Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Melody Avery

Publications and source records attributed to Melody Avery.

Perturbations in Stratospheric Aerosol Evolution Due to the Water-Rich Plume of the 2022 Hunga-Tonga Eruption

The January 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai (HTHH) volcanic eruption injected a relatively small amount of SO2, but significantly more water into the stratosphere than previously seen in the modern satellite record. Here we show that the large amount of water resulted in large perturbations to stratospheric aerosol evolution. Our Community Earth System Model simulation reproduces the enhanced water vapor observed by the Microwave Limb Sounder at pressure levels between 10 and 50 hPa for three months. Compared with a simulation without a water injection, this additional source of water vapor increases OH, which halves the SO2 lifetime. Subsequent coagulation creates larger sulfate particles that double the stratospheric aerosol optical depth. A seasonal forecast of volcanic plume transport in the southern hemisphere indicates this eruption will greatly enhance the aerosol surface area and water vapor near the polar vortex until at least October 2022, suggesting that there will continue to be an impact of the HTHH eruption on the climate system.

Atmospheric science↗

TPSAS-NF1676L-26965-DND

A comprehensive understanding of the spatial and temporal distributions of clouds on a global scale can be best achieved when the vertical distributions and multi-layer occurrence frequencies obtained from active remote sensors are fully integrated with the horizontal distributions currently provided by passive sensors. The Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) satellite lidar onboard the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) spacecraft was specially designed to acquire aerosol and cloud profiles with unprecedented high vertical resolution and accuracy. As a part of the A-Train satellite constellation, CALIPSO has been operating routinely for more than 10 years and continues to provide a wealth of cloud observations to describe the mean state and inter-annual variability. Recently a suite of level 3 (L3) cloud products has been under development by the CALIPSO lidar science working group at the NASA Langley Research Center. These products describe 3-dimensional (3D) cloud occurrence and 3D ice cloud extinction coefficients and ice water content. Future evolution of the products will add observations from the Imaging Infrared Radiometer onboard CALIPSO. Here we present a brief introduction and provide results from a product prototype. We will characterize the inter-annual vertical variability of zonal cloud occurrence and ice water content during the last 10 years. Suggestions and comments are welcome to help us design and provide better cloud climatology products using CALIOP observations for our cloud community.

Xia Cai↗

TPSAS-NF1676L-18612-DND

Can a space-based elastic backscatter lidar and coincident infrared radiometer recognize the varied microphysical properties observed by aircraft-based cloud probes in cirrus clouds? If so, then the global and continuous coverage provided by the satellite instruments can extend the knowledge about cirrus cloud properties gained from intensive aircraft field campaigns. The recent Studies of Emissions and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC4RS) aircraft field mission that occurred during August and September, 2013 is an ideal data set to use to test whether this is possible. During SEAC4RS there was extensive sampling of cirrus clouds occurring in widely varied conditions, including the North American Monsoon, forest fires, midlatitude frontal convection and tropical convection. Aircraft cloud probe sampling (2D-S, FCDP or FSSP, CPI) was performed from three airplanes, often coordinated with remote sensing by an aircraft-based elastic backscatter lidar (CPL). During the mission the CALIPSO satellite also observed these clouds from space with a similar elastic backscatter lidar (CALIOP) and an infrared radiometer (IIR). There are several cases where the airplanes sampled directly along the satellite track, but also many overpasses of the region and these features that were not coincident with the aircraft-based sampling. This presentation seeks to address the question of whether relationships between the cloud particle size distribution measurements and habits observed by the SPEC cloud probes and CPL aircraft lidar parameters can be up-scaled to classify the CALIPSO satellite observations from this region and time period. The lidar can also provide cloud top information and evidence of whether there was irreversible transport of ice and aerosols into the UT/LS.

