Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Malcolm, G. N.

Publications and source records attributed to Malcolm, G. N..

29 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1976

Asymmetric aerodynamic forces on aircraft at high angles of attack - some design guides

Aerodynamic side forces on forebodies are considered that are produced by two types of flow: asymmetric vortices on bodies of revolution and nonuniform flow separation on square bodies with rounded corners under spinning conditions. Steady side forces that can be as large as the normal force are produced by asymmetric vortices on pointed forebodies. This side force has a large variation with Reynolds number, decreases rapidly with Mach number, and can be nearly eliminated with small nose bluntness or strakes. The angle of attack where the side force first occurs depends primarily on body geometry. The theoretical techniques to predict these side forces are necessarily semi-empirical because the basic phenomenon is not well understood. The side forces produced by nonuniform flow separation under spinning conditions depend extensively on spin rate, angle of attack, and Reynolds number. The application of simple crossflow theory to predict this side force is inadequate much below angles of attack of 90 deg.

Chapman, G. T.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Wind-tunnel testing with a rotary-balance apparatus to simulate aircraft spin motions

Experiments have been conducted in the Ames 12-Foot Pressure Wind Tunnel on a simple airplane-like model using a rotary-balance apparatus to simulate a steady spin motion at high angles of attack. Tests were run at Mach numbers of 0.1 and 0.25 over a wide Reynolds number range with the angle of attack varying from 45 to 90 deg. During previous tests of the same research model, some difficulties were experienced with measurement accuracy in the low-to-medium range of Reynolds number because of limitations in the sensitivity of selected force balances. For the present tests, special balances were built to provide accurate measurements of the nose and tail contributions to spin motions and improvements were made to the overall test apparatus. The results of this test, including some interesting hysteresis effects with spin rate, are described. Some of the problems associated with rotary-balance tests at high Reynolds numbers are discussed. A new large-scale rotary apparatus now nearing completion for use in the Ames 12-Foot and 11- by 11-Foot Wind Tunnels is described briefly.

Malcolm, G. N.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Experimental determination of post-stall rotary derivatives for airplane-like configurations at several Reynolds numbers

Military and civilian airplane losses due to out-of-control spin motions are significant. Knowledge of rotary coefficients is necessary to understand the cause of spin entry and to devise proper recovery techniques. An exploratory wind-tunnel investigation has been conducted on simple airplane-like configurations on a rotary sting apparatus at rotation rates up to 10 rps. Rotary coefficients have been measured at unit Reynolds numbers from 2,000,000 to 24,600,000 per m and at angles of attack from 45 to 90 deg. Results show that the aerodynamic characteristics at steady spin rates are highly dependent on both spin rate and Reynolds number.

Clarkson, M. H.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Ballistic range investigation of sonic-boom overpressures in water.

An investigation of sonic-boom overpressures in water has been conducted by gun-launching small cone-cylinder models over water. Flights were conducted at Mach numbers of 2.7 and 5.7, in air, corresponding to Mach numbers of 0.6 and 1.3, respectively, in water. Shadowgraph pictures and underwater pressure measurements indicate that for horizontal flights at Mach numbers below Mach 4.4 in air (i.e., subsonic relative to the speed of sound in water) the resulting underwater disturbance is an acoustic wave whose peak pressure attenuates rapidly with water depth. In contrast, at supersonic Mach numbers, relative to water, the incident shock wave at the surface is transmitted into the water as a propagating shock wave and the peak pressure associated with it does not attenuate with water depth.

Malcolm, G. N.↗