Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Michael A Park

Publications and source records attributed to Michael A Park.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2024

FUN3D Manual: 14.1

This manual describes the installation and execution of FUN3D version 14.1, including optional dependent packages. FUN3D is a suite of computational fluid dynamics simulation and design tools that uses mixed-element unstructured grids in a large number of formats, including structured multiblock and overset grid systems. A discretely-exact adjoint solver may be used for formal design optimization, error estimation, and mesh adaptation. FUN3D also offers a reacting, real-gas capability and provides GPU acceleration of many common simulation options.

William K Anderson↗
NASA NTRS2023

FUN3D Manual: 14.0.2

This manual describes the installation and execution of FUN3D version 14.0.2, including optional dependent packages. FUN3D is a suite of computational fluid dynamics simulation and design tools that uses mixed-element unstructured grids in a large number of formats, including structured multiblock and overset grid systems. A discretely-exact adjoint solver may be used for formal design optimization, error estimation, and mesh adaptation. FUN3D also offers a reacting, real-gas capability and provides GPU acceleration of many common simulation options.

William K Anderson↗
NASA NTRS2023

Evaluation of Limiter Functions for Supersonic Applications

Limiters commonly used in the simulations of flows with discontinuities are compared with the new limiter function proposed by Nishikawa using idealized test cases in two dimensions as well as complex three-dimensional problems. The Nishikawa limiter is observed to be consistently the least dissipative in idealized test cases as well as complex practical problems, for both steady and time-dependent problems. In the case of steady simulations, its iterative convergence characteristics are either similar or better than other limiter functions. The nearfield sonic boom signature of a low-boom demonstrator is computed to demonstrate the utility of the Nishikawa limiter function for realistic supersonic aircraft configurations.

Computational fluid dynamics↗
NASA NTRS2022

FUN3D Manual: 14.0

This manual describes the installation and execution of FUN3D version 14.0,including optional dependent packages. FUN3D is a suite of computational fluid dynamics simulation and design tools that uses mixed-element unstructured grids in a large number of formats, including structured multiblock and overset grid systems. A discretely-exact adjoint solver may be used for for-mal design optimization, error estimation, and mesh adaptation. FUN3D also offers a reacting, real-gas capability and provides GPU acceleration of many common simulation options.1

William K Anderson↗
NASA NTRS2020

FUN3D Manual: 13.7

This manual describes the installation and execution of FUN3D version 13.7, including optional dependent packages. FUN3D is a suite of computational fluid dynamics simulation and design tools that uses mixed-element unstructured grids in a large number of formats, including structured multiblock and overset grid systems. A discretely-exact adjoint solver may be used for formal design optimization, error estimation, and mesh adaptation. FUN3D also offers a reacting, real-gas capability and provides GPU acceleration of many common simulation options.

FUN3D↗
NASA NTRS2020

Verification of Anisotropic Mesh Adaptation for Turbulent Simulations over ONERA M6 Wing

Unstructured anisotropic mesh adaptation is known to be an efficient way to control discretization errors in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. Method verification is required to provide the confidence for routine use in production analysis. The current work aims at verification of anisotropic mesh adaptation for RANS simulations over the ONERA M6 wing. The present verification study is performed using four different flow solvers, three different implementations of the metric field, and three mesh mechanics packages. Two of the flow solvers use stabilized finite-element discretizations (FUN3D-SFE and GGNS), one uses finite-volume discretization (FUN3D-FV), and the last one uses mixed finite-volume and finite element discretizations (Wolf). The mesh adaptation is based on an error estimator that aims to control the quadratic error term in the linear interpolation of Mach number. Two sets of adaptations were performed; the first one controls the interpolation error in L2 norm and the second one controls the interpolation error in L4 norm. Convergence studies were performed on the forces and the pitching moment using all four solvers, and the results are compared with previously verified convergence studies on fixed (nonadapted) meshes. Both forces and pitching moment on adapted meshes are found to be converging to the fine mesh values faster than those on fixed meshes. In addition to forces and moments, convergence of surface pressure and skin friction coefficients at various measurement locations on the wing are also presented. Adapted-mesh surface pressure distributions agree with the fine fixed mesh pressure distributions. Adapted-mesh skin friction distributions contain high frequency noise with mean values approaching the fixed mesh pressure skin friction distributions.

Aravind Balan↗
NASA NTRS2020

Sketch-to-Solution: A Case Study in RCS Aerodynamic Interaction

Thanks to recent advances in the fields of anisotropic grid adaptation, error estimation, and geometry modeling, a sketch-to-solution work flow is now possible for viscous computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations. With this workflow, a CFD application engineer provides geometry, boundary conditions, and flow parameters; and the sketch-to-solution process yields a CFD simulation through automatic, error-based, grid adaptation. To explore the benefits of this nascent capability, a conventional manual grid generation work flow is compared to this new automatic grid generation work flow for a given engineering question: What are the aerodynamic interactions caused by the reaction control system (RCS) on an entry vehicle? This case study indicates that while the automatic grid generation sketch-to- solution process is not yet mature, it is preferred over a manual grid generation work flow because it greatly reduces manual labor, eliminates many opportunities for human error, and provides grid sensitivity information.

