Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Malhotra, Dhairya (ORCID:0000000195671322)

Publications and source records attributed to Malhotra, Dhairya (ORCID:0000000195671322).

The magnetic gradient scale length explains why certain plasmas require close external magnetic coils

Abstract The separation between the last closed flux surface of a plasma and the external coils that magnetically confine it is a limiting factor in the construction of fusion-capable plasma devices. This plasma-coil separation must be large enough so that components such as a breeding blanket and neutron shielding can fit between the plasma and the coils. Plasma-coil separation affects reactor size, engineering complexity, and particle loss due to field ripple. For some plasmas it can be difficult to produce the desired flux surface shaping with distant coils, and for other plasmas it is infeasible altogether. Here, we seek to understand the underlying physics that limits plasma-coil separation and explain why some configurations require close external coils. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that the limiting plasma-coil separation is set by the shortest scale length of the magnetic field as expressed by the ∇ B tensor. We tested this hypothesis on a database of > 40 stellarator and tokamak configurations. Within this database, the coil-to-plasma distance compared to the minor radius varies by over an order of magnitude. The magnetic scale length is well correlated to the coil-to-plasma distance of actual coil designs generated using the REGCOIL method (Landreman 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 046003). Additionally, this correlation reveals a general trend that larger plasma-coil separation is possible with a small number of field periods.

Physics↗

Comment on “Stepped pressure profile equilibria in cylindrical plasmas via partial Taylor relaxation” [J. Plasma Physics (2006), vol. 72, part 6, pp. 1167–1171]

In an early study of the properties and capabilities of the multiregion, relaxed magnetohydrodynamic model, Hole, Hudson & Dewar claim that they are able to construct a multiregion stepped pressure cylindrical equilibrium which does not require the existence of surface currents. We present a brief argument showing that this claim is incorrect, and clarify the meaning of their statement. Furthermore, even with the statement clarified, we demonstrate that it is not possible to find solutions to reproduce the equilibrium corresponding to the parameters given in the article. We invite the authors to provide a corrigendum with the correct values of the equilibrium they constructed.

Physics↗