Engineering topics

Michael C Baker

Publications and source records attributed to Michael C Baker.

3 records

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Liquid Hydrogen Tank Chill and No-Vent Fill Prediction Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Cryogenic tank chill and fill is an important cryogenic fluid management (CFM) technology that supports and enables many of NASA’s long-duration space missions. For no-vent fill, the receiver tank pressure remains below the supply tank pressure during the entire duration of the fill so that the tank does not require venting. This is especially advantageous for tank fill operations in low gravity where the position of the liquid is not always known and venting the tank may cause loss of propellant by venting liquid. In lieu of expensive tests conducted on-orbit, accurate computational models capable of predicting receiver tank pressure during cryogenic propellant tank fill may be used to reduce system and propellant mass as well as mission risk. However, these numerical models must be validated or anchored to test data. This study presents a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model with conjugate heat transfer that is used to predict a liquid hydrogen tank chill and no-vent fill ground test conducted at Lewis Research Center (now Glenn Research Center) in 1991. The specific test case chosen for model validation implemented an upward-facing jet near the bottom of a cylindrical 34 liter tank. CFD predictions are compared to experimental measurements of tank pressure, fill level, fluid temperatures, and wall temperatures. The CFD results show reasonable agreement to the test data but overpredict the pressure collapse near the end of the fill despite the liquid jet penetrating the liquid-vapor interface. Several sensitivity studies are considered due to notable uncertainties in the experiment.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Liquid Hydrogen Tank Chill and No-Vent Fill Prediction using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Cryogenic tank chill and fill is an important cryogenic fluid management technology that supports and enables many of NASA’s long-duration space missions. For no-vent fill, the receiver tank pressure remains below the supply tank pressure during the entire duration of the fill so that the tank does not require venting. This is especially advantageous for tank fill operations in low gravity where the position of the liquid is not always known and venting the tank may cause loss of propellant by venting liquid. In lieu of expensive tests conducted on-orbit, accurate computational models capable of predicting receiver tank pressure during cryogenic propellant tank fill may be used to reduce system and propellant mass as well as mission risk. However, these numerical models must be validated or anchored to test data. This study presents computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models with conjugate heat transfer that are used to predict a liquid hydrogen tank chill and no-vent fill ground test conducted at Lewis Research Center (now Glenn Research Center) in 1991. The specific test case chosen for model validation implemented an upward-facing jet near the bottom of a cylindrical 34-liter tank. CFD predictions are compared to experimental measurements of tank pressure, fill level, and wall temperature. The CFD results show reasonable agreement to the test data but overpredict the pressure collapse near the end of the fill despite the liquid jet penetrating the liquid-vapor interface.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Methane Slosh and Drain Experiments

NASA possesses a wealth of historical cryogenic experiments that provide valuable insights into the design, troubleshooting, and understanding involved in the complex fluid and thermodynamics of managing cryogenic propellants. One approach to leveraging these historical datasets is by simulating these experiments to validate the accuracy of simulation environments and constituent models. This study focused on simulating a selection of the K site test series for both static and sloshing pressurized liquid methane draining experiments conducted at NASA in the 1970’s, utilizing computational fluid dynamics. The simulations were performed in the ANSYS FLUENT environment using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) numerical approach. A k-omega turbulence model was used with interfacial turbulence damping, and accurately predicted the amount of pressurant needed to maintain the required tank pressure throughout the static drain. The static simulation predicted the temperature stratification in the ullage observed at the end of the drain. During the methane expulsion with sloshing test, many features were successfully captured using the k-omega turbulence model with interfacial turbulence damping included. The rate of phase change and liquid temperature was overpredicted compared to the experimental measurements. The overprediction may be attributed to uncertainties in the vessel geometry, methane pressurant temperature and composition, and methodological differences in how the sloshing frequency was adjusted during the expulsion.

Cryogenic Propellants↗