Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Meyer, Thomas J.

Publications and source records attributed to Meyer, Thomas J..

MME-based attitude dynamics identification and estimation for SAMPEX

A method is described for obtaining optimal attitude estimation algorithms for spacecraft lacking attitude rate measurement devices (rate gyros), and then demonstrated using actual flight data from the Solar, Anomalous, and Magnetospheric Particle Explorer (SAMPEX) spacecraft. SAMPEX does not have on-board rate sensing, and relies on sun sensors and a three-axis magnetometer for attitude determination. Problems arise since typical attitude estimation is accomplished by filtering measurements of both attitude and attitude rates. Rates are nearly always sampled much more densely than are attitudes. Thus, the absence/loss of rate data normally reduces both the total amount of data available and the sampling density (in time) by a substantial fraction. As a result, the sensitivity of the estimates to model uncertainty and to measurement noise increases. In order to maintain accuracy in the attitude estimates, there is increased need for accurate models of the rotational dynamics. The proposed approach is based on the minimum model error (MME) optimal estimation strategy, which has been successfully applied to estimation of poorly modeled dynamic systems which are relatively sparsely and/or noisily measured. The MME estimates may be used to construct accurate models of the system dynamics (i.e. perform system model identification). Thus, an MME-based approach directly addresses the problems created by absence of attitude rate measurements.

Depena, Juan↗

Additive evaluation criteria for aircraft noise

The occurrence of unexpected aircraft noise events will frequently evoke intense complaints about annoyance over such events. It is recognized that the relationship between the volume of complaints and the corresponding maximum noise levels does in fact depend on the circumstances of the complainants and the time of year. The frequency of occurrence of the respective noise events is also a factor. The possible practical value of the addition of the maximal noise level, to the well-known cumulative noise descriptors L(sub eq), L(sub dn), etc. may be considered. One might start by considering the difference between the L(sub eq) and the average maximal noise level of the twenty loudest single noise events on an average day. A somewhat less sharply focused consideration of the maximum noise levels was adopted. In that standard the scope of noise-mitigation measures is defined generally with reference to L(sub eq). If the average maximal noise level L(sub max) of the entire aircraft fleet mix exceeds the L(sub eq) by more than 20 dB(A) and if more than 20 daily aircraft noise events exceed the L(sub eq) than the difference L(sub max)-20 becomes the key criterion for noise-mitigation measures. A statistical correlation of a large number of data from aircraft-noise-monitoring sensors located both directly underneath and laterally disposed to an aircraft flight-path has supplied a basis for the determination of the distribution of the maximal noise levels about the average value, L(sub max), of each type of aircraft. This distribution is given for the takeoff climb and for the landing approach.

Meyer, Thomas J.↗