Melody Avery↗

TPSAS-NF1676L-23557-DND

The Cloud-Aerosol LIdar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) measures both parallel and perpendicular backscatter of linearly polarized 532 nm light from cloud particles in the atmosphere. The perpendicular component of the return signal allows differentiation between cloud layers consisting of spherical water droplets from those with non-spherical ice particles. A two-way distribution of layer-integrated 532 nm total backscatter and the layer-integrated 532 nm depolarization ratio further differentiates between water cloud layers with significant multiple scattering, horizontally-oriented ice particles that cause specular reflections, and randomly-oriented ice particles, as described in Hu et al., 2009. The cloud phase algorithm functions well for the majority of clouds, but there have been some recent changes and improvements that are described in this poster. The impact of the CALIOP viewing angle change from near-nadir (0.3 degrees) to slightly tilted (3.0 degrees) on the optical properties of the various CALIOP cloud particle phases is also shown. A major improvement to the phase algorithm is the limitation of a spatial coherence test for horizontally-oriented ice to cloud layers that have sufficient integrated attenuated backscatter to likely contain HOI. This change reduces a "striping" effect caused by noisiness in the spatial coherence test for thin cloud layers. Additional temperature tests are considered, and the regional and vertical distribution of cloud layers with the various CALIOP cloud phases is shown. Only one cloud particle phase is allowed for each 5 km portion of a cloud layer that is considered by the cloud phase algorithm, so we use in situ aircraft and CloudSat observations to determine how the CALIOP cloud phase algorithm is treating optically and thermally thick clouds, which may be mixed-phase.

Melody Avery↗

Convective Transport and Evolution of Clouds and aerosols in the Asian Summer Monsoon Region

The existence of a persistent layer in the lowermost stratosphere in the Asian Monsoon region is well-known and has been observed by satellites and also in situ by balloon-borne sensors. This aerosol layer has been observed to persist every year by both SAGE sensors and by CALIOP, between the tropopause and the lower boundary of the Junge stratospheric sulfate layer. But how does this layer form and why? Apparently, aerosols are lofted by convection form the Indian and Asian continents, into the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere (UT/LS) area in the middle of a persistent anticyclone associate with the Asian summer monsoon. But some mysteries remain. The top of this aerosol layer is well above the altitude of maximum convective outflow, so why is the top of the aerosol layer so high? Are the aerosols coming from China or from India? And finally, is there an observable impact of these aerosol on thin cirrus distributions in the UT/LS? We explore the interesting difference in altitude between the ATAL layer and the convective cloud top height, using observations from CALIOP and from SAGE. In the process of doing this we examine the accuracy of both CALIOP and SAGE cloud/aerosol discrimination, and the impact of various averaging lengths. We compare the apparent "observational tropopause" with observations from COSMIC, CALIOP (clouds), and with modeled interpolation from MERRA-2. We also compare CALIOP and CloudSat daytime cloud top heights for convective clouds with the vertical aerosol distribution, and evaluate convection in this region as represented by MERRA-2. Finally, and maybe most importantly we compare convective cloud top heights and temperatures with diurnal variability during the most recent years by using observations from the geostationary Himawari satellite. How representative are the twice-daily A-Train observations, when compared to the natural diurnal variability of convection? The goal is to establish the origins of these UT/LS aerosols, whether these aerosol distributions can be completely explained by convective transport, and to evaluate convective lofting of aerosol by models. Ultimately, the convective lofting of aerosols as modeled is needed to explain the Asian Monsoon aerosol distributions. The observations contribute much-needed information to enhance the model accuracy.

clouds↗

Comparison of the CALIPSO Level 3 Ice Cloud Product with the DARDAR and 2C-ICE products

Understanding the vertical distribution of ice clouds is crucial for climate modeling and weather forecasting. Since its launch to space in 2006, the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization instrument (CALIOP) onboard the CALIPSO spacecraft has been providing unprecedented high-quality profiles of ice clouds, especially optically thin cirrus clouds, during both day and night, on a global scale. Recently the lidar science working group at the NASA Langley Research Center delivered a level 3 (L3) ice cloud product which reports monthly statistics of ice cloud extinction coefficient and ice water content on a uniform 3-dimensional spatial grid. This presentation compares the ice cloud climatology derived from this product with two other ice cloud products, namely the raDAR/liDAR(DARDAR) ice cloud product and the CloudSat-CALIPSO Ice Cloud Property Product (2C-ICE). Using processing similar to the CALIPSO L3 product, granules of DARDAR and 2C-ICE data have been processed into monthly statistics for a better comparison. Similarities and differences will be presented and discussed. The findings illustrate the strengths of the different products and help to identify which product might be most appropriate for a given research topic.

Xia Cai↗