Comparison of LWR Decay Heat Calculations Using ANSI/ANS-5.1-2014 Standard and SCALE
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Mertyurek, Ugur.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This work discusses challenges and approaches to uncertainty analyses associated with the development of a nuclide inventory benchmark for fuel irradiated in a boiling water reactor. The benchmark under consideration is being developed based on experimental data from the SFCOMPO international database. The focus herein is on how to address missing data in fuel design and operating conditions that are important for adequately simulating the time-dependent changes in fuel during irradiation in the reactor. The effects of modeling assumptions and uncertainties in modeling parameters on the calculated nuclide inventory were analyzed and quantified through computational models developed using capabilities in the SCALE code system. Particular attention was given to the impact of the power history and water coolant density on the calculated nuclide inventory, as well as to the effect of geometry modeling considerations not usually addressed in a nuclide inventory benchmark. These considerations include gap closure, channel bow, and channel corner radius, which do not usually apply to regular reactor operation but are relevant for assessing impacts of potential anomalous operating scenarios.
A recently published generalized Bayesian optimization framework has provided a way to retract any or all of the three common assumptions underlying the conventional Generalized Linear Least Squares (GLLS) optimization method based on the concepts introduced in reference two. These assumptions are: 1. Perfection: The model used for data evaluation and the prior probability distribution function (PDF) of generalized* data are perfect; 2. Normality: The prior and posterior PDF are normal; and 3. Linearity: The model is linear. In this work we outline how the framework in 1 could be directly adopted for improved evaluation of nuclear criticality integral benchmark experiments (IBEs) by: 1. Removing the first assumption alone by utilizing the concept of imperfections introduced in 1 to enable evaluation in the presence of discrepancies between the data and model or of missing covariance information by a GLLS method that will be seen as a generalization of the conventional GLLS method employed by the TSURFER code, and by 2. Removing the remaining two assumptions by implement- ing a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method for computation of the posterior PDF in the SAMPLER code, where TSURFER and SAMPLER are the uncertainty quantification (UQ) codes for IBEs in the SCALE code system based on the GLLS, and the stochastic method, respectively.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Commercial light water reactor (LWR) operators and fuel vendors in the United States are pursuing changes to nuclear fuel that include extended enrichment (EE) and accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) designs to further improve reactor safety and plant economics. Extended fuel enrichments above 5% 235 U pin enrichment and up to 10% 235 U are a subset of high assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) that may be deployed in commercial US LWRs in the near term. ATF features, such as cladding coatings or alternative cladding materials, are designed to improve fuel system performance under accident conditions. One goal of EE is to improve fuel cycle economy by enabling fuel to be depleted to higher burnup than the typical current limits (62 gigawatt-days per metric ton of uranium [GWd/MTU]). Adoption of EE, ATF, and high burnup (HBU) fuels in the US commercial fleet requires a clear understanding of the effects on core physics parameters and used fuel isotopic content, as well as confidence in the accuracy of computer code predictions over an expanded range of materials, enrichment, and burnup. A thorough understanding of the applicability and adequacy of benchmark data (e.g., criticality, decay heat, isotopic content) for computer code validation is necessary to ensure that appropriate safety margins are maintained. As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) agreement number 31310019N0008, “SCALE Code Development, Assessment and Maintenance,” the effects of EE, ATF, and HBU are being assessed for selected representative LWR fuel designs. The project is divided into phases, and this report summarizes the findings of the Phase 1 work, which focuses on lattice physics parameter and used fuel isotopic changes for a conventional GE14 10 x 10 boiling water reactor (BWR) design with GNF-2 part length rod patterns to model a modern BWR assembly design.
Polaris is a 2D multigroup lattice physics capability in the SCALE code system used for the analysis of light water reactor fuel designs. In this work, verification and validation results of Polaris in SCALE 6.2 are presented. The SCALE/KENO continuous-energy Monte Carlo code is used as a reference to compare the results of more than 2,000 combinations of pressurized water reactor and boiling water reactor lattice designs and state points. Radiochemical assay measurements were also used to assess the accuracy of depletion calculations. Results show that Polaris, with ENDF/B-VII.1 cross section library, produces accurate lattice physics data for core simulators.
