Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Marvin, Joseph G.

Publications and source records attributed to Marvin, Joseph G..

15 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2013

Experimental Database with Baseline CFD Solutions: 2-D and Axisymmetric Hypersonic Shock-Wave/Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Interactions

A database compilation of hypersonic shock-wave/turbulent boundary layer experiments is provided. The experiments selected for the database are either 2D or axisymmetric, and include both compression corner and impinging type SWTBL interactions. The strength of the interactions range from attached to incipient separation to fully separated flows. The experiments were chosen based on criterion to ensure quality of the datasets, to be relevant to NASA's missions and to be useful for validation and uncertainty assessment of CFD Navier-Stokes predictive methods, both now and in the future. An emphasis on datasets selected was on surface pressures and surface heating throughout the interaction, but include some wall shear stress distributions and flowfield profiles. Included, for selected cases, are example CFD grids and setup information, along with surface pressure and wall heating results from simulations using current NASA real-gas Navier-Stokes codes by which future CFD investigators can compare and evaluate physics modeling improvements and validation and uncertainty assessments of future CFD code developments. The experimental database is presented tabulated in the Appendices describing each experiment. The database is also provided in computer-readable ASCII files located on a companion DVD.

Database↗
NASA NTRS1996

Turbulence Modeling: Progress and Future Outlook

Progress in the development of the hierarchy of turbulence models for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes codes used in aerodynamic applications is reviewed. Steady progress is demonstrated, but transfer of the modeling technology has not kept pace with the development and demands of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools. An examination of the process of model development leads to recommendations for a mid-course correction involving close coordination between modelers, CFD developers, and application engineers. In instances where the old process is changed and cooperation enhanced, timely transfer is realized. A turbulence modeling information database is proposed to refine the process and open it to greater participation among modeling and CFD practitioners.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1993

A CFD validation roadmap for hypersonic flows

A roadmap for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code validation is developed. The elements of the roadmap are consistent with air-breathing vehicle design requirements and related to the important flow path components: forebody, inlet, combustor, and nozzle. Building block and benchmark validation experiments are identified along with their test conditions and measurements. Based on an evaluation criteria, recommendations for an initial CFD validation data base are given and gaps identified where future experiments would provide the needed validation data.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Dryden lectureship in research, a perspective on CFD validation

A comprehensive approach to CFD validation is presented. Requirements from computational and experimental perspectives are given. Experimental validation is emphasized because it ultimately determines the accuracy of CFD modeling and its application to complex problems. The concepts of building block and benchmark experiments are introduced. The types of measurements required of these experiments and their accuracy determination are explained. Contributions from such experiments toward the development and validation of CFD are reviewed and examples provided. Future challenges and strategies for validation are discussed.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1992

CFD validation experiments for hypersonic flows

A roadmap for CFD code validation is introduced. The elements of the roadmap are consistent with air-breathing vehicle design requirements and related to the important flow path components: forebody, inlet, combustor, and nozzle. Building block and benchmark validation experiments are identified along with their test conditions and measurements. Based on an evaluation criteria, recommendations for an initial CFD validation data base are given and gaps identified where future experiments could provide new validation data.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1992

A CFD validation roadmap for hypersonic flows

A roadmap for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code validation is developed. The elements of the roadmap are consistent with air-breathing vehicle design requirements and related to the important flow path components: forebody, inlet, combustor, and nozzle. Building block and benchmark validation experiments are identified along with their test conditions and measurements. Based on an evaluation criteria, recommendations for an initial CFD validation data base are given and gaps identified where future experiments would provide the needed validation data.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Experiments To Verify Computed Flows

Technical memorandum discusses role of experiments in development of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for prediction of aerodynamic flows.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Progress and challenges in modeling turbulent aerodynamic flows

Progress in modeling external aerodynamic flows achieved by using computations and experiments designed to guide turbulence modeling is presented. The computational procedures emphasize utilization of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations and various statistical modeling approaches. Developments for including the influence of compressibility are provided; they point up some of the complexities involved in modeling high-speed flows. Examples of complementary studies that provide the status, limitations, and future challenges of modeling for transonic, supersonic, and hypersonic flows are given.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1990

