CLARREO Pathfinder Mission Update and CPF-CERES Intercalibration
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Yolanda Shea↗
Engineering topics
Matthew Little
Publications and source records attributed to Matthew Little.
CLARREO Pathfinder as a SI-traceable Reference for Satellite Intercalibration
The Climate Absolute Radiance and Refractivity Observatory (CLARREO) Pathfinder (CPF) consists of an Earthviewing reflected solar (RS) spectrometer that will measure the Earth-reflected solar radiation from International Space Station with an SI-traceable radiometric uncertainty of 0.3% (1-sigma). The high-accuracy CPF measurements will provide an in-orbit reference for intercalibrating other spaceflight RS instruments. The CPF intercalibration team has been tasked to develop a state-of-the-art approach to calibrate the shortwave channel (300-5000 nm) of the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) instrument and the reflective solar bands (RSB) of the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) instrument, both onboard the NOAA-20 satellite, against the CPF benchmark measurements. The aimed intercalibration methodology uncertainty for both the target instruments is also 0.3%. To meet this stringent intercalibration accuracy, the CPF team has developed methods for mitigating the impacts of spatial, spectral, and angular differences between the intercalibration footprints from the CPF and target instruments. To further alleviate uncertainty, the CPF team will employ Polarization Distribution Models (PDMs) to characterize the polarization state of the Earth-reflected radiance as a function of the intercalibration footprint scene type, solar and viewing geometry, and wavelength. The PDMs will assist in identifying low-polarized scene radiances for meticulously intercalibrating the polarization sensitive VIIRS instrument against the significantly-less polarization-sensitive CPF instrument. This paper will highlight the CPF mission overview, the details of the CPF intercalibration approach, and additional outcomes of the CPF intercalibration studies that may benefit the broader remote sensing community.community.
Hyperspectral↗
Climate Absolute Radiance and Refractivity Observatory (CLARREO) Pathfinder Intercalibration Data Analysis Strategy
One of the prime science objectives of NASA’s Climate Absolute Radiance and Refractivity Observatory (CLARREO) Pathfinder (CPF) mission is to acquire unprecedentedly accurate Système Internationale (SI)-traceable Earth-view measurements that can be used as reference for intercalibrating the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) instruments onboard NOAA-20 satellite. The hyperspectral nature of CPF measurements will significantly reduce spectrally induced biases when intercalibrating multiband or broadband satellite instruments with CPF. This advancement eliminates the requirement for spectral band adjustment factors, representing a substantial improvement in sensor intercalibration studies. The CPF intercalibration team is aiming to achieve a maximum intercalibration methodology uncertainty of 0.3 % (k=1). Our studies have revealed that the most significant contribution to the targeted uncertainty budget originates from the combined effects of spatial and temporal matching errors. Spatial matching error arises from discrepancies in CPF and target instrument pixel resolution and geolocation uncertainty, while temporal matching error is caused by changes in scene radiances over time, occurring between when the target and reference instruments observe the same scenes. To estimate the maximum expected uncertainty contribution from these sources, spatial and temporal matching noise analyses were conducted using algorithmically filtered Landsat 9 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES)-16 ABI CONUS scan data as proxies for CPF and target instruments. In the upcoming conference presentation, we will elaborate on the methodology employed in these experiments, provide details of the data filtering algorithms, and present results of the spatial and temporal matching uncertainty analyses.
Intercalibration↗