Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Marc R. Schultz

Publications and source records attributed to Marc R. Schultz.

8 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2022

Buckling Test and Analysis of the 8-Foot-Diameter Sandwich Composite Cylinder Test Article CTA8.2 as Part of the Shell Buckling Knockdown Factor Project: Test Dates 5-7 December 2017

It is well known that the buckling response of thin shell structures can be sensitive to small imperfections in the geometry and loading. The NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) Shell Buckling Knockdown Factor Project (SBKF) has the goal of developing buckling design recommendations for select classes of metallic and composite shells. Part of completed SBKF work is described in this report. In particular, the test and analysis results from the second SBKF composite test article, CTA8.2, are described. This test was the second in a series of tests on sandwich composite cylinders that can be used to experimentally validate analysis methods, which in turn can be used to develop analysis-based shell buckling design guidelines for sandwich composite launch-vehicle cylindrical structures. CTA8.2 was an 8-foot diameter honeycomb-core sandwich cylinder that was fabricated and tested at the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). The primary objectives of this test were to interrogate the structural capability of the composite test article, and to verify the test-article design and analysis approach for cylinders subjected to axial compression loads. This report contains the descriptions of the test-article design, fabrication, and test. The pre-test modeling and analysis methods, and corresponding results used in support of the test-article design and test planning, are also described. Additional post-test modeling and analysis efforts and results follow. Selected test results are compared to pre-test predictions and post-test analyses.

Adam Przekop↗
NASA NTRS2022

Buckling Test and Analysis of the 8-foot-diameter Sandwich Composite Cylinder Test Article CTA8.3 as Part of the Shell Buckling Knockdown Factor Project: Test Dates 16~19 December 2019

This report describes work that is part of SBKF-the test and analysis results from the third SBKF cylindrical sandwich composite test article, which was designated SBKF-P3-CYL-CTA8.3. This test was the third in a series of tests on sandwich composite cylinders that can be used to experimentally validate analysis methods, which in turn can be used to develop analysis-based shell buckling design guidelines for sandwich composite launch-vehicle cylindrical structures. The primary objectives of this test were to interrogate the structural capability of the composite test article, and to verify the test-article design and analysis approach for cylinders subjected to axial compression and combined compression and bending loads.

Sandwich composite cylinder↗
NASA NTRS2021

Experimental and Analytical Characterization of Fluted-Core Sandwich Composite Structures

As composite materials continue to gain wider acceptance for aerospace primary structures, experimental characterization and analysis methods must evolve, especially if new or underutilized composite structural concepts are to be successfully implemented. One such potentially underutilized concept is the fluted-core sandwich composite, which consists of facesheets separated by angled web members, and has a number of potential advantages over traditional-core (honeycomb, foam, etc.) sandwich composites. However, fluted-core sandwich composites also exhibit a behaviors not seen with traditional-core sandwich composites. For example, stable local buckling that can lead to material failure can occur in the facesheets between webs or in the webs themselves. Additionally, in the direction perpendicular to the webs, the effective transverse-shear stiffness is largely determined by the bending stiffnesses of the facesheets and the webs and is generally much lower than in the direction parallel to the webs. These local buckling and transverse-shear behaviors can have a large influence on material failure and global buckling, respectively. Thus, it is important to accurately characterize and model these behaviors. In this report, a series of experiments designed to elicit some of these fluted-core sandwich composite structural responses is discussed and the results are compared with results from a previously developed finite element analysis approach; qualitative and quantitative agreement between the experiment and analysis is shown.

Marc R. Schultz↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Buckling and Failure Tests of a Subscale Composite Cylinder

A subscale solid laminate composite cylinder 31.5-in. diameter and 47.8 in. long with a [23/0/-23]4S layup known as NDL-1 was designed to fail in buckling and tested in axial compression to collapse twice. The proposed paper will focus on comparing the behavior of NDL-1 from the first test to failure (TTF-1) and the second test to failure (TTF-2). NDL-1 had a peak load of 466.3 kips during TTF-1 and a peak load of 390.4 kips, 15.5% lower, but with a similar stiffness, during TTF-2. Failure initiated at the 200º circumferential location in TTF-1, and at the 30º circumferential location in TTF-2. Though failure initiated at different locations, a similar radial deformation pattern was present just prior to collapse in TTF-1 and TTF-2. A shallow delamination occurred due to the initial failure event in TTF-1, and the damage had no influence on the response of NDL-1 during TTF-2. In the end, it was determined that NDL-1 failed in buckling during TTF-1 and TTF-2, and the second test to failure of NDL-1 highlighted interesting observations with respect to the effect of damage.

