Engineering topics

Mark W Hilburger

Publications and source records attributed to Mark W Hilburger.

13 records

NASA NTRS2024

Terrestrial Proving Ground Capabilities Needed for Lunar In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) & Construction Concepts of Operation

Incorporating any new technology or system into a human exploration mission or architecture requires development well in advance of the mission to eliminate technology, cost, and schedule risk concerns. It is often stated that technologies need to be at a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of 6, i.e. ‘system/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment (ground or space)’, by Authority To Proceed (ATP) or by the Preliminary Design Review (PDR) for the mission at the latest. There are two game changing capabilities for sustained human exploration of space that can have a significant effect on the overall exploration architecture and the technologies and systems included in the architecture. The first game changing capability, known as In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU), involves the search for, acquisition, and processing of resources on the Moon and Mars into mission consumables and usable products, and the second is the ability to utilize space resources in the construction of roads, structures, and surface infrastructure. ISRU and surface construction capabilities have the potential to greatly reduce the cost and risk of human exploration while enabling sustained lunar surface and commercial operations. However, ISRU and surface construction systems are complex and must operate in extremely harsh environments, with abrasive regolith and pervasive dust, for long-periods of time, with potentially limited opportunities for maintenance and repair by humans. The complexity of these capabilities and operations also means that there are a limited number of companies that can design, build, and operate end-to-end systems on their own. The majority of the technologies being developed for these systems are by small companies and at the component or subsystem level. With the overarching strategy of the United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) to enable industry to implement ISRU and surface infrastructure for Artemis and space commercialization, it is therefore important to establish processes and capabilities to promote and foster collaborations among large and small companies involved in ISRU and surface infrastructure development. For ISRU and infrastructure systems and capabilities to be used in Artemis missions and future commercial lunar surface operations, a coordinated framework with virtual/physical integration and testing locations, or ‘Proving Grounds’, needs to be established and operated on a regular basis and open to all. This paper will discuss the ISRU and surface construction near and long-term concepts of operations, and review operations and lessons-learned from the previous ISRU analog field tests. From this information, requirements and capabilities will be proposed to support and enable the integration and testing of ISRU and construction systems with industry, academia, and international agencies, as well as what facilities and organizations could help establish these Proving Grounds.

ISRU↗

NASA NTRS2023

Lessons Learned from Large-Scale Aerospace Structural Testing

Large-scale testing of aerospace structures is frequently the final step in a development project to validate the structural performance, and that step typically involves a large cost and time investment. To ensure that the testing provides the required data, avoiding errors that can result in an unsuccessful test and failure to meet objectives is critical. Five lessons learned are presented herein to provide insight to those conducting tests in order to help them avoid known pitfalls that may result in an unsuccessful test. Five large-scale tests are described, and include two composite wing tests, a composite hybrid-wing body center section test, a full-scale 27.5-ft diameter metallic barrel test, and an 8-ft diameter metallic barrel test. Problems identified during the testing and mitigation approaches to solve the problems are presented, then the lessons learned are identified and discussed.

Lessons Learned↗

NASA NTRS2021

Lessons Learned from Large-Scale Aerospace Structural Testing

Please see attached.

Lessons Learned↗

NASA NTRS2021

Modeling and Analysis of Fluted-Core Composite Structures for Aerospace Applications

Fiber-reinforced composites are becoming more frequently used for aerospace applications, and because of mass and stiffness requirements, sandwich composites are often selected where shell-type structures are needed. However, traditional-core sandwich composites can exhibit certain manufacturing and in-service problems that have the potential to be alleviated through the use of other sandwich composite concepts. Fluted-core sandwich composite structures, which consist of integral angled web members with structural radius fillers, or noodles, spaced between laminate face sheets, is one such alternative and is considered herein. Because the noodles can consist of unidirectional fiber and can represent a significant amount of the total fluted-core cross section, accurate prediction of the structural response requires that the noodles be modeled with sufficient detail. Previous work showed that the structural response of fluted-core sandwich composite structures could be accurately represented with detailed finite element analysis using a combination of solid and shell elements. In these models, solid elements were used to represent the noodles and shell elements were used to represent the webs and faces. However, this previous solid-noodle modeling approach was also quite computationally intensive, and therefore not practical for large or complicated structures. In this document, a less computationally intensive shell-noodle approach, wherein the entire fluted-core sandwich composite construction is modeled with shell elements, is discussed and predicted structural responses are compared with those of the solid-noodle approach. It is found that by proper selection of certain geometric parameters (thickness and offset of the shell elements that represent the noodle), the shell-noodle modeling approach can be made “structurally equivalent” to the solid-noodle modelling approach.