Bill Kleb↗
NASA NTRS2019

FUN3D Manual: 13.6

This manual describes the installation and execution of FUN3D version 13.6, including optional dependent packages. FUN3D is a suite of computational fluid dynamics simulation and design tools that uses mixed-element unstructured grids in a large number of formats, including structured multiblock and overset grid systems. A discretely-exact adjoint solver enables efficient gradient-based design and grid adaptation to reduce estimated discretization error. FUN3D is available with and without a reacting, real-gas capability. This generic gas option is available only for those persons that qualify for its beta release status.

Robert T Biedron↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploring Unstructured Mesh Adaptation for Hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation

Mesh adaptation methods for the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations are rapidly maturing and beginning to impact the design of aerospace vehicles. RANS turbulence modeling improvements have slowed and may stagnate. Wall-modeled large eddy simulation (LES) and hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES) may provide an improved modeling capability but require specialized expertise to construct appropriate meshes and are considered be too ex-pensive for routine practical use. The realization of the CFD Vision 2030 Study includes improving geometry linkage, mesh generation/adaptation, and turbulence modeling/resolving methods for automated management of errors and uncertainties of physics-based, predictive modeling that can set the stage for ensuring a vehicle is in compliance with a regulation or specification (i.e., certification or qualification by analysis). An exploration of mesh adaptation for HRLES is performed to document synergies and challenges between mesh adaptation and HRLES. Vortex breakdown over a delta wing is examined to show the improvement of HRLES over RANS turbulence modeling approaches. A high lift configuration is shown to demonstrate complex geometry capability. Research and development opportunities are identified to advocate for continuing investments that may allow HRLES to enter routine practical use as a tool for aerospace vehicle analysis and design.

Michael A Park↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Verification of Anisotropic Mesh Adaptation for Complex Aerospace Applications

The stabilized finite element solver, FUN3D-SFE, along with the grid mechanics package refine are verified for aerospace applications of laminar and turbulent flow simulations. The current verification exercise represents an extension of previous research using FUN3D-SFEwith adjoint-based mesh adaptation to generate highly anisotropic adapted meshes for inviscid problems. Adaptations are performed using a solution-based approach that controls the Lpnorm of Mach number interpolation error and an adjoint-based approach that controls the error in some output functional. Adaptive results are shown for laminar subsonic flow over a delta wing, laminar subsonic flow over ONERA M6 wing, inviscid supersonic flow over a sonic boom test case, and a turbulent flow over a high lift configuration (JAXA Standard Model). Mesh convergence results are also compared with results from FUN3D-FV (Finite Volume) whenever available. For all test cases considered, FUN3D-SFE gives significantly better accurate results than FUN3D-FV on coarse meshes.

Aravind Balan↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Verification of Viscous Goal-Based Anisotropic Mesh Adaptation

Adaptive unstructured mesh techniques have a limited, but growing impact on production analysis workflows where the control of discretization error is critical to obtaining reliable simulation results. Recent progress has matured a number of independent implementations of flow solvers, error estimation methods, and anisotropic mesh adaptation mechanics. Anisotropic metric construction methods are evaluated with analytically defined primal and adjoint fields. This allows the comparison of different metric formulations and different implementations of the same formulation without the complications of a flow and adjoint solution method. Unstructured mesh adaptation tools are verified by comparison on analytic primal and dual field before verification on benchmark aerodynamics cases. The documentation of these verification exercises helps to prepare these goal-based methods for routine use in production simulation workflows.

Mesh adaptation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Nearfield Summary and Analysis of the Third AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop C608 Low Boom Demonstrator

A summary and statistical analysis of the nearfield Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) submissions for the Third AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop is provided with a focus on the C608 Low Boom Flight Test Demonstrator. The C608 is more complex in terms of geometry and propulsion boundary conditions than previous workshops cases and is more representative of vehicles with lower ground loudness and the potential for lower annoyance. The nearfield signatures submitted by the participants are propagated to the ground to compute statistics of loudness measures over the vehicle sonic boom carpet. Principle component analysis is used to extract the primary variation modes. Context from previous sonic boom workshops indicates that this workshop has the lowest variation even though the case is more challenging because it is quieter and more complex. The international state-of-the-art results documented in this summary indicates that nearfield CFD variation is low enough for meaningful low-boom design and can contribute toward the discussion of replacing the prohibition of overland supersonic flight with a certification standard.

sonic boom↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Near Field Summary and Analysis of the Third AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop Shock-Plume Interaction Case

This paper will provide a summary and comparison of the results for the shock-plumeinteraction case, also known as the Bi-Convex case, from the 3rd AIAA Sonic BoomPrediction Workshop that was held in January 2020. The paper will include results from theparticipants, analysis of the results against existing experimental data, as well as look as theimpact of grid resolution

Melissa B Carter↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Nearfield Anisotropic Mesh Adaptivity for the Third AIAA Sonic Boom Workshop

The Third AIAA Sonic Boom Workshop provides a unique opportunity to verify nearfield Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tools. The workshop gathered nearfield CFD pressures from families of Mach-aligned, manually-tailored meshes on the C608 Low Boom Flight Test Demonstrator and the shock-plume interaction wind tunnel model. Here two classical adaptive strategies, multiscale and goal-oriented, are compared to the results obtained on tailored grids. The multiscale strategy is implemented independently in two separate toolsets. Details of the adapted mesh density are shown that resolve the complex interaction of boundary layers, shocks, expansions, and vortical structures. Mesh convergence of nearfield pressure signatures and their integral is shown. These detailed comparisons between adapted and manually-tailored meshes and independent implementations of mesh adaptation demonstrate the readiness of these methods for controlling the discretization error of nearfield sonic boom predication.

Julien Vanharen↗