Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Meyer, Pimphan A.

Publications and source records attributed to Meyer, Pimphan A..

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Shear Assisted Processing and Extrusion (ShAPE) of Plastics: Recycling and Remolding

Polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) are often disposed as mixed plastic wastes. The challenges in recycling and upcycling these mixed polyolefin wastes lie in the difficulty in separating individual constituents in a cost-effective and scalable manner. Direct recycling the mixed PE and PP wastes in conventional melt-phase extruders typically result in a product with poor properties and low added value, because of immiscibility, phase separation, and lack of crystallinity. Friction extrusion (FE), a solid phase processing technique that has successfully extruded metal matrix composites with desired end products, has never been utilized to address the issue of recycling mixed plastic wastes. In this study, FE was performed on single-stream low-density polyethylene (LDPE), single-stream PP and mixed-stream LDPE+PP. Consolidated filaments of 2.5 mm diameter were extruded from different precursors. The thermal, infrared, and microscopic properties of extruded filaments were measured to evaluate the effects of FE process on the structure of recycled polymers. Meanwhile, the energy efficiency of FE was estimated based on extrusion rates and compared with conventional melt extrusion processes.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2022

Techno-economic analysis of cellulosic ethanol conversion to fuel and chemicals

In this paper, we describe multiple scenarios investigated to assess the techno-economic results of producing fuels from corn stover-derived ethanol and the impact of co-producing higher-value, ethanol-derived n-butanol and 1,3-butadiene to improve economic feasibility. An alternative approach that produces only chemicals from the lignocellulosic-derived ethanol while producing fuels from the residual cell mass, unconverted sugars and lignin using hydrothermal liquefaction and hydrotreating also is described. Our results indicate that the hydrothermal liquefaction pathway has cost advantages relative to pathways that burn lignin from the corn stover conversion process to make ethanol when the associated ethanol stream is used to make only chemicals.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Role of peracetic acid on the disruption of lignin packing structure and its consequence on lignin depolymerisation

Peracetic acid (PAA) is an effective oxidant capable of solubilising lignin and efficiently depolymerising it to selective phenolic compounds; however, the specific role by which PAA initiates the depolymerisation is still elusive. Herein, interaction between PAA and the lignin macromolecule and the consequent structural changes of the latter were studied by characterising the lignin packing structure and its associated changes during the oxidation process. While the lignin packing structure and its changes associated with the PAA-mediated oxidation were probed by X-ray diffraction, the impact of the PAA on different chemical functionalities present in the lignin structure was established by 13 C and 1 H– 13 C heteronuclear single-quantum coherence nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Further, combining the NMR spectroscopy results, and the product distribution, we conclude that the predominant reaction pathway for the oxidative depolymerisation of lignin with PAA is the Baeyer–Villiger oxidation of the ketone formed by the oxidation of the benzylic hydroxyl group adjacent to the β-O-4 linkage. The experimental evidence provided herein corroborated that PAA instigates oxygen insertion to the lignin macromolecule resulting in disruption of its packing structures and facilitates depolymerisation. We also investigated various metal oxide and mixed metal oxide catalysts to identify effective catalysts that further enhance the efficiency of PAA-mediated depolymerisation of lignin and produce selective monomeric phenolic compounds. Techno-economic analysis was also conducted to identify the key parameters associated with this oxidative process that need to be considered for possible commercial application.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2021

Biofuel Options for Marine Applications: Technoeconomic and Life-Cycle Analyses

This study performed technoeconomic and life-cycle analyses to assess the economic feasibility and emission benefits and tradeoffs of various biofuel production pathways as an alternative to conventional marine fuels. We analyzed production pathways for (1) Fischer-Tropsch diesel from biomass and cofeeding biomass with natural gas or coal, (2) renewable diesel via hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids from yellow grease and cofeeding yellow grease with heavy oil, and (3) bio-oil via fast pyrolysis of low-ash woody feedstock. We also developed a new version of the Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation (GREET) marine fuel module for the estimation of life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) and criteria air pollutant (CAP) emissions of conventional and biobased marine fuels. The alternative fuels considered have a minimum fuel selling price between 2.36 and 4.58 $/heavy fuel oil gallon equivalent (HFOGE), and all exhibit improved life-cycle GHG emissions compared to heavy fuel oil (HFO), with reductions ranging from 40 to 93%. The alternative fuels also exhibit reductions in sulfur oxides and particulate matter emissions. Additionally, when compared with marine gas oil and liquified natural gas, they perform favorably across most emission categories except for cases where carbon and sulfur emissions are increased by the cofed fossil feedstocks. The pyrolysis bio-oil offers the most promising marginal CO2 abatement cost at less than $100/tonne CO2e for HFO prices >$1.09/HFOGE followed by Fischer-Tropsch diesel from biomass and natural gas pathways, which fall below $100/tonne CO2e for HFO prices >$2.25/HFOGE. Pathways that cofeed fossil feedstocks with biomass do not perform as well for marginal CO2 abatement cost, particularly at low HFO prices. This study indicates that biofuels could be a cost-effective means of reducing GHG, sulfur oxide, and particulate matter emissions from the maritime shipping industry and that cofeeding biomass with natural gas could be a practical approach to smooth a transition to biofuels by reducing alternative fuel costs while still lowering GHG emissions, although marginal CO2 abatement costs are less favorable for the fossil cofeed pathways.

Greenhouse gas, life cycle assessment, techno-econ↗
DOE OSTI2021

Microalgae Conversion to Biofuels and Biochemical via Sequential Hydrothermal Liquefaction (SEQHTL) and Bioprocessing: 2020 State of Technology

A preliminary techno-economic analysis (TEA) was developed for the fiscal year 2020 state of technology (SOT) assessment to evaluate the benefits and risks for a large-scale microalga hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) system based on most recent testing results. The focus of the study is directed toward the conversion system, which consists of five processes: two-stage sequential HTL (SEQHTL), biocrude upgrading to final fuels, bioprocessing for co-product generation, hydrogen generation, and steam cycle. In this system, algae biomass with corn stover supplement during the lower algae productivity seasons (winter, fall, and spring) to match the maximum algae seasonal production rate in summer is employed to maintain a constant plant capacity in all the seasons. Algae only (summer season) or algae/corn stover blended feedstock (other seasons) are sent to a two-stage SEQHTL process. In stage I, the carbohydrates in the feedstock are extracted and separated from the residual solid. The residual solid from stage I is further converted to biocrude in the SEQHTL stage II step. The biocrude is upgraded to final fuel products in an upgrading process. The extract stream from HTL stage I is sent to the bioprocessing section for co-product generation via fermentation of carbohydrate. Lactic acid (LA) is assumed to be the co-product based on current bioprocessing testing results.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