Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Magana-Zook, S. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Magana-Zook, S. A..

Dynamic Networks Experiment FY18 - Quality Control Focus Area Efforts

The availability of data whose quality is fittingly labeled is of tantamount importance to signal detection and all other downstream signal processing operations. Without identification, the goals of low yield nuclear monitoring cannot reach their full potential. A fundamental question that remains is the knowledge of the capability gaps that prevent us from using open network data. With these new channels, we will need better understanding of the frequency, type, severity, and impact of artifacts when compared to conventional networks. Moreover, beyond a simple quality label, thresholds for acceptable use of the data will need to be established, likely on a use case by use case basis. Finally, orders of magnitude more data with an at-best static analyst pool size means that quality artifacts must be identified with as little human interaction as possible. Automated methodologies must be developed to account for the scale of the problem when ad hoc networks are candidates for processing. At the same time that “data wealth” provides more opportunity for signal exploitation, the introduction of ad hoc networks introduces an increased risk quality issues in both sensor value and metadata issues. The artifacts shown below are examples of some sensor-based quality issues that impair downstream processing. The machine learning model used in this project was able to identify the artifacts that produce these spurious correlations, significantly improving analyst productivity.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Scalable Metadata Management for a Large Multi-Source Seismic Data Repository

In this work, we implemented the key metadata management components of a scalable seismic data ingestion framework to address limitations in our existing system, and to position it for anticipated growth in volume and complexity. We began the effort with an assessment of open source data flow tools from the Hadoop ecosystem. We then began the construction of a layered architecture that is specifically designed to address many of the scalability and data quality issues we experience with our current pipeline. This included implementing basic functionality in each of the layers, such as establishing a data lake, designing a unified metadata schema, tracking provenance, and calculating data quality metrics. Our original intent was to test and validate the new ingestion framework with data from a large-scale field deployment in a temporary network. This delivered somewhat unsatisfying results, since the new system immediately identified fatal flaws in the data relatively early in the pipeline. Although this is a correct result it did not allow us to sufficiently exercise the whole framework. We then widened our scope to process all available metadata from over a dozen online seismic data sources to further test the implementation and validate the design. This experiment also uncovered a higher than expected frequency of certain types of metadata issues that challenged us to further tune our data management strategy to handle them. Our result from this project is a greatly improved understanding of real world data issues, a validated design, and prototype implementations of major components of an eventual production framework. This successfully forms the basis of future development for the Geophysical Monitoring Program data pipeline, which is a critical asset supporting multiple programs. It also positions us very well to deliver valuable metadata management expertise to our sponsors, and has already resulted in an NNSA Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation commitment to a multi-year project for follow-on work.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

Data Intensive Computing on Amazon Web Services

The Geophysical Monitoring Program (GMP) has spent the past few years building up the capability to perform data intensive computing using what have been referred to as “big data” tools. These big data tools would be used against massive archives of seismic signals (>300 TB) to conduct research not previously possible. Examples of such tools include Hadoop (HDFS, MapReduce), HBase, Hive, Storm, Spark, Solr, and many more by the day. These tools are useful for performing data analytics on datasets that exceed the resources of traditional analytic approaches. To this end, a research big data cluster (“Cluster A”) was set up as a collaboration between GMP and Livermore Computing (LC).

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