Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Mehdi R. Khorrami

Publications and source records attributed to Mehdi R. Khorrami.

Aeroacoustic Study of a Subscale Large Civil Transport (STAR) Model – Part 2: Validation of Simulated Results

Aeroacoustic measurements of the 26%-scale, semispan Boeing 777-200 Subsonic Transport Aeroacoustic Research (STAR) model tested in the NASA Ames Research Center 40- by 80-foot wind tunnel were used to ascertain the efficacy of high-fidelity simulations to accurately predict noise from the landing gear of large commercial transports. The simulations, conducted with the lattice Boltzmann solver PowerFLOW®, used a digital replica of the STAR model with or without main landing gear deployed and slats and flaps set to their highest deflection angles to represent aircraft during landing. The computations were performed at a Mach number of 0.21, Reynolds number of 8.2 million based on the model mean aerodynamic chord, and other conditions prevalent during the STAR model test. Measured and computed surface pressures were in very good agreement at most port locations on the model, as were global force coefficients, indicating that the simulations captured the impact of main gear deployment on inboard flap loading. Noise sources produced by the main landing gear and high-lift devices were determined via source localization maps generated with CLEAN from synthetic and experimental data. In general, very good agreement between predicted and measured acoustic source location and relative strength was observed in the maps. Comparisons of far-field noise spectra obtained from the CLEAN deconvolution maps showed remarkable agreement between synthetic and experimental broadband noise at low and medium frequencies. Main landing gear sources for model-scale frequencies above 7,000 Hz could not be resolved with the spatial resolution used during the simulations.

airframe noise↗

Aeroacoustic Study of a Subscale Large Civil Transport (STAR) Model – Part 1: Simulations

Results from a computational aeroacoustic study of the Subsonic Transport Aeroacoustic Research (STAR) model are presented. The model, a 26%-scale semispan Boeing 777-200 aircraft, was an inceptive configuration in a comprehensive simulation campaign to accurately predict the airframe noise of a full-scale, large civil transport during landing. The lengthy process of obtaining a high-fidelity, CFD-ready, vetted, digital representation of the model is described in detail. The simulations were performed with the STAR model installed in the NASA Ames 40- by 80-foot full-scale wind tunnel to enable direct comparisons with aerodynamic and acoustic measurements of the model, presented separately in Part 2 of the study. Two versions of the wind tunnel test section were considered. The entire test section was used to simulate the aerodynamic behavior of the model; an open-wall representation of the section was adopted during the acoustic simulations to eliminate wall reflections. To preserve the aerodynamic equivalency of the model for the two simulated tunnel configurations, the open-wall computations were executed at an angle-of-attack one degree higher than that of the corresponding closed-wall tunnel. The effect on aerodynamic behavior of several minor geometry alterations necessary to con-form the simulated to the tested model was assessed – the modifications considerably altered the strength and extent of a flow separation zone on the inboard segment of the flap. Also evaluated was the impact of spatial resolution on aerodynamic and acoustic characteristics of the model – in general, medium resolution was sufficient to establish convergence trends for averaged surface pressure behavior and proper localization of noise sources. After the aeroacoustic characteristics of the baseline configuration were predicted, a toboggan-shaped fairing designed to reduce main landing gear noise was evaluated computationally. Far-field noise spectra for the baseline and toboggan-equipped STAR model were calculated via a Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings integral approach, with flow quantities on a permeable data surface enclosing the source regions used as input. Results from the simulations indicated that, while the fairing reduced gear noise in the near-field, it had a negligible effect on the far-field noise signature of the model. This trend agreed with previously published experimental results obtained during sub-scale, isolated gear tests and full-scale flight tests

airframe noise↗

Aeroacoustic Computations of a Generic Low Boom Concept in Landing Configuration: Part 1 - Aerodynamic Simulations

Computational results are presented for a 15%-scale, full-span, generic low-boom concept aircraft model simulated as installed in the NASA Langley Research Center 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel and in free-air conditions. The simulations were conducted with the lattice Boltzmann solver PowerFLOW® to capture the time-accurate characteristics of the flow. The aerodynamic behavior of the aircraft was investigated with various combinations of flap and landing gear deployments. To replicate the flow speed used during tests of the model, a Mach number of approximately 0.20 was chosen while varying the angle of attack through a limited range. Analyses were performed on local flow quantities, global forces, as well as flow distributions between configurations. Aerodynamic quantities were shown to be sensitive to mesh resolution levels, especially with flap and landing gear systems retracted. When comparing wind tunnel to free-air simulations, the aerodynamic quantities sampled were found to be in good agreement, suggesting that tunnel blockage and model support effects did not adversely impact the aerodynamic behavior of the model during the wind tunnel test. The results of this study improve our understanding of the highly complex, vortical flow generated by configurations with swept, low aspect-ratio wings at speeds encountered during landing operations.

