Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Mendoza, J. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Mendoza, J. P..

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1989

Aerodynamic analysis of three advanced configurations using the TranAir full-potential code

Computational results are presented for three advanced configurations: the F-16A with wing tip missiles and under wing fuel tanks, the Oblique Wing Research Aircraft, and an Advanced Turboprop research model. These results were generated by the latest version of the TranAir full potential code, which solves for transonic flow over complex configurations. TranAir embeds a surface paneled geometry definition in a uniform rectangular flow field grid, thus avoiding the use of surface conforming grids, and decoupling the grid generation process from the definition of the configuration. The new version of the code locally refines the uniform grid near the surface of the geometry, based on local panel size and/or user input. This method distributes the flow field grid points much more efficiently than the previous version of the code, which solved for a grid that was uniform everywhere in the flow field. TranAir results are presented for the three configurations and are compared with wind tunnel data.

Madson, M. D.↗
NASA NTRS1984

A numerical simulation of three-dimensional flow in an adaptive wall wind tunnel

Numerical simulations of three dimensional flows in a prototype adaptive wall wind tunnel are conducted at the Mach number of 0.6 to investigate: (1) wind tunnel wall interference, (2) active streamline control by varying air removal or injection along the walls, and (3) to develop a method for establishing wall boundary conditions for interference free flows. Wind tunnel wall interference could be controlled by using only the vertical velocity components. For the configuration tested, interference free flow with solid sidewalls can be approximated by using only floor and ceiling blowing/suction.

Mendoza, J. P.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Adaptive-wall wind-tunnel research at Ames Research Center

Adaptive-wall wind-tunnel research is summarized. This research includes small-scale two- and three-dimensional wind-tunnel experiments and numerical experiments with a three-dimensional adaptive-wall simulator. Airflow through the test-section walls is controlled by adjusting the pressures in segmented plenums. Interference free conditions are successfully attained in subsonic and transonic flows. An adaptive wall test section is constructed for the transonic wind tunnel. Wall interference was reduced in the three dimensional experiment at several angles of attack at Mach 0.60. A wing on wall configuration was modeled in the numerical experiments. These flow simulations showed that free air conditions can be approximated by adjusting boundary conditions at only the floor and ceiling of the test section. No sidewall control was necessary.

Schairer, E. T.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Adaptive-wall wind-tunnel research at NASA-Ames Research Center

Adaptive wall wind tunnel research is summarized. Small scale two and three dimensional wind tunnel experiments and numerical experiments with a three dimensional adaptive wall simulator are included. A NACA 0012 airfoil was tested in a 25 by 13 cm slotted wall test section. Airflow through the test section walls was controlled by adjusting the pressures in segmented plenums. Interference free conditions were successfully attained in subsonic and transonic flows. For the three dimensional experiment, the 25 by 13 cm wind tunnel was modified to permit cross stream wall adjustments. The test model was a semispan wing mounted to one sidewall. Wall interference was substantially reduced at several angles of attack at Mach 0.60. A wing on wall configuration was also modeled in the numerical experiments. These flow simulations showed that free air conditions can be approximated by adjusting boundary conditions at only the floor and ceiling of the test section. No sidewall control was necessary. Typical results from these experiments are discussed.

Schairer, E. T.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Interference effects of aircraft components on the local blade angle of attack of a wing-mounted propeller

The aerodynamic interference effects on a propeller operating in the presence of different wing-body-nacelle combinations was studied. The unsteady blade angle of attack variation with azimuth angle by varying the pitch and yaw of the nacelle was minimized. Results indicate for the particular configuration of interest the minimum blade angle of attack variation occurred with the nacelle pitched downward 4.5 deg and yawed inward 3.0 deg.

Mendoza, J. P.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Propeller design by numerical optimization

A computer program designed to optimize propeller characteristics was developed by combining two main programs: the first is the optimization program based on the gradient algorithm; the second is based on a propeller blade element theory and uses an aerodynamics subprogram to approximate the lift and drag characteristics of the NACA 16-series airfoil section. To evaluate the propeller program alone (with its aerodynamics subprogram), propeller characteristics were computed and compared to those from wind tunnel investigations conducted on three different NACA propellers. Although the thrust and power coefficients which were computed using the blade element theory were generally higher than the experimental results for two of the three propellers, the corresponding efficiencies showed good agreement for all three propellers. The propeller optimization program was then used to study the NACA 4-(5)(08)-03 propeller at various Mach numbers from 0.175 to 0.60. Improvements in propeller efficiency and thrust were obtained through the use of the propeller optimization program.

Mendoza, J. P.↗
NASA NTRS1976

An evaluation of the method for determining the Whitham F-function using distributions of downwash and sidewash angles

The method of computing the Whitham F function using distributions of downwash and sidewash angles was evaluated with two different models. F functions which were calculated for a half angle cone cylinder at M infinites = 2.01, using theoretically and experimentally derived flow angles, show that the method is sensitive to small inaccuracies in the measured flow angles. An oblique wing transport model was tested at 0 deg angle of attack at M infinitely = 2.01. In this test, two different probes were used at two different distances from the model. The pressure signature derived from the F function was extrapolated and compared to the pressure signature measured at the distance of 0.87 body lengths with the static pressure probe. The agreement between the two pressure signatures was poor due to the many inaccuracies involved in using a probe designed to measure flow angularity.