CFD validation for aerodynamic flows - Challenge for the '90's

The process of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation is described from two perspectives, numerical error validation and physical model validation. Errors associated with time and space discretization, grid refinement, numerical dissipation, and level of solution convergence, are all possible sources of numerical error. The second aspect of CFD code validation is associated with the governing equations and the physical models, e.g., chemistry and turbulence models. This type of validation requires comparisons with carefully conducted experiments and is the primary aspect of the validation process discussed in this paper. Examples of validation are shown for selected Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes codes for conditions from transonic through hypersonic. Since code applications are becoming more complex, it no longer suffices to use data from surface or integral quantities alone to provide the required validation. Flow field surveys and experimental boundary condition measurements are emerging as critical data that must be obtained for CFD code validation. Progress in the overall level of validation is shown to be improving. However, future challenges remain, some of which are enumerated.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Accuracy requirements and benchmark experiments for CFD validation

The role of experiment in the development of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for aerodynamic flow prediction is discussed. The CFD verification is a concept that depends on closely coordinated planning between computational and experimental disciplines. Because code applications are becoming more complex and their potential for design more feasible, it no longer suffices to use experimental data from surface or integral measurements alone to provide the required verification. Flow physics and modeling, flow field, and boundary condition measurements are emerging as critical data. Four types of experiments are introduced and examples are given that meet the challenge of validation: flow physics experiments; flow modeling experiments; calibration experiments; and verification experiments. Measurement and accuracy requirements for each of these differ and are discussed. A comprehensive program of validation is described, some examples given, and it is concluded that the future prospects are encouraging.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Wind tunnel requirements for computational fluid dynamics code verification

The role of experiment in the development of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for aerodynamic flow field prediction is discussed. Requirements for code verification from two sources that pace the development of CFD are described for: (1) development of adequate flow modeling, and (2) establishment of confidence in the use of CFD to predict complex flows. The types of data needed and their accuracy differs in detail and scope and leads to definite wind tunnel requirements. Examples of testing to assess and develop turbulence models, and to verify code development, are used to establish future wind tunnel testing requirements. Versatility, appropriate scale and speed range, accessibility for nonintrusive instrumentation, computerized data systems, and dedicated use for verification were among the more important requirements identified.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Accuracy requirements and benchmark experiments for CFD validation

The role of experiment in the development of Computation Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for aerodynamic flow prediction is discussed. The CFD verification is a concept that depends on closely coordinated planning between computational and experimental disciplines. Because code applications are becoming more complex and their potential for design more feasible, it no longer suffices to use experimental data from surface or integral measurements alone to provide the required verification. Flow physics and modeling, flow field, and boundary condition measurements are emerging as critical data. Four types of experiments are introduced and examples given that meet the challenge of validation: flow physics experiments; flow modeling experiments; calibration experiments; and verification experiments. Measurement and accuracy requirements for each of these differ and are discussed. A comprehensive program of validation is described, some examples given, and it is concluded that the future prospects are encouraging.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Wind tunnel requirements for computational fluid dynamics code verification

The role of experiment in the development of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for aerodynamic flow field prediction is discussed. Requirements for code verification from two sources that pace the development of CFD are described for: (1) development of adequate flow modeling, and (2) establishment of confidence in the use of CFD to predict complex flows. The types of data needed and their accuracy differs in detail and scope and leads to definite wind tunnel requirements. Examples of testing to assess and develop turbulence models, and to verify code development, are used to establish future wind tunnel testing requirements. Versatility, appropriate scale and speed range, accessibility for nonintrusive instrumentation, computerized data systems, and dedicated use for verification were among the more important requirements identified.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1961

Surface Pressures and Heat Transfer on Unswept Blunt Plates in Helium at High Mach Numbers

Pressure distributions and local convective heat-transfer coefficients on a flat plate at zero angle of attack were measured in helium. Data were obtained with various amounts of leading-edge bluntness at Mach numbers of 12.5 and 14.7. The pressures on a sharp leading-edged plate were not influenced by the leading edge and were predicted by the first-order, hypersonic, weak-interaction theory. Pressures on blunt plates were correlated by introducing the leading-edge Reynolds number as a parameter. Measured heat-transfer coefficients on the sharp plate agreed with predictions obtained form existing exact solutions for hear transfer across the laminar boundary layer. For the blunt plates a comparison of theory with experiment indicated that more knowledge of the flow field between the sock wave and plate surface is necessary before an adequate prediction of convective heat transfer can be made. Shock-wave shapes for the blun plates at a Mach number 12.5 and zero angle of attack were measured. At distances between 2 and 60 leading-edge thicknesses from the shock vertex, the shock-wave shapes were found to be represented by a modified form of the blast-wave analogy.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