Buckling↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Testing of a Composite Conical-Cylindrical Shell

Launch-vehicle shell structures, which can be comprised of both cylindrical and conical sections, are known to be susceptible to buckling due to their large radius-to-thickness ratios. The advancements in composite manufacturing and numerical methods have enabled designers to consider more nontraditional shapes, such as connecting the conical and cylindrical sections with a toroidal transition to create a single-piece conical-cylindrical shell. This single-piece construction eliminates the need for a heavy interface ring between sections and has the potential to save mass. To better understand the buckling behavior, a composite conical-cylindrical shell was designed, fabricated, and tested. Prior to test, a finite element model that included thickness variations and radial imperfections was created. The test article buckled elastically at 251.8 kN, approximately 8.8% higher than the predicted buckling load of 231.4 kN Continued research in conical-cylindrical structures has the potential to expand the design space for launch-vehicle structures and lead to improved designs and reduced weight.

Buckling↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Test and Analysis of a Composite Conical-Cylindrical Shell

Launch-vehicle shell structures, which can be comprised of both cylindrical and conical sections, are known to be susceptible to buckling due to their large radius-to-thickness ratios. The advancements in composite manufacturing and numerical methods have enabled designers to consider more nontraditional shapes, such as connecting the conical and cylindrical sections with a toroidal transition to create a single-piece conical-cylindrical shell. This single-piece construction eliminates the need for a heavy interface ring between sections and has the potential to save mass. To better understand the buckling behavior, a composite conical-cylindrical shell was designed, fabricated, and tested. Prior to test, a finite element model that included thickness variations and radial imperfections was created. The test article buckled elastically at 251.8 kN, approximately 8.8% higher than the predicted buckling load of 231.4 kN Continued research in conical-cylindrical structures has the potential to expand the design space for launch-vehicle structures and lead to improved designs and reduced weight.

Buckling↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Buckling Behavior of Conical-Cylindrical Shells and Design Considerations for Launch-Vehicle Applications

Traditionally, launch vehicles are constructed with a series of buckling-prone thin-walled cylindrical and conical shells, in which the buckling behavior of these shells has been well studied and buckling design guidance exists. Conical-cylindrical shell geometry is now being utilized for launch-vehicle stage adapters and payload adapters due to advances in manufacturing and numerical techniques, but there is no available buckling design guidance for this nontraditional combined geometry. In order to provide design recommendations, the buckling behavior and imperfection sensitivity of conical-cylindrical shells and how it differs from the conical and cylindrical components needs to be better understood. From this premise, it is possible to investigate whether or not the buckling knockdown factor guidelines for conical and cylindrical shells outlined in NASA SP-8019 and NASA SP-8007, respectively, are still applicable. The results in this paper will show that the current recommendations are not appropriate in some cases. In addition, it was observed that the large rotations and displacements near the transition between the cone and cylinder can have a larger effect on the buckling load than the presence of radial imperfections for conical-cylindrical shells, which is different than conical and cylindrical shells. More interesting is the fact that design modifications to increase the buckling capability of a conical-cylindrical shell such as adding reinforcement, which may add mass, will make the shell more sensitive to imperfections. The increased imperfection sensitivity may negate the increase in buckling capability that was thought to be achievable. In the end, it may be more beneficial to design a conical-cylindrical shell in which the buckling behavior is dominated by the more predictable geometric nonlinearity, which may lead to an overall lower buckling load, but a lower knockdown factor may be possible since it will not be as sensitive to the less-known radial imperfections.

Buckling↗