Engineering topics

Michael D. Bozeman

Publications and source records attributed to Michael D. Bozeman.

6 records

NASA NTRS2023

Measurement Accuracy and Uncertainty Analysis of the X-59 Air Data Probe Calibration Test Entry One

The X-59 is being developed to demonstrate quiet sonic boom technology. Data was obtained via two test entries in the NASA Glenn Research Center’s 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel to calibrate the X-59’s nose air data probe. The first entry tested two theoretically identical probes with the intention of one of the probes becoming the primary X-59 nose air data probe flight hardware and the other becoming a backup. A measurement accuracy and uncertainty analysis was performed on data obtained from the first test entry. The analysis showed that the uncertainties in the probe pressures were nearly identical for the two probes, with an average difference of 2.51 x 10 -5 for the non-dimensional total pressure and 2.88 x 10 -5 for the non-dimensional static pressures. The analysis also showed that the uncertainty in the probe yaw and pitch angles were 0.00034° and 0.01416°, respectively. This gives confidence in the X-59’s flight air data system.

Air Data Probe↗

NASA NTRS2023

X-59 Sonic Boom Test Results from the NASA Glenn 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel

A wind tunnel test was conducted to investigate near-field sonic boom pressure signatures of the X-59 Low-Boom Flight Demonstrator aircraft. A 1.62%-scale model of the aircraft was fabricated for the wind tunnel test, which took place in the NASA Glenn 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel in September and October 2021. The model had provisions for being mounted by a swept blade strut that attached at top of model ahead of the inlet, or by a rear-entry sting that held the model at the location of the nacelle. The model had alternate parts for ±0.5° deflections of the flaps, ailerons, and stabilator, and ±1° deflections of the T-tail. Off-body static pressure measurements of the flow field below the model were made on a pressure rail which had 420 orifices along its tip. The model was positioned at various heights from the rail by vertical movement of the tunnel strut, and at various longitudinal stations relative to the rail by means of a linear actuator mounted between the wind tunnel strut and the balance. Spatial averaging of model pressure signatures acquired over a range of longitudinal positions reduced the effects of tunnel flow distortions and the interference of the rail flow field and shocks on the model pressure signatures. The test was run at approximate Mach numbers of 1.36, 1.4, and 1.47, and the model was set at various angles of attack and roll relative to the rail. Plots of the model signatures for representative variations of Mach number, model angles, control deflections, and height relative to the rail are provided throughout the report. Repeatability was generally very good and gave confidence in the quality of the measurements. The signatures measured at various heights from the rail provided insight into the aging of the model shocks as they propagated from 1.2 to 3 body lengths from the model. Off-track signatures up to 45° from centerline obtained by rolling the model gave indications of the shock flow fields across the width of the sonic boom carpet. The deflections of the various control surfaces allowed assessment of the boom sensitivity to the control surface movements.

Sonic boom↗

NASA NTRS2022

X-59 Sonic Boom Test Results from the NASA Glenn 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel

A wind tunnel test was conducted to investigate near-field sonic boom pressure signatures from a model of the X-59 Low-Boom Flight Demonstrator aircraft. A 1.62%-scale model of the aircraft in the C612A configuration was fabricated for the wind tunnel test, which took place in the NASA Glenn 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel in September and October 2021. The model had provisions for two different mounting options: a swept blade strut that attached at the top of model ahead of the inlet, and rear-entry sting that was made as one piece with a dummy nacelle, and which had a 2”-long cylindrical segment aft of the nozzle exit before tapering up in size. The blade strut allowed for a clean aft end of the model for evaluation of the shocks from that region, while the sting avoided the significant distortions of the flow and shocks from the blade strut along the top of the model. Both the sting and the strut had adapters that attached to a force balance. The model had alternate parts for ±0.5° deflections of the flaps, ailerons, and stabilator, and ±1° deflections of the T-tail horizontal surface. Off-body static pressure measurements of the flow field below the model were made by use of a pressure rail which had 420 orifices along its tip. The model was positioned at various heights from the rail by vertical movement of the wind tunnel strut, and at various longitudinal stations relative to the rail by means of a linear actuator mounted between the tunnel strut and the balance. The longitudinal positioning allowed multiple pressure signatures to be obtained along different portions of the rail. These signatures were aligned by accounting for the model longitudinal movement and then averaged to take out the effects of tunnel flow distortions and the interference of the rail flow field and shocks on the model pressure signatures. The test was run at approximate Mach numbers of 1.36, 1.4, and 1.47, and the model was set at various angles of attack and roll relative to the rail. Plots of the model signatures for all the variations of Mach number, model angles, control deflections, and height relative to the rail are provided throughout the report. Repeatability was generally very good and gave confidence in the quality of the measurements. The signatures measured at various heights from the rail provided insight into the aging of the model shocks as they propagated from 1.2 to 3 body lengths from the model. Off-track signatures up to 45° from centerline obtained by rolling the model gave indications of the shock flow fields across the width of the sonic boom carpet. The deflections of the various control surfaces allowed assessment of the boom sensitivity to the control surface movements.