Leonard Oremont↗

NASA NTRS2020

Buckling of Thin-Walled Circular Cylinders

Recent industry and NASA experience with the development of launch vehicle structures have indicated a need for updated monographs for the design of buckling-critical structures that account for state-of-the-art structural configurations, material systems, and computational tools. This monograph provides an update to NASA SP-8007 (circa 1965, and 1968) and was prepared under the cognizance of the NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC). It summarizes all significant knowledge and experience accumulated from the NESC Shell Buckling Knockdown Factor (SBKF) Assessment (NESC Assessment #: 07-010-E) to date for use in the design of buckling-critical thin-walled circular cylinders. The format and terminology used in this monograph is similar to previous versions of NASA SP-8007 for ease of understanding and implementation. In addition, as with the design recommendations contained in the previous versions of NASA SP-8007, this monograph is to be regarded as a guideline to design and not as a NASA requirement, unless specified in formal program requirements. Furthermore, it is expected that the guidelines presented in this monograph will be updated as appropriate. Designers are advised to stay abreast of updates in the state-of-the-art and corresponding design criteria.

Buckling↗

NASA NTRS2020

Design and Analysis of Buckling-Critical Large-Scale Sandwich Composite Cylindrical Test Articles

It has long been established in the literature that the buckling response of thin-shell structures can be very sensitive to the presence of small geometric and loading imperfections. The Shell Buckling Knockdown Factor Project (SBKF) was established by the NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) to develop analysis-based shell buckling design recommendations for stiffened-metallic and composite launch-vehicle shell structures. Large-scale buckling tests were used to validate the modeling and analysis methods applied in developing these analysis-based recommendations. Herein, the test article design methodology for 8-ft-diameter, honeycomb-core sandwich composite cylinder validation tests is discussed and cylinder designs are presented. In this methodology, first, the sandwich composite design space was defined using several nondimensional parameters, and the desired test article design space was determined by examining the designs of launch-vehicle cylinder structures. Essentially all test article designs within certain design parameters were generated and then downselected based on simple closed-form failure calculations and the nondimensional design-space parameters. Four of these designs that spanned a significant portion of the design space of interest and had global buckling as the first predicted failure mode were selected and subjected to higher-fidelity finite element analyses (FEAs): shell-element-based analyses, axisymmetric-element-based analyses, and global-local analyses. The analysis flow discussed in this report supported the design objective. As the analysis flow progressed, designs were downselected so the fidelity of the analysis methods, and consequently their computational cost and accuracy, was increased. The selection of the FEA types created an analysis framework where particular methods complemented each other and reduced the uncertainty of the predicted test article responses. The analysis results are illustrated using several designs when the computationally expeditious closed-form analysis stage is discussed. Once this stage is complete, the higher-fidelity FEA types are illustrated using one selected detailed test article design. Both perfect and imperfect test article geometries were considered.

Buckling↗

NASA NTRS2020

A Scaling Methodology Applied to Buckling of Sandwich Composite Cylindrical Shells

Studying buckling behavior of large shell structures through full-scale test articles can be complex and expensive. Therefore, reduced scale structures are often preferred to investigate the buckling behavior. However, designing reduced scale structures that are representative of the full-scale structure can be difficult. An analytical scaling methodology for compression-loaded sandwich composite cylindrical shells based on the nondimensionalization of the buckling equations is presented herein. The methodology is used to develop scaled configurations that show similar buckling responses to the full-scale baseline configuration. Finite element analysis results showed that both a baseline and a scaled configuration buckled similarly, when the nondimensional stiffness, defined as the ratio between the nondimensional load and nondimensional displacement, is matched between the different scale models. Limitations of the methodology are discussed and are believed to be a result of neglecting the flexural anisotropy and the transverse shear compliance. A preliminary failure assessment for the different scales is also considered.

Ines Uriol Balbin↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lessons Learned from Large-Scale Aerospace Structural Testing

Large-scale testing of aerospace structures is frequently the final step in a development project to validate the structural performance, and that typically involves a large cost and time investment. In order to ensure that the testing provides the required data, avoiding errors that can result in an unsuccessful test and failure to meet objectives is critical. Presented herein are five lessons learned to provide insight to those conducting tests in order to help them avoid known pitfalls that may result in an unsuccessful test. Five subject large-scale tests are described, and include two composite wing tests, a composite hybrid-wing body center section test, a full-scale 27.5-ft diameter metallic barrel test, and an 8-ft diameter metallic barrel test. Problems identified during the testing and mitigation approaches to solve the problems are presented, then the lessons learned are summarized.

Lessons Learned↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied