Engineering topics
Manning, Rob
Publications and source records attributed to Manning, Rob.
The Hidden Dimensions of Architecture and Engineering Design
The art of going from a notional vision of a system to a fully realizable design is called “architecting.” For an architecture to be realizable over its lifetime, it has to conform to many demands. Not only does it need to conform to the vision and its ultimate purpose, it needs to adhere to a world of requirements: affordability, reliability, legality, operability, simplicity, analyzability, testability, understandability, accessibility, manufacturability, and repairability, among many others. Ultimately, the architectures that “hang together” in many or all of these dimensions evoke a sense of elegance and beauty. Please join us as Frank Gehry and JPLers Rob Manning and Raul Polit-Casillas discuss examples of design and architecture, and the importance of a well-thought-out design.
Summary of the First High-Altitude, Supersonic Flight Dynamics Test for the Low-Density Supersonic Decelerator Project
NASA's Low-Density Supersonic Decelerator Project is developing and testing the next generation of supersonic aerodynamic decelerators for planetary entry. A key element of that development is the testing of full-scale articles in conditions relevant to their intended use, primarily the tenuous Mars atmosphere. To achieve this testing, the LDSD project developed a test architecture similar to that used by the Viking Project in the early 1970's for the qualification of their supersonic parachute. A large, helium filled scientific balloon is used to hoist a 4.7 m blunt body test vehicle to an altitude of approximately 32 kilometers. The test vehicle is released from the balloon, spun up for gyroscopic stability, and accelerated to over four times the speed of sound and an altitude of 50 kilometers using a large solid rocket motor. Once at those conditions, the vehicle is despun and the test period begins. The first flight of this architecture occurred on June 28th of 2014. Though primarily a shake out flight of the new test system, the flight was also able to achieve an early test of two of the LDSD technologies, a large 6 m diameter Supersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (SIAD) and a large, 30.5 m nominal diameter supersonic parachute. This paper summarizes this first flight.
Challenges of MSL Entry, Descent, and Landing Validation: Or, "7 Years of Terror"
No abstract available
Systems engineering the Mars Exploration Rovers
This paper will overview the project highlighting some of the systems engineering approaches used throughout the project lifecycle to address the challenges as well as lessons learned.
7.3 Communications and Navigation
This presentation gives an overview of the networks NASA currently uses to support space communications and navigation, and the requirements for supporting future deep space missions, including manned lunar and Mars missions. The presentation addresses the Space Network, Deep Space Network, and Ground Network, why new support systems are needed, and the potential for catastrophic failure of aging antennas. Space communications and navigation are considered during Aerocapture, Entry, Descent and Landing (AEDL) only in order to precisely position, track and interact with the spacecraft at its destination (moon, Mars and Earth return) arrival. The presentation recommends a combined optical/radio frequency strategy for deep space communications.
Human Planetary Landing System (HPLS) Capability Roadmap: Wrap Up
When and how does the full scale system and subsystems need to be qualified & Human-rated for flight? Answer: No later than 29. Full scale AEDL Flight Tests can and should be done at Earth (need to get fast turn around between multiple tests). Do we need a Full Scale Validation Flight Test at Mars? Answer: Not, specifically, but the AEDL community is very uncomfortable with the notion of the very first full scale AEDL being piloted. The full scale unpiloted AEDL advance cargo mission that immediately precedes the human landing could do the trick. What kind of precursor AEDL Flight Tests are needed at Mars? Answer: We need to validate our performance & aerodynamic models by flying a scaled (1/10th?) version of the Full Scale Mission by 22. When and how do we decide on the AEDL system to fly? Answer: No later than 2015 (earlier is harder). We need to do multi-path full scale flight simulations and subscale / component development testing starting ASAP. If we find an AEDL for a landing mass of 40 MT, will this same architecture and technology paradigm extend to landing 80 MT? 120 MT? Is there another break point? Answer: We do not know yet.
A-Prior Observations
Contents include the following: Capability Description, Benefits, Current State-of-the-Art. Capability Requirements and Assumptions. Maturity Level - Capabilities. Maturity Level - Technologies. Metrics. Roadmap for Capability.
Human Planetary Landing System (HPLS) Capability Roadmap NRC Progress Review
Capability Roadmap Team. Capability Description, Scope and Capability Breakdown Structure. Benefits of the HPLS. Roadmap Process and Approach. Current State-of-the-Art, Assumptions and Key Requirements. Top Level HPLS Roadmap. Capability Presentations by Leads. Mission Drivers Requirements. "AEDL" System Engineering. Communication & Navigation Systems. Hypersonic Systems. Super to Subsonic Decelerator Systems. Terminal Descent and Landing Systems. A Priori In-Situ Mars Observations. AEDL Analysis, Test and Validation Infrastructure. Capability Technical Challenges. Capability Connection Points to other Roadmaps/Crosswalks. Summary of Top Level Capability. Forward Work.
Genesis failure investigation report : JPL Failure Review Board, Avionics Sub-Team
On January 7, 2001, the Genesis spacecraft lifted off from Cape Canaveral. Its mission was to collect solar wind samples and return those samples to Earth for detailed analysis by scientists. The mission proceeded successfully for three-and-a-half years. On September 8, 2004, the spacecraft approached Earth, pointed the Sample Return Capsule (SRC) at its entry target, and then fired pyros that jettisoned the SRC. The SRC carried the valuable samples collected over the prior 29 months. The SRC also contained the requisite hardware (mechanisms, parachutes, and electronics) to manage the process of entry, descent, and landing (EDL). After entering Earthas atmosphere, the SRC was expected to open a drogue parachute. This should have been followed by a pyro event to release the drogue chute, and then by a pyro event to deploy the main parachute at an approximate elevation of 6.7 kilometers. As the SRC descended to the Utah landing site, helicopters were in position to capture the SRC before the capsule touched down. On September 8, 2004, observers of the SRCas triumphant return became concerned as the NASA announcer fell silent, and then became even more alarmed as they watched the spacecraft tumble as it streaked across the sky. Long-distance cameras clearly showed that the drogue parachute had not deployed properly. On September 9, 2004, General Eugene Tattini, Deputy Director of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory formed a Failure Review Board (FRB). This board was charged with investigating the cause of the Genesis mishap in close concert with the NASA Mishap Investigation Board (MIB). The JPL-FRB was populated with experts from within and external to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The JPL-FRB participated with the NASA-MIB through all phases of the investigation, working jointly and concurrently as one team to discover the facts of the mishap.