Engineering topics

Max Chaiken

Publications and source records attributed to Max Chaiken.

4 records

NASA NTRS2022

Power System Design Trades for a Pressurized Lunar/Mars Rover

To enable future human exploration missions, the lunar surface will serve as a crucial training ground and technology demonstration test site where NASA will prepare for future human missions to Mars and other destinations. Key enablers in this exploration are rover systems intended to operate in both the lunar and Mars surface environments. This study focused primarily on the Mars surface environment because, compared to the near-continuous illumination near the lunar poles, the day/night cycles and the reduced solar illumination on Mars make it much more difficult to use solar power. However, solar power is not the only power generation technology available. Top-level energy studies have shown that a radioisotope power system (RPS) has promise for supplying both power and thermal energy for crewed rovers on both the Moon and Mars. This design study investigates how an RPS could potentially meet the power and thermal needs of a pressurized rover with applications for both destinations. The design focus is on what service an RPS can provide and how it would be integrated into a rover (power and thermal interfaces, placement, radiation shielding, fairing installation on the pad, etc.).

RPS↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mars Opposition Piloted Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP)-Chem Vehicle

Many previous studies have examined sending crews to and from Mars. The most economical involved a ‘conjunction’ class whereby the crew spends around 500 days on Mars surface waiting for a ‘cheap’ return. The total mission time results in a mission duration around 3 years. Given the current demonstrated crew maximum of a 1 year stint on ISS, it is interesting to look at reducing that time to only two years, thus reducing risk and minimizing time in the Martian System. In order to meet such a short mission an ‘opposition’ class Mars mission (which includes a Venus flyby) was chosen. The energy required to perform such a mission in only two years (for the 2036 opportunity at least) is about three times that of the 3 year conjunction mission. The rocket equation clearly shows that this mission would then require several times the propellant of the three-year mission unless the Isp of the propulsion system can be increased. Electric propulsion can provide the 3-10x improvement in Isp but even with a nuclear reactor power levels could approach 10 MWe. As an alternative, a smaller reactor (1.5 MWe class) joined together with a chemical stage was found to allow for using each propulsion system to its best advantage: low thrust in interplanetary space and chemical in the gravity wells of Earth and Mars. Indeed, the use of high Isp, low thrust during the interplanetary leg of the journey’s reduced the required capture/departure ∆Vs by 5-10X. Lowering the NEP power also allowed fitting the power system into a single SLS launch – which limited the radiator area to ~ 2500m^2. For the first look a reactor using fuels created by the SP-100 program with a limit of ~1200K was assumed. Starting in the ‘Lunar Gateway’ also allowed for use of commercial tankers to fuel the vehicle in a relative benign place. A top level summary of the mission design, concept of operations, as well as a conceptual point design of the vehicle is described.

Nuclear Electric Propulsion↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Heat Pipe Development For Space Fission Demonstration Missions

NASA is currently formulating a flight mission that will demonstrate a 10 kWe nuclear electric fission power system for use on the lunar surface. While preliminary mission concepts leverage the successful Kilopower Reactor Using Stirling Technology ground prototype demonstration of a 1 kWe reactor, there are significant engineering challenges associated with adapting that prototype reactor for flight. One of these challenges is to modify the high temperature sodium heat pipes for use in space operation. Ongoing technical work at the NASA Glenn Research Center seeks to address several key areas of heat pipe development, focusing on fluid return under reduced or microgravity conditions and improved interfaces for both the reactor and the power conversion ends of the heat pipe.

Fission↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optimization, Design, and Demonstration of 1 kW Stirling Controller Using Capacitor-based Power Factor Correction

Free-piston Stirling convertors provide efficient, reliable thermal to electric power conversion, provided they are paired with a reliable controller. This paper outlines work underway on design concepts for kilowatt-class controllers. Using passive power factor correction (PFC) this design explores the possibility of reducing programmatic risk through system simplification. Efficiency is maximized through incorporating wide-bandgap gallium nitride (GaN) switches, and passive PFC volume is minimized through the use of polymer multi-layer capacitors. This work is aimed at exploring new approaches for future Stirling controllers.

Christopher Barth↗