) of the CLG process was conducted. The evaluation was used as basis to attract utilities and coal industries in Ohio. The project duration lasts 30 months (6 months of no cost extension). Ohio coal was used in the integrated CLG small pilot unit to convert to high hydrogen syngas. A demonstration of the integrated chemical looping reactor system at the 15 kW th scale accelerates technology commercialization in the near term. The 15 kWth demonstration addressed several major technology gaps, such as coal injection and distribution in the reducer, controllable solids circulation with the desired fuel to solids ratio, system pressure distribution for proper gas sealing, effects of contaminants and fuel/oxygen carrier residence time requirements. The fates of impurities, such as SO x and NO x was also investigated in unit demonstrations. WP conducted a comprehensive system TEA to optimize the OSU CLG process design for efficient electricity generation with greater than 90% CO 2 capture in IGCC applications. The conclusion of this project supports the further scale-up of the technology to a commercially applicable large pilot scale test unit for operation by 2020. More importantly, it benefits Ohio as it provides an economically competitive mean for power generation with carbon capture. Given the rise of natural gas usage and strict environmental regulations, the use of Ohio coal is expected to decrease and thus impact the coal economy in Ohio. The conclusion of this project provided way for Ohio coal to compete in the future and secure jobs in the energy sector.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