Polaris is a 2-dimensional multigroup lattice physics capability in the SCALE code system for the analysis of light water reactor fuel designs. The goal of light water reactor lattice physics codes is to generate few-group homogenized cross sections for downstream full-core nodal diffusion calculations. Additionally, lattice physics calculations contain three primary components: the cross section processing calculation, the 2D transport calculation, and the depletion calculation. This paper summarizes the calculational methods and their implementation into Polaris, with an emphasis on implementation of the embedded self-shielding method. The accuracy of the embedded self-shielding method depends on the procedure used to generate self-shielding factors on the multigroup library. Numerical benchmarks calculations reveal that the accuracy of Polaris eigenvalue predictions is enhanced by (1) using heterogeneous unit cell models to generate the self-shielding factors on the library and (2) using self-shielding factors for within-group scattering cross section.
This paper overviews the initial results of a new project at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory -- supported via an internal seed funding program -- focused on the development of a novel computational capability, called MAPPER, to support model validation. The MAPPER development aims to eliminate the need for empirical criteria, such as similarity indices, often employed to identify applicable experiments for given application conditions. To achieve that, MAPPER employs an information-theoretic-based approach, based on the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence principle, to combine responses of available or to-be-built experiments with application responses of interest using a training set of samples generated using randomized execution of the experiments and the application high fidelity analysis models. These samples are condensed using reduced order modeling techniques in the form of a joint probability distribution function (PDF) connecting each application response of interest with a new effective experimental response. The initial focus of the MAPPER capability will be to support the confirmatory analysis required for criticality safety analysis of storage facilities which require k-eff biases to be known for safe operation. This paper reports some of the initial results obtained with MAPPER as applied to a set of critical experiments for which existing similarity-based methods have been shown to provide inaccurate estimates of the biases.
This report highlights accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) code assessment activities performed under Project NRCHQ- 60-17-T-0017, Lattice Physics Enhancements and Assessment. ATF covers a broad range of advanced fuel and clad designs for light water reactors (LWRs) to enhance performance under several accident conditions. Several ATF concepts are anticipated to be deployed as lead test rods (LTRs) or lead test assemblies (LTAs) within the next five years. The purpose of this work is to assess the predictive capabilities of NRC neutronics codes that underpin various licensing calculations. ATF designs use different fuel and clad materials compared to standard UO 2 fuel and zirconium-alloy claddings (hereafter UO 2 -Zry). These new materials and geometrical designs need to be assessed to quantify the impact of nuclear data uncertainties on quantities of interest (QOIs) in licensing calculations and the impact of modeling approximations which may be valid for UO 2 -Zry but not for ATF. This report outlines a systematic approach for ATF neutronics code assessment which includes sensitivity and uncertainty (S/U) analysis of nuclear data, identification of experimental benchmark and gaps for code validation, investigation of modeling approximations, and code-to-code comparisons of calculated QOIs against high-fidelity reference continuous energy (CE) Monte Carlo (MC) calculations. This report focuses on the assessment of the SCALE/Polaris lattice physics code for reactor safety analysis. Polaris lattice physics calculations generate few group (FG) cross sections for PARCS full-core calculations. (Full-core analysis, spent fuel analysis, and severe accident analysis will be performed in future work.) The selected ATF concepts for this report include Cr 2 O 3 and Al 2 O 3 -Cr 2 O 3 -doped UO 2 fuel, U 3 Si 2 fuel, FeCrAl cladding, SiC cladding, and Cr-coated cladding.
