Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Mark J Cintala

Publications and source records attributed to Mark J Cintala.

Experimental Studies on the Effect of Impact Processes on the Formation and Evolution of Amino Acids

Introduction: A critical step in the emergence of life on Earth was the synthesis of larger organic molecules from simple building blocks such as NH3, CO2, H2O, and CH3OH. The presence of amino acids and other complex organics in comets and meteorites demonstrates that widespread organic synthesis likely occurred across the early solar system. Building on previous work [e.g., 1-3], we systematically explore impact-driven chemical evolution of exogenous organics and their precursors. Collisional processes may also have provided a source of energy for the formation of more complex organics from endogenous building blocks. The high flux of impactors to Earth immediately prior to and during the origins of life suggests that impacts could have played a critical role. Key Questions: 1. How are the formation and evolution of amino acids affected by the presence of a mineral matrix during cometary and asteroidal impacts onto the early Earth? 2. Do some minerals (e.g., phyllosilicates) provide a more robust protective framework or reactive surface site for amino-acid formation and/or polymerization? 3. Does the abundance of ices and/or amino acids relative to that of the mineral matrix affect the formation and evolution of amino acids? 4. Are there impact velocities/shock pressures at which formation or polymerization of amino acids is favored or precluded? Experimental Approach: This study systematically examines the conditions under which amino acids and other organic molecules can form, be polymerized, and/or be destroyed during impact events into particulate regolith simulants. Variable parameters include the modal composition of this regolith (silicate matrices, ratios of ices, silicates, and amino acids) and impact velocities/shock pressures. Impacts experiments were performed using the two-stage light-gas gun (LGG), vertical gun (VG), and flat-plate accelerator (FPA) in the Experimental Impact Lab at JSC. FPA experiments were performed over a range of shock pressures (11.3-31.5 GPa) using CM chondrite simulant mixed with amino acids at ratios of 0:10, 1:10, 1:103, and 1:106 (amino acid:host). Techniques for mixing cometary ices have been optimized and test runs have been performed using the LGG (see figure below). Analysis: Post-impact, samples are heated in water to extract amino acids and peptides. Extracts are characterized via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and the mineralogies of solid residues are characterized using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Additional LC-MS and mineralogical analyses are underway.

Eve L Berger↗

Experimental Impacts into Strength-Layered Targets: Ejecta Kinematics and Crater Morphometry

Impact craters can serve as probes of the subsurface structure of a planetary body and provide hints about a target's properties. Crater morphology, for example, can be used to estimate the thickness of a regolith layer above a more competent unit. Small lunar craters in the maria show a morphological progression from a simple bowl shape to flat-floored and concentric as crater diameter increases for a given regolith thickness. The final shape is a result of the subsurface flow-field initiated as the projectile transfers its energy and momentum to the target surface. In strength-layered targets, such as the lunar maria, the substrate modifies the flow field and thereby the excavation of the crater. Here we report on a series of experimental impacts into targets composed of a layer of loose sand above a stronger substrate. As we varied the sand's thickness, we imaged individual ejecta trajectories as the craters grew, from which we derived ejection-speed scaling relationships. In addition, we used a 3D scanner to construct topographic maps of the substrate, pre-impact target, and post-impact surface. This permitted us to examine the final craters' morphologies and morphometries with respect to the original stratigraphy of the target. As expected, craters became shallower and smaller as the sand's thickness decreased, transitioning from bowl-shaped to concentric as observed on the Moon. Subtle and important details show that the stronger substrate affected the subsurface flow-field by redirecting material upward and outward even when the interface was still well below the final crater's floor. Compared to the control target (loose sand only), the stronger substrate below the sand layer resulted in a much more complex pattern of ejecta. While most of the ejected material was still contained within a typical outward-moving curtain, a number of ejected particles moved along low-speed, high-angle (near 90°) trajectories. The number of these high-angle trajectories increased as the sand layer thinned, perhaps implying that self-secondary cratering would require the presence of a strong subsurface layer below the impact site. Such results refine our understanding of crater excavation in layered targets with implications for ejecta deposits and final crater shapes observed on the Moon.

Jennifer L B Anderson↗