Engineering topics

McClenaghan, J.

Publications and source records attributed to McClenaghan, J..

4 records

DOE OSTI2024

Examining transport and integrated modeling predictive capabilities for negative-triangularity scenarios

This paper investigates the predictive capabilities of TGYRO and TGLF models in assessing the performance of negative triangularity (NT) plasmas compared to positive triangularity (PT) plasmas in fusion devices. TGYRO predicts kinetic profiles, while TGLF analyzes turbulent transport. The study reveals that TGYRO reasonably predicts NT profiles similar to PT, although it overpredicts the high-power scenarios where there is increased experimental MHD activity. TGLF analysis finds reduced linear growth rates in NT and altered flux spectra relative to PT. Additionally, the TGLF SAT0 saturation model is observed to predict high-k transport and a reduction of particle transport with the electron temperature gradient. These findings are further corroborated by core-pedestal modeling using the Stability Transport Equilibrium Pedestal workflow, showing stronger confinement improvements in NT, particularly at higher power densities for the SAT0 saturation model. Furthermore, the study underscores the importance of accurately capturing turbulence saturation mechanisms for NT in order to project its performance accurately in fusion reactors.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

DOE OSTI2024

EFIT-Prime: Probabilistic and physics-constrained reduced-order neural network model for equilibrium reconstruction in DIII-D

We introduce EFIT-Prime, a novel machine learning surrogate model for EFIT (Equilibrium FIT) that integrates probabilistic and physics-informed methodologies to overcome typical limitations associated with deterministic and ad hoc neural network architectures. EFIT-Prime utilizes a neural architecture search-based deep ensemble for robust uncertainty quantification, providing scalable and efficient neural architectures that comprehensively quantify both data and model uncertainties. Physically informed by the Grad–Shafranov equation, EFIT-Prime applies a constraint on the current density J tor and a smoothness constraint on the first derivative of the poloidal flux, ensuring physically plausible solutions. Furthermore, the spatial location of the diagnostics is explicitly incorporated in the inputs to account for their spatial correlation. Extensive evaluations demonstrate EFIT-Prime's accuracy and robustness across diverse scenarios, most notably showing good generalization on negative-triangularity discharges that were excluded from training. Timing studies indicate an ensemble inference time of 15 ms for predicting a new equilibrium, offering the possibility of plasma control in real-time, if the model is optimized for speed.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

DOE OSTI2024

Augmenting machine learning of Grad–Shafranov equilibrium reconstruction with Green's functions

This work presents a method for predicting plasma equilibria in tokamak fusion experiments and reactors. The approach involves representing the plasma current as a linear combination of basis functions using principal component analysis of plasma toroidal current densities (J t ) from the EFIT-AI equilibrium database. Then utilizing EFIT's Green's function tables, basis functions are created for the poloidal flux (ψ) and diagnostics generated from the toroidal current (J t ). Similar to the idea of a physics-informed neural network (NN), this physically enforces consistency between ψ, J t , and the synthetic diagnostics. First, the predictive capability of a least squares technique to minimize the error on the synthetic diagnostics is employed. The results show that the method achieves high accuracy in predicting ψ and moderate accuracy in predicting J t with median R 2 = 0.9993 and R 2 = 0.978, respectively. A comprehensive NN using a network architecture search is also employed to predict the coefficients of the basis functions. The NN demonstrates significantly better performance compared to the least squares method with median R 2 = 0.9997 and 0.9916 for J t and ψ, respectively. The robustness of the method is evaluated by handling missing or incorrect data through the least squares filling of missing data, which shows that the NN prediction remains strong even with a reduced number of diagnostics. Additionally, the method is tested on plasmas outside of the training range showing reasonable results.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

DOE OSTI2024

Turbulence link to L-mode, I-mode, and H-mode confinement in the DIII-D tokamak

Understanding the physics of low-confinement (L-), improved-confinement (I-), and high-confinement (H-) modes is critical for fusion reactors. The finding herein reports observations of two types of turbulence coexisting near the L-mode edge, one magnetohydrodynamic (MHD)-like and another micro-tearing mode (MTM)-like, linked to the H-mode and I-mode confinement in the DIII-D tokamak. Ion-scale magnetic and density turbulence is measured using a Faraday-effect radial-interferometer-polarimeter and beam-emission-spectroscopy (BES). Broadband turbulence spectra of up to ~600 kHz are observed in two discharges where transitions between L-mode, I-mode, and H-mode occurs. Turbulence is found to be inversely correlated with confinement, meaning lower turbulence power at higher confinement. Distinctively, the high-frequency (HF, >~100 kHz) magnetic turbulence power changes by the most (55%) during transitions primarily involving energy confinement change, whereas the low-frequency (LF, <~100 kHz) magnetic and density turbulence power changes by the most (80%) during transitions primarily involving particle confinement change. The LF turbulence amplitude oscillates with and leads to deuterium-alpha emission oscillations before an H-mode. These results imply that HF turbulence mainly affects energy confinement whereas LF turbulence can affect particle confinement. The magnetic and density turbulence exhibits coherence up to 0.6 and cross-phase magnitude close to π/2 in most cases, suggesting they have a common origin in both the LF and HF ranges. BES suggests that LF turbulence resides at the edge (ρ = 0.95) and HF turbulence can be at the outer core (ρ = 0.8) or edge (ρ = 0.95). Comparisons of measurements, theory, and gyrokinetic simulations suggest that HF turbulence is MTM-like in all cases, whereas LF turbulence is more consistent with MHD-like modes and the exact instability might change during transitions—except that a drift-wave origin is possible in a low collisionality H-mode. These results suggest that the H-mode involves suppressed MHD-like turbulence, whereas the I-mode mitigates MTM-like turbulence along with largely unchanged MHD-like turbulence.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