The use of sensitivity and uncertainty-based techniques has been well-developed in the neutronic community for criticality safety applications. Sensitivity techniques calculate the first-order relative variations in keff due to relative cross-section variations by isotope, reaction type, and incident neutron energy. The result is a vector of sensitivity coefficients which is folded with prior cross-section uncertainties to calculate the so-called similarity indices. Similarity indices are integral quantities which serve as useful mathematical measures for assessing the relevance of existing or new experiments to given application conditions, representing design systems for which the models are to be validated. Despite their importance for a wide range of validation activities, the peer-reviewed literature is non-existent on the development of rigorous verification analysis for their calculated values. Thus, this manuscript proposes a simple non-intrusive method to calculate similarity indices, serving as an independent verification tool for their evaluation. The manuscript derives the theoretical basis for the proposed verification analysis. Next, the verification analysis is applied to the ORNL’s SCALE code suite which employs adjoint-based methods to calculate similarity indices. Numerical experiments using a number of well-known benchmark experiments are employed to verify the calculation of the similarity indices.
A number of advanced reactor concepts and accident-tolerant fuels (ATFs) are under development or in the initial stages of deployment and testing in the nuclear power industry. Many of these concepts incorporate chemical or material forms that have not traditionally been used in the nuclear industry and may present challenges for nuclear criticality safety validation. Sensitivity/uncertainty methods are ideally suited for assessing the applicability of existing critical experiments to these potentially challenging applications. This paper presents two case studies recently completed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) which investigated the use of the TSUNAMI tools within the SCALE code system to perform such assessments.Many advanced reactor concepts include uranium enrichments above 5 wt% 235U but below the 20 wt% limit of low-enriched uranium (LEU). This material, referred to as high assay LEU (HA-LEU), poses difficulties across the entire infrastructure of nuclear power, including enrichment, transportation, fabrication, and storage. A potentially representative transportation package was selected to perform a criticality safety validation assessment for UF6 containing HA-LEU. Sensitivity data were generated using the TSUNAMI-3D sequence, and an assessment of the applicability of a range of critical experiments was performed using the TSUNAMI-IP tool. The critical experiments were drawn from the set of available sensitivity data files distributed with the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) Handbook. The results indicate that a sufficient number of available experiments may be available to perform validations for these systems.Many different cladding materials and fuel dopants are included in ATFs to mitigate the consequences of a loss of coolant accident. Some of these systems have already been fabricated and introduced as lead test assemblies in commercial reactors, while others are still being developed. Several concepts were considered for pressurized-water reactors (PWRs) and boiling-water reactors (BWRs) in comparison to the current Zircaloy and UO2 fuel system. In most of these cases, the ATF materials did not significantly impact the number of applicable experiments for validation. Some fuel and cladding materials were identified, however, which may reduce the number of available experiments and which will increase the nuclear data–induced uncertainty in neutron multiplication.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) have completed a five-year program to investigate burnup credit (BUC) for boiling-water reactor (BWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) stored in storage and transportation systems. The project examined both peak reactivity BUC, also sometimes called gadolinium credit, and extended BWR BUC. Here extended refers to credit for burnups beyond that associated with peak reactivity. The findings related to peak reactivity BUC are summarized in NUREG/CR-7194, and four additional NUREG/CR documents present the results of the studies of extended BWR BUC. The first of these documents, NUREG/CR-7224, presents results of investigations to determine the effects of axial moderator density profiles, control blade use, and axial burnup profiles. Studies on the impact of core operating conditions and assembly-specific depletion conditions are addressed in NUREG/CR-7240, validation of depleted SNF isotopic predictions is addressed in NUREG/CR-7251, and validation of keff calculations for extended BWR BUC are discussed in NUREG/CR-7252. A summary of the entire project, including major conclusions regarding each of the studies, is included in this paper.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Verification and validation results of the SCALE 6.2 lattice physics codes TRITON/NEWT and Polaris are presented. The SCALE/KENO continuous energy Monte-Carlo code is used as a reference to compare results of more than 2,000 combinations of pressurized water reactor and boiling water reactor lattice designs and state points. Radiochemical assay measurements were also used to assess the accuracy of depletion calculations. Results show that Polaris and TRITON/NEWT using ENDF/B_VII.1 produce accurate lattice physics calculations and cross section data for core simulators.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.