Engineering topics
Martin-Mur, Tomas
Publications and source records attributed to Martin-Mur, Tomas.
Mars 2020 Radiometric Data and Telemetry Processing, Attitude Estimation, and Thruster Calibration for Orbit Determination
The Mars 2020 spacecraft was spin-stabilized during cruise, just like its predecessor, the Mars Science Laboratory. This spinning motion imparts a signature in the radiometric tracking data that must be dealt with in order to properly model the motion of the spacecraft's center of mass. We discuss how the Orbit Determination team pre-processed the data for efficient computations while also providing other benefits such as high-fidelity attitude modeling and on-board clock verification. Finally, we discuss the analysis and results of the in-flight thruster calibration activity.
Mars 2020 Navigation Performance
On February 18, 2021, the Perseverance rover and Ingenuity helicopter demonstration landed at Jezero Crater. The Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) architecture, largely the same used to land Curiosity at Gale Crater on August 6, 2012, required high-fidelity flight dynamics simulation with two independent tools to verify performance. The process for creating the EDL simulation using the Dynamics Simulator for Entry, Descent and Surface landing (DSENDS) tool will be discussed, along with its use for for independent verification of the EDL statistical analysis results and reference trajectory simulation. Analysis and usage details both in development and cruise, along with post-landing assessment of the prediction performance of the simulation, will also be discussed.
Orbit Determination for the Mars 2020 Mission
NASA’s Mars 2020 Mission successfully executed its Martian entry, descent, and landing sequence on February 18, 2021. Spacecraft navigation guided the spacecraft from its launch injection to entry into the Martian atmosphere; to do so, three trajectory correction maneuvers and two onboard state updates were performed. Navigation was required to provide an entry state with a maximum uncertainty of 2.8 km in position and 2.0 m/sec in velocity (3-σ); the flight performance was approximately 900 m and 66 cm/sec (3-σ). This paper presents the orbit determination models, measurements, filter strategies and performance throughout launch, cruise and Mars approach.
Using telemetry to navigate the MarCO cubesats to Mars
The two MarCO “cubesat” spacecraft were launched alongside NASA’s InSight in May 2018, operating primarily as a technology demonstrator for small satellites in deep space, with a nominal (but experimental) mission to provide relay support for the primary spacecraft during entry, descent, and landing at Mars. Due to their small size and experimental nature, extensive use of telemetry beyond that commonly used by deep space missions was necessary to complete adequate orbit determination. In particular, telemetry was valuable in two areas: use of wheel speeds during thruster calibrations to improve knowledge of individual thruster force levels, and the use of propellant temperature and pressure data to correctly model small thrusting events on board the vehicle.
Orbiters, CubeSats, and radio telescopes, oh my; entry, descent, and landing communications for the 2018 InSight Mars lander mission
The Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy, and Heat Transport (InSight) Mars lander mission was launched on May 5th, 2018 and its November 26, 2018 entry, descent, and landing sequence was observed by no less than five separate assets. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) in orbit about Mars, the two Mars Cube One (MarCO) probes flying by, and two radio telescopes back on Earth were all used for this critical event communication coverage. These many paths of communication were enabled via the InSight launch/arrival strategy design, MRO orbital phasing selection, and MarCO trajectory design
A Performance-Based Comparison of Deep-Space Navigation using Optical-Communication and Conventional Navigation Techniques: Small Body Missions
Optical communications may be used in future NASA deep-space missions, resulting in much higher data transfer rates. Those optical communication links could also be used for navigation purposes. The performance of deep-space navigation for an asteroid flyby mission using ground-based optical tracking and conventional navigation techniques was investigated in this work. We present the results of variety of asteroid flyby scenarios including low phase and high phase approach angle flybys, one slow flyby in a Trojan tour mission, and also one slow flyby in a Psyche mission. In this task, four different types of observables were simulated, namely ground-based radiometric, spacecraft on-board optical, ground-based optical tracking of spacecraft (astrometry and 2-way range magnitude), and ground-based asteroid astrometry. Different combinations of these four types of observables were compared with currently in-practice ground-based radiometric/on-board optical measurements. The results showed that the ground-based optical tracking is promising and could be a potential candidate for future deep-space navigation. Precise astrometry is not possible for active comets.
