Search NASASearch

Engineering topics

Manard, Benjamin T.

Publications and source records attributed to Manard, Benjamin T..

Batch Extraction Studies to Evaluate Trace Element Behavior in PUREX Conditions

The multilab Intentional Forensics Venture is working to identify which stable elements (i.e., taggants) at trace concentrations relative to U would persist throughout the nuclear fuel cycle in a voluntary fuel tagging scheme. A taggant would provide the nuclear forensics community with a “barcode” to help identify nuclear materials found outside of regulatory control. A portion of this project was focused on reprocessing effects and determining which, if any, elements would coextract with U(VI) in standard Pu–U reduction extraction (PUREX) conditions. Elements with a propensity to coextract could, in theory, be used as taggants from a PUREX perspective. Although retention is not a performance requirement, the taggant signature would need to partition predictably from the U stream after the PUREX process to maintain forensic utility. This report documents results from several batch extraction studies with numerous trace elements from HNO 3 (1.5–5 M), with and without U(VI), into 30% tri-n-butyl phosphate (TBP) in kerosene. Extraction and back-extraction tests were used to evaluate nearly 60 elements in surrogate conditions for PUREX, and distribution coefficients (i.e., D-values) for most species were <0.1, indicating few species are likely to co-extract with U through PUREX. Additional studies are needed to optimize sample volumes and dilutions to dial in these low D-values. The D-values (D) were determined for several of the more promising elements, including Re and Se. Ultimately, we conclude that only a limited number of the ~ 60 elements investigated are extractable in the U stream of PUREX, based on measured D values, meaning most candidate elemental taggants would likely be lost at this stage of the nuclear fuel cycle, even when considering a range of acid concentrations.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA

Complete resolution across the neodymium/samarium isotopic envelope with a liquid sampling‐atmospheric pressure glow discharge — Orbitrap mass spectrometer

Rationale Nd and Sm isotope ratios play an important role in geological dating and as nuclear forensic signatures; however, the overlap of the respective 144, 148, 150 Nd/Sm isobars requires prior separations to be performed before analysis on typical MS platforms. The work presented here overcomes these isobaric interferences using ultrahigh‐mass resolution to alleviate interference without prior chemical separations. Methods A liquid sampling‐atmospheric pressure glow discharge ion source was coupled to a standard, QExactive Focus Orbitrap mass spectrometer, providing a mass resolution of ~80 k. A Spectroswiss FTMS booster X2 data acquisition package was used to collect extended transients, providing much higher mass resolution; ~230 k and ~600 k are employed here for Nd and Sm isotopes. Results While the standard Orbitrap resolution is far greater than typical “atomic” MS platforms, it was insufficient to alleviate all isobars. The use of a resolution of ~230 k resulted in baseline separation across the entire isotopic envelope for both Nd and Sm. Isotope ratios obtained from Nd:Sm mixtures using high‐resolution were equivalent to those found for individual‐element solutions, while isotope ratios obtained at a resolution of ~80 k (standard for the OEM data system) showed large deviations. Conclusions Use of ultrahigh‐resolution is an attractive alternative to extensive chemical separations to alleviate severe isobaric interferences. Sufficient mass resolution greatly reduces/eliminates the need for sample manipulations (separations) before analysis while reducing costs and total analysis times.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH

A preliminary investigation into the feasibility of laser ablation U–Pb isotope ratio measurement via all‐faraday cup detection with 10 11 ‐ and 10 13 ‐Ω amplifiers on the Neoma multicollector‐inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometer

Rationale Signal detection for uranium–lead (U–Pb) dating of zircon is typically performed via ion counters. Here, we develop a preliminary understanding of the strengths and limitations of faraday‐cup‐based detection. Methods A suite of zircon reference materials and the NIST‐610 glass were sampled using laser ablation followed by U–Pb isotope ratio measurement on a Neoma multicollector‐inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometer. Results We were able to produce geologically accurate 207 Pb/ 206 Pb, 206 Pb/ 238 U, and 207 Pb/ 235 U ratios for the NIST‐610 glass and the zircon standards, with ages ranging from ~2.5 Ga to ~337 Ma (TanBrown A, Oracle, 91550, Mud Tank, Temora, and Plešovice). Two of the younger zircon standards examined (94‐35, ~55.6 Ma, and Fish Canyon, 28.6 Ma) yielded accurate 206 Pb/ 238 U but not 207 Pb/ 235 U or 207 Pb/ 206 Pb ratios, whereas the youngest zircon standard (Penglai, ~4.4 Ma) failed for all three ratios of interest. The accuracy and precision of the all‐faraday method are directly tied to signal intensity, with reliable data capable of being produced even when both isotopes in a ratio have signals below ~0.001 V (equivalent to ~62 500 cps on an ion counter). Conclusion The all‐faraday cup multicollection method provides sufficient sensitivity to obtain geologically meaningful U–Pb data, with possible advantages being that laser pit depth‐dependent changes in the observed interelemental fractionation behavior may be easier to correct using a static collector configuration compared to when the ion beam is swept across a single detector while also removing the need for an interdetector‐type calibration. Further work is needed to refine the all‐faraday cup method (e.g., application of background subtraction and common Pb corrections, outlier removal, and interelement as well as down‐hole fractionation corrections), but our initial results demonstrate that the faraday detector method has sufficient sensitivity to warrant further study.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND