Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Mark Potapczuk.
This manual is intended to provide the information necessary for an applications engineer to configure, compile, and execute the GlennICE software. The intent of this document is not to detail the algorithms of the software. The intent of this document is to detail how a user can interact and configure the algorithms of this software in order to produce a desired simulation.
GlennICE (Glenn Icing Computational Environment) is a computational tool designed to calculate ice growth on complex three-dimensional geometries using the input from a user-supplied computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution for the geometry of interest. The NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field is developing this tool to aid those evaluating, designing and certifying aircraft, engines, and aircraft components for flight in icing conditions. This domestically available software is being developed to enable the introduction of new icing physics into a computational environment in a manner that is open for evaluation and eventual use by industry, academia, and other government organizations.
In 2020, NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate commissioned a study of the icing research area to provide a broad and comprehensive assessment of priority needs for NASA and enduring needs for the aviation community. Priority needs were those that supported four key focus areas for NASA Aeronautics—Transonic Truss-Braced Wing, Electrified Aircraft Propulsion, Small-Core Turbine Engine, and High-Rate Composite Manufacturing—as well as other priority areas, such as Advanced Air Mobility, Certification by Analysis, and Commercial Supersonic Technology. Enduring needs were the additional long-term capabilities and expertise identified by the aviation community as being critical for NASA to provide. This study is called an Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) because a large number of icing research needs were identified and analyzed to determine the highest priorities for NASA key focus areas and those that will endure into the future. This report offers a detailed description and results of the AoA study for icing research.
This presentation describes the plans for ice crystal icing and supercooled water icing tests to be conducted in Fall/Winter 2021 at the NASA Icing Research Tunnel. A test article, whose geometry is representative of an inter-compressor duct and strut region of a turbofan engine, has been designed and fabricated for the study of ice crystal icing physics tests. The Simulated Inter-compressor Duct Research Model (SIDRM) will have the ability to heat surfaces to simulate the warm surfaces of the inter-compressor duct within an engine. The test article is instrumented with heaters, heat flux gauges, thermocouples, and pressure taps to measure icing behavior. The aim of these tests is to generate ice shapes on the SIDRM test article under well-characterized conditions. The results of the testing with the SIDRM model will be used to provide icing physics and validation data for development of the engine icing simulation capabilities in GlennICE, the 3D ice prediction tool. This is intended to be a presentation only, and does not have an accompanying paper.
An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a 65 per cent scale version of the mid-span section of the Common Research Model resulting from an exposure to a Supercooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each accretion. Drop distribution effects were evaluated by using the same IRT icing conditions except with either monomodal or bimodal drop distributions. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from equivalent monomodal drop size distributions were obtained and compared. Results indicate that the ice shapes resulting from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions had equivalent mass and volume, as expected with this approach. Note: No audio portion for this record, additionally slide 9 has a playable video but must be downed in order to view.
A research program was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of icing tunnel hybrid model design. A hybrid design is where the full-scale leading edge of a wing section is maintained only to a certain percentage of the local chord, while the aft section of the model is redesigned into a shortened or truncated planform. Ice shape geometries on a full-chord length and hybrid versions of the swept CRM65 wing model were obtained in NASA Icing Research Tunnel and compared. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the ice shapes compared well. On the main part of the ice shape, the hybrid model had larger chordwise extent, resulting in wider ice shape. For the scallop ice shapes, the ice shape heights at attachment line location were identical. For conditions that produced rime shape, hybrid model ice shapes were larger overall, even at the attachment line location. The only location where there was more ice on the full chord model was on the lower surface, downstream of where the hybrid model no longer had full-scale leading edge. For the test conditions where ice mass measurements were acquired for both models, the full-chord models had 11-22% less ice mass than on the hybrid wing. These differences were larger and opposite of those predicted from LEWICE 3D ice prediction calculations. Further investigation is needed in order determine the cause of the differences between the full-chord and hybrid models.
A research program was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of icing tunnel hybrid model design. A hybrid design is where the full-scale leading edge of a wing section is maintained only to a certain percentage of the local chord, while the aft section of the model is redesigned into a shortened or truncated planform. Ice shape geometries on a full-chord length and hybrid versions of the swept CRM65 wing model were obtained in NASA Icing Research Tunnel and compared. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the ice shapes compared well. On the main part of the ice shape, the hybrid model had larger chordwise extent, resulting in wider ice shape. For the scallop ice shapes, the ice shape heights at attachment line location were identical. For conditions that produced rime shape, hybrid model ice shapes were larger overall, even at the attachment line location. The only location where there was more ice on the full chord model was on the lower surface, downstream of where the hybrid model no longer had full-scale leading edge. For the test conditions where ice mass measurements were acquired for both models, the full-chord models had 11-22% less ice mass than on the hybrid wing. These differences were larger and opposite of those predicted from LEWICE 3D ice prediction calculations. Further investigation is needed in order determine the cause of the differences between the full-chord and hybrid models.
This presentation documents results from the LEWICE2D and GlennICE computer codes for the 1st AIAA Ice Prediction Workshop. The results include ice shape comparisons between the code predictions with experimental ice shapes for a limited number of configurations and conditions. The intent of this workshop is to establish a sound baseline of the current capabilities and use this baseline to target the best topics for follow-on workshops.
An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a full-chord length and hybrid versions of a 65 percent scale size of the mid-span section of the Common Research Model resulting from an exposure to a Super-cooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each ice accretion. Drop distribution effects were evaluated by using the same IRT icing conditions except with either monomodal or bimodal drop distributions. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from monomodal distributions of identical cloud droplet Median Volume Diameter (MVD) were obtained and compared. Results indicated that the ice shapes resulting from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions have similar 2D Maximum Combined Cross Section, or MCCS, ice shape around the model leading edge region and equivalent ice mass measurement per unit span to within the IRT SLD cloud calibration uncertainty, as expected with this approach, but the bimodal distributions have distinctly larger ice feathers that extended further back on the chord of the model. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the main ice accretions compared well between the full-chord and hybrid models.
An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a full-chord length and hybrid versions of a 65 percent scale size of the mid-span section of the Common Research Model resulting from an exposure to a Super-cooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each ice accretion. Drop distribution effects were evaluated by using the same IRT icing conditions except with either monomodal or bimodal drop distributions. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from monomodal distributions of identical cloud droplet Median Volume Diameter (MVD) were obtained and compared. Results indicated that the ice shapes resulting from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions have similar 2D Maximum Combined Cross Section, or MCCS, ice shape around the model leading edge region and equivalent ice mass measurement per unit span to within the IRT SLD cloud calibration uncertainty, as expected with this approach, but the bimodal distributions have distinctly larger ice feathers that extended further back on the chord of the model. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the main ice accretions compared well between the full-chord and hybrid models
An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a full-chord length and hybrid versions of a 65 percent scale size of the mid-span section of the Common Research Model resulting from an exposure to a Super-cooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each ice accretion. Drop distribution effects were evaluated by using the same IRT icing conditions except with either monomodal or bimodal drop distributions. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from monomodal distributions of identical cloud droplet Median Volume Diameter (MVD) were obtained and compared. Results indicated that the ice shapes resulting from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions have similar 2D Maximum Combined Cross Section, or MCCS, ice shape around the model leading edge region and equivalent ice mass measurement per unit span to within the IRT SLD cloud calibration uncertainty, as expected with this approach, but the bimodal distributions have distinctly larger ice feathers that extended further back on the chord of the model. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the main ice accretions compared well between the full-chord and hybrid models.