low boom↗

Comparison of Boeing 777 Landing Gear Noise Simulations with Flight Test Data

Acoustic phased microphone array measurements of aircraft flyover noise acquired during the 2005 Quiet Technology Demonstrator II test were used to assess the accuracy of high-fidelity, full-scale simulations of landing gear noise produced by a large civilian aircraft. The simulations, conducted with the lattice Boltzmann solver PowerFLOW®, used a highly accurate digital model of a Boeing 777-300ER aircraft with the nose and main landing gear components replicating the full-scale geometries. The simulations were performed for aircraft parameters that matched those recorded during the flyover test conditions. For benchmarking purposes, several aircraft configurations were simulated: a) nose landing gear deployed with main landing gear and wing high-lift devices stowed, b) nose and main landing gear deployed with wing high-lift devices stowed and c) nose and main landing gear with wing high-lift devices deployed. To facilitate direct comparison with measured data, the simulated data sets were used to generate synthetic pressure records at the same array microphone locations as those used during the flight test. Broadly self-consistent beamforming techniques and procedures were used to process the synthetic pressure records and the measured data. Integration of select regions of the beamform maps containing the nose or main landing gear yielded good agreement between predicted and measured integrated far-field spectra for forward directivity angles where airframe noise is more prominent.

airframe noise↗

Aeroacoustic Computations of a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft: Part 1 – Aero-dynamic and Airframe Noise Simulations

Computational results are presented for an 8%-scale, full-span, transonic truss-braced wing (TTBW) model simulated as installed in the NASA Langley Research Center 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel and in free-air conditions. The simulations were conducted with the lat-tice Boltzmann solver PowerFLOW® to capture the time-accurate characteristics of the flow. The aerodynamic behavior of the aircraft was investigated in the landing configuration, with high-lift devices and landing gear deployed, as well as in the clean (cruise) configuration, with these components stowed. Analyses were performed on local flow quantities, global forces, and time-averaged surface pressures. Aerodynamic quantities were shown to be sensitive to mesh resolution levels, driven by small geometric features inherent to the TTBW model. Flow features of the TTBW model were examined, with the wing/strut configuration of this model presenting unique behaviors generally not found in conventional transport aircraft. Near-field, time-dependent flow quantities obtained from the scale-resolving simulations were used in conjunction with a Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings integral approach to predict the far-field airframe noise signature of this advanced concept. The effects of permeable data sur-face end caps on the far-field noise spectrum in the flyover direction were determined to be negligible.

Transonic Truss-Braced Wing↗

Aeroacoustic Computations of a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft: Part 2 – Acoustic Signature and Noise Source Identification

High-fidelity, time-dependent simulations of a Boeing-designed, transonic, truss-braced-wing aircraft in cruise (clean) and landing configurations are leveraged to generate synthetic microphone-phased-array data for airframe noise prediction and assessment. These data sets are used to compute source localization (beamform) maps to determine the location and strength of primary and secondary airframe noise sources associated with this unique configuration. The synthetic phased-array implementation mimics the setup of a flight test. As this study is ongoing, preliminary integrated far-field spectra for the cruise configuration obtained at multiple spatial resolutions revealed significant tonal content that lacked convergence with increased resolution. The origin of several of these tones and their unusual convergence behavior was traced to the larger-than-normal trailing-edge thickness of the “as-tested” cruise model being simulated. Reducing the trailing-edge thickness to more realistic values eliminated most of the tones at low to moderate frequencies and improved spectrum convergence significantly. Applying lessons learned from the cruise simulations, several modifications to the geometry of the landing configuration were made and are described in this work. Results from permeable and solid Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings surfaces at two different spatial resolutions (coarse and medium) are used to illustrate the major noise sources and determine convergence of the CLEAN integrated noise levels for the entire aircraft as well as major subcomponents. We demonstrate that the low-frequency content of the far-field spectrum is dominated by noise generated from the main landing gear, while the medium- and high-frequency content is dominated by the wing-leading-edge Krueger flaps. Since analysis of the acoustic maps for the landing configuration revealed several clusters of multiple sources along the wing leading edge, “high resolution” processing of the array data was used to distinguish more accurately the locations of sources.

Transonic Truss-Braced Wing↗