Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Matthew A. Boucher

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew A. Boucher.

Rotorcraft Sound Quality Metric Test 1: Stimuli Generation and Supplemental Analyses

A psychoacoustic test was conducted at the NASA Langley Research Center Exterior Effects Room (EER) to assess annoyance to simulated helicopter sounds over a range of sound quality (SQ) metric values. Initial findings identified important SQ metrics as sharpness, tonality, and fluctuation strength. This document is a supplement to the initial findings in which the following are discussed: (i) a detailed treatment of the sound generation process, (ii) the impact of analyzing results with stimuli measured in the EER instead of the intended synthesized stimuli, (iii) an evaluation of annoyance responses with certification metrics, and (iv) adjunct analyses related to the test methodology.

Psychoacoustic test, psychoacoustics, sound qualit↗

A perceptual evaluation of the efficacy of Sound Exposure Level in the rating of annoyance to helicopter noise

A psychoacoustic test was performed that aimed to test how well Sound Exposure Level (SEL) is at indicating changes in annoyance to helicopter noise for simple changes in design as well as for realistic changes found from flight tests. In particular, SEL was evaluated for auralizations of optimized designs of rotor geometries when compared to a baseline design and for recordings that compare different helicopters and maneuvers. Paired comparisons consisted of the 10dB-down portion of flyovers, which is the same portion used to calculate SEL. When played at the same SEL, annoyance responses showed in which cases SEL is a good indicator as well as when other aspects not included in the calculation of SEL may be important. Annoyance responses for relative differences in SEL allowed the calculation of an Equal Annoyance Point, giving further insight to the performance of SEL. Confidence intervals calculated with Monte Carlo simulations showed when responses are statistically different from the equal SEL comparison and also gave an indication of the necessary reduction for designers to be confident that a low noise design is impactful or that a difference in rotorcraft or maneuver is perceptually favorable.

psychoacoustics↗

Developing Rationale for Experimental Designs Employed During Forthcoming NASA Quesst Mission Community Noise Campaigns

Since the publication of R.A. Fisher’s “The Arrangement of Field Experiments” in 1926, the enumerated principles that contributed to the improvement of agricultural field experiments in the early 20th century (randomization, replication, blocking, and appropriate variation of factors) remain hallmarks of all well-designed clinical trials and scientific endeavors in the 21st century. Beginning in 2026, NASA will conduct community noise campaigns with the first-of-kind X-59 experimental aircraft to 1) demonstrate the possibility of quiet supersonic flight over land and 2) to collect live data about annoyance (a categorical response) in relation to estimated noise levels (an experimental factor) produced by the new noise phenomenon, a low-noise “sonic thump”. The resulting predicted relationship between perceptual response and estimated noise level, e.g., mixed logistic regression or related models in the class of generalized linear (mixed) models, is believed to be a useful policy tool that domestic and international regulators can use when deciding whether existing prohibitions of supersonic flight over land can be replaced with a noise-based limit. The X-59 is engineered with the expectation that annoyance in the tested ranges should be a rare outcome, and, consequently, NASA convened an interdisciplinary team to examine and refine the rationale underlying the experimental design for future community campaigns. In this presentation, we review relevant literature on experiments with rare binary outcomes, relate the deliberations of the NASA team to tenets of good experimental design, and highlight several challenges and operational realities of this ambitious campaign.

Design of Experiments; blocking; randomization; co↗