A Performance-Based Comparison of Deep-Space Navigation using Optical-Communication and Conventional Navigation Techniques: Small Body Missions
Optical communications may be used in future NASA deep-space missions, resulting in much higher data transfer rates. Those optical communication links could also be used for navigation purposes. The performance of deep-space navigation for an asteroid flyby mission using ground-based optical tracking and conventional navigation techniques was investigated in this work. We present the results of variety of asteroid flyby scenarios including low phase and high phase approach angle flybys, one slow flyby in a Trojan tour mission, and also one slow flyby in a Psyche mission. In this task, four different types of observables were simulated, namely ground-based radiometric, spacecraft on-board optical, ground-based optical tracking of spacecraft (astrometry and 2-way range magnitude), and ground-based asteroid astrometry. Different combinations of these four types of observables were compared with currently in-practice ground-based radiometric/on-board optical measurements. The results showed that the ground-based optical tracking is promising and could be a potential candidate for future deep-space navigation. Precise astrometry is not possible for active comets.
Deep-Space Navigation Using Optical Communications Systems
Optical communication links using lasers can potentially deliver data rates much higher than those possible using radio frequencies. If optical communications equipment is going to be carried by future deep-space missions, this equipment, with some adaptations, could also be used to perform tracking for trajectory determination. A number of experiments have been performed in Earth orbit and in lunar orbit using optical data links, while other missions have demonstrated optical links over interplanetary distances. Laser ranging using corner cube retroreflectors is a well-established technique that has been used for orbit determination of Earth orbiting spacecraft, for geodesy, and for lunar research, achieving centimeter-level precisions, but it is not a practical method for deep-space distances. There are two main optical tracking types that are being considered for deep-space navigation. The first is optical astrometry of spacecraft: a telescope on the ground images the laser beam coming from a spacecraft against the star background, determining its plane-of-sky position as seen from the observatory. This type will greatly benefit from the release of the high-accuracy star catalog produced by ESA’s Gaia mission, allowing for the generation of plane-of-sky measurements with an accuracy similar to that obtained today using VLBI tracking techniques. The second is optical ranging using active optical systems at both ends of the link, requiring a more careful design of the spacecraft optical communications system. One of the advantages of using optical frequencies is that they are not affected by charged particles in the signal path the way that radio frequencies are, eliminating solar plasma and ionospheric effects from the light-time calculation and the corresponding noise. On the other hand, clouds would preclude any type of optical communication, and daytime light scattering precludes astrometric measurements. This paper presents our analysis so far of the performance that could be achieved using optical data types in a number of deep-space scenarios. One of the questions that we are trying to answer is whether spacecraft equipped with optical communications terminals would also need to carry radio-frequency equipment for navigational purposes. We also want to understand how accurately we will be able to navigate spacecraft in different mission types and phases, and what would be the constraints, advantages, and disadvantages of using optical communications systems for deep-space navigation.
MONTE for Orbit Determination
Monte is the Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s (JPL) signature astrodynamic computing platform. Its main interface is a collection of Python-language libraries that can be used either for one-o analyses or to build high-quality software applications. Perhaps nowhere is Monte’s versatility and excellence better demonstrated than in its use for operational orbit determination (OD). Over the period from 2007 to 2016, Monte was the prime OD solution for fourteen JPL flight projects, and secondary for seven non-JPL projects. These missions span the range of Solar System destinations and operational protocols, yet each were successfully serviced by Monte’s flexible OD library. This paper reviews the missions on which Monte has been used for OD, with an eye toward pointing out the di erent ways it has been deployed to solve unique problems. It also gives an outline of the main elements of the orbit determination library and how they work together to navigate flight missions.
Navigation Using Deep-Space Optical Communication Systems
No abstract available
Navigation Using Deep-Space Optical Communication Systems
This work investigates the deep-space spacecraft navigation performance achievable from tracking data types obtained using optical communication systems. These optical navigation types include ranging between spacecraft and a station on Earth and astrometric measurements of angular position. Two mission scenarios are analyzed: an interplanetary cruise trajectory for a Mars lander (Mars 2020), and a science orbit for a Mars orbiter (MAVEN). Various data types are simulated using comprehensive measurement models, tracking schedules, and geometrical constraints. Sensitivity analyses are performed to assess the effect of various contributors to measurement accuracy and navigation performance. For both of the mission scenarios studied, the optical navigation types yield equivalent or improved performance as compared to traditional radiometric observables, though radiometric data types slightly outperform optical observables during tracking data gaps in the science orbit scenario.
Nanoradian Ground-Based Astrometry, Optical Navigation, and Artificial Reference Stars
Spacecraft carrying optical communication lasers can be treated as artificial stars, whose relative astrometry to Gaia reference stars provides spacecraft positions in the plane-of-sky for optical navigation. To be comparable to current Deep Space Network delta-Differential One-way Ranging measurements, thus sufficient for navigation, nanoradian optical astrometry is required. Here we describe our error budget, techniques for achieving nanoradian level ground-base astrometry, and preliminary results from a 1 m telescope. We discuss also how these spacecraft may serve as artificial reference stars for adaptive optics, high precision astrometry to detect exoplanets, and tying reference frames defined by radio and optical measurements.