Mendoza, J. P.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Effects of forward contour modification on the aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 641-212 airfoil section

Two different forward contour modifications designed to increase the maximum lift coefficient of the NACA 64 sub 1-212 airfoil section were evaluated experimentally at low speeds. One modification consisted of a slight droop of the leading edge with an increased leading-edge radius; the other modification incorporated increased thickness over the forward 35 percent of the upper surface of the profile. Both modified airfoil sections were found to provide substantially higher maximum lift coefficients than the 64 sub 1-212 section. The drooped leading-edge modification incurred a drag penalty of approximately 10 percent at low and moderate lift coefficients and exhibited a greater nosedown pitching moment than the 64 sub 1-212 profile. The upper surface modification produced about the same drag level as the 64 sub 1-212 section at low and moderate lift coefficients and less nosedown pitching moment than the 64 sub 1-212 profile. Both modified airfoil sections had lower drag coefficients than the 64 sub 1-212 section at high lift coefficients.

Hicks, R. M.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Wind tunnel pressure signatures for a 0.0041-scale model of the space shuttle orbiter

Pressure signatures for a 0.0041-scale model of a space shuttle orbiter were measured in a wind tunnel at Mach numbers from 1.30 to 3.02. The model was tested at 10 deg and 25 deg angle of attack and roll angles were varied from 0 deg to 180 deg in 30 deg increments. Comparisons of sonic boom levels were made for a delta wing configuration and for the space shuttle orbiter which were assumed to have identical lengths and entry trajectories. The sonic boom levels for the orbiter were slightly higher than those for the delta wing orbiter. An example is presented showing that the existing data base for the delta wing orbiter can be used to predict the ground level sonic booms for the orbiter.

Mendoza, J. P.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Sonic boom pressure signatures for the space shuttle launch vehicle

Sonic boom pressure signatures were measured in supersonic and hypersonic wind tunnels for models of the space shuttle launch vehicle at 0 deg angle of attack with and without solid body simulations of the exhaust plumes. Data were measured at 30 deg increments in roll angle from 90 deg to 180 deg at Mach numbers from 3.02 to 5.56.

Mendoza, J. P.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Pressure signatures for a .00053 scale model of the Saturn 5-Apollo launch vehicle with simulated exhaust plumes

Wind tunnel pressure signatures are presented for 10 Mach numbers over a range from 3.01 to 7.29 for a .00053-scale model of the Saturn 5 Apollo launch vehicle complete with escape tower and solid body simulated exhaust plumes for each Mach number. The effect of simulated plume length on the wind tunnel pressure signature was investigated at Mach 4.01. An analysis of the error incurred by extrapolating pressure signatures having strong shock waves by weak shock procedures is presented.

Hicks, R. M.↗
NASA NTRS1973

A wind tunnel flight correlation of Apollo 16 sonic boom

A correlation of sonic boom pressure signatures recorded during reentry of the Apollo 16 command module with wind-tunnel signatures extrapolated to flight distances was made for Mach numbers of 1.83 and 9.71. The flight pressure signatures were recorded by microphones located onboard ships positioned near the ground track, whereas the wind tunnel signatures were measured during a test of a 0.016-scale model of the command module. The agreement between estimates based on wind tunnel data and flight measurements was good at the tested Mach numbers.

Garcia, F., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Oblique-wing sonic boom

An investigation was conducted to determine the magnitude of the groundtrack overpressure generated by an oblique-wing transport cruising at Mach 1.4 at 45,000 ft. A conventional swept-wing configuration was included in the study to provide a basis of comparison for the oblique-wing configuration. The results of the investigation have shown that the oblique-wing configuration produces less sonic boom overpressure at cruise lift coefficient than the swept-wing vehicle.

Hicks, R. M.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Some Effects of Wing Planform on Sonic Boom

A wind-tunnel investigation was conducted to determine the effect of wing planform on sonic boom at Mach numbers of 1.7, 2.0, and 2.7. The results of the investigation show that the wing leading-edge sweep is one of the primary planform variables affecting the overpressure characteristics.

Hunton, L. W.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Pressure signatures for the Apollo command module and the Saturn 5 launch vehicle with a discussion of strong shock extrapolation procedures

Wind tunnel pressure signatures measured at Mach 10.1 for model of the Apollo Command Module and at Mach numbers from 3.01 to 7.91 for two models of the Saturn launch configuration are presented. The signatures for the command module were obtained at roll angles ranging from 0 deg to 180 deg. A brief discussion of the extrapolation of strong pressure signatures is included in the report.

Hicks, R. M.↗
NASA NTRS1972

A Wind Tunnel Flight Correlation of Apollo 15 Sonic Boom

A correlation of sonic boom pressure signatures recorded during reentry of the Apollo 15 command module with wind-tunnel signatures extrapolated to flight distances has been made for Mach numbers of 1.16 and 4.57. The flight pressure signatures were recorded by pressure sensors located onboard ships positioned near the ground track while the wind-tunnel signatures were measured during tests of a 0.016-scale model of the command module. The agreement between estimates based on wind-tunnel data and flight measurements was better at Mach 4.57 than at Mach 1.16.

Hicks, R. M.↗