Sonic boom↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

CDISC Remote Design Method to Simulate Aircraft Interference Effects for the CATNLF Flight Test

The Crossflow Attenuated Natural Laminar Flow (CATNLF) flight test is an experimental evaluation of a laminar flow design approach that will be conducted on a small transonic wing-like model suspended from the Centerline Instrumented Pylon (CLIP) underneath an F-15 vehicle. The upcoming flight test is anticipated to provide experimental data that may be useful for transition prediction code calibrations or laminar flow computational studies. For the computational results to be reliable, relevant aerodynamics must be included in the simulations. It has been shown that the F-15 vehicle produces a notable aerodynamic influence on the CATNLF test article, and that removing the F-15 vehicle from the simulation significantly alters the laminar flow behavior. Because the F-15 vehicle is not a publicly-releasable geometry, if the CATNLF flight test dataset is to be widely used by the community, an alternative method to ensure that the CATNLF test article flight configuration aerodynamics is properly modeled is required. The objective of this research is to use the CDISC aerodynamic design tool to perform a remote design of a surface that would replicate the aerodynamic influence on the CATNLF test article. This new design approach, referred to as the Equivalent Loading via Interference Surface Effects (ELISE), is presented in this paper, including the details on the design setup and results. The ELISE design successfully reproduced the F-15 influence on the CATNLF test article, with predicted transition location within an average of 4% chord of the full flight configuration. An off-design assessment is included for small perturbations in Mach and sideslip angle that suggest the ELISE design can cover a reasonable range of expected flight conditions with the same geometry. This paper is intended to explain the design approach, as well as show results that can be expected when utilizing the ELISE design method.

CDISC↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Progress Towards the Design of a Natural Laminar Flow Wing for a Low-Boom Concept using CDISC

The X-59 is being developed to evaluate the ability to reduce sonic boom loudness to acceptable levels, with the ultimate goal of enabling supersonic flight overland. If successful, one of the future research challenges will be focused on reducing fuel burn. In this paper, Natural Laminar Flow (NLF) is proposed as a technology to decrease fuel burn for a low-boom configuration. This will require an evaluation of the compatibility of NLF wings for a low-boom configuration. As a first step towards this goal, the CATNLF method was employed using the CDISC design module to perform NLF design on an isolated wing from a low-boom configuration. The results show that the NLF wing features laminar flow over 46% of the wing upper surface, providing a potential 8.3 drag count reduction relative to the design with no laminar flow. Off-design analyses were additionally performed to evaluate the performance of the NLF wing for changes in angle of attack and Mach number. The results showed that the NLF wing offers a performance benefit over the entire range of off-design conditions considered, with most of the laminar flow maintained for near cruise conditions. Future work will consider the full configuration, which will enable an assessment of the impact of the NLF wing design on sonic boom loudness. Additionally, attachment line transition will be addressed, which was predicted to result in a loss of laminar flow on the inboard 50% span for this work. Finally, future research will focus on developing a method for effectively choosing the frequency-beta pairs used for the stability analysis to improve transition prediction and provide a more accurate estimate of the performance benefit.

Supersonic↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Analyses Performed in Support of a Wind Tunnel Test of a Boundary-Layer Ingestion Configuration

Boundary Layer Ingestion (BLI) has been proposed as a technology with the potential to decrease fuel burn. However, one major concern for BLI configurations is the potential degradation of the flow quality, both on the airframe and at the fan face, resulting from the tightly integrated propulsor. A wind tunnel test was performed in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) at the NASA Langley Research Center to investigate the flow quality ingested by a tail cone thruster configuration, similar to the Single Aisle Turboelectric Aircraft Concept with Aft Boundary Layer Ingestion (STARC-ABL). The wind tunnel model was a modified version of the Common Research Model (CRM) to include an aft-mounted, flow-through propulsor. The experimental data obtained from the wind tunnel test provide insight into the flow and enables an assessment of the accuracy of the USM3D-ME flow solver for predicting the flow at the fan face, which will be crucial for fan design purposes. Both grid refinement and turbulence model studies were performed for the Clean and Cruise MFP configurations at the condition corresponding to ReMAC = 5 million, Mach = 0.8, and alpha = 2 deg. The selected grid refinement level and turbulence model were then used to perform simulations over the range of conditions considered in the NTF wind tunnel test. The condition sweep comparisons illustrate favorable agreement with the experimental data over the entire range of conditions and for all Mass Flow Plug (MFP) configurations. The largest differences were observed for the Idle MFP configuration, with approximately 3% difference observed between USM3D-ME and the experimental data. Future work should investigate the impact of higher fidelity turbulence models and grid adaptation on the USM3D-ME predictions.

CRM↗