Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Michael Jones

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Jones.

28 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The PACE-MAPP Algorithm: Simultaneous Aerosol and Ocean Products From Combined Polarimeter and Shortwave Infrared Measurements

PACE-MAPP collaborative algorithm project - Produce accurate aerosol optical and microphysical properties and ocean properties - Use a coupled atmosphere-ocean vector radiative transfer (VRT) model - Use accurate but fast Mie/SS/T-matrix LUTs - Use scientific machine learning to speed-up retrievals by 1000x (PACE-MAPP Neural Network) - PACE-MAPP is a multi-instrument polarimeter algorithm for SPEXone, HARP2, OCI shortwave infrared channels

Snorre Alfred Moen Stamnes↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Acoustic Liners (with a few OSU connections)

A brief overview is presented of conventional and novel acoustic liners for use in flight vehicles from UAVs to commercial aircraft. Differences between local and extended reacting liners are reviewed, with an emphasis on the former. The variety of NASA test rigs used to evaluate acoustic liners is presented, along with a number of novel liner applications. This includes acoustic liners placed in unusual locations, as well as multifunctional considerations. References to a number of contributions to this research area by OSU faculty and students (past and present) are also noted.

acoustic↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Comparison of Impedance Eduction Test Rigs with Different Flow Profiles

The experimental characterization of acoustic liners applied for turbofan engines has been in the spotlight of the community for the last few decades. In general, such characterization is done by measurements of the liner acoustic impedance using different techniques in conditions as close as possible to those encountered in turbofan engines. Although a great amount of work has been published related to these techniques, few comparisons between different experimental setups using identical samples are available. The goal of the present study is to provide a comparison between educed acoustic impedances for two nominally identical liner samples in theUFSC Impedance Test Rig and the NASA Langley Research Center Grazing Flow ImpedanceTube (GFIT). Due to the geometrical differences between the test rigs, it is possible to consider the effect of different grazing flow profiles on the educed impedance. Impedance measurements between the two facilities show similar results in absence of grazing flow, while different ones when the grazing flow is present. Results are presented with both test rigs targeted to two different conditions: (i) same centerline Mach number and; (ii) same average Mach number.Both comparisons suggest a higher acoustic resistance obtained with the UFSC Impedance TestRig. A comparison using semi-empirical predictive models was also conducted. The results suggest that the main source for the observed difference is the grazing flow profile, represented by its boundary layer displacement thickness.

impedance↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparisons of Impedance Prediction Models for Perforate-over-Honeycomb Liners

A large dataset is used to evaluate the efficacy of multiple impedance prediction models for perforate-over-honeycomb liners. Two-factorial analysis is used to explore the relative importance of the key parameters used in these models. Tests are conducted in the NASALangley Normal Incidence Tube and Grazing Flow Impedance Tube with over eighty perforate facesheets at multiple source sound pressure levels, Mach numbers and frequencies. Each prediction model is then compared with this dataset to determine how well each method predicts the measured data. Finally, an optimizer is used to further improve the ability of one of these models to reproduce the measured results.

acoustic↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Comparison of Impedance Eduction Test Rigs with Different Flow Profiles

The experimental characterization of acoustic liners applied for turbofan engines has been in the spotlight of the community for the last few decades. In general, such characterization is done by measurements of the liner acoustic impedance using different techniques in conditions as close as possible to those encountered in turbofan engines. Although a great amount of work has been published related to these techniques, few comparisons between different experimental setups using identical samples are available. The goal of the present study is to provide a comparison between educed acoustic impedances for two nominally identical liner samples in theUFSC Impedance Test Rig and the NASA Langley Research Center Grazing Flow ImpedanceTube (GFIT). Due to the geometrical differences between the test rigs, it is possible to consider the effect of different grazing flow profiles on the educed impedance. Impedance measurements between the two facilities show similar results in absence of grazing flow, while different ones when the grazing flow is present. Results are presented with both test rigs targeted to two different conditions: (i) same centerline Mach number and; (ii) same average Mach number.Both comparisons suggest a higher acoustic resistance obtained with the UFSC Impedance TestRig. A comparison using semi-empirical predictive models was also conducted. The results suggest that the main source for the observed difference is the grazing flow profile, represented by its boundary layer displacement thickness.

impedance↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Experimental Characterization of Acoustic Liners

This presentation provides a review of tools used by the NASA Langley Research Center over the last four decades to experimentally characterize acoustic liners for aircraft noise reduction. Descriptions of past and present NASA test rigs are included to provide context for the application of data acquisition and analysis methods. These test rigs range from simple applications of a raylometer to a waveguide with detailed control over higher-order modes. Methods for impedance eduction based on data acquired in these test rigs are explored in some detail. Strengths and weaknesses of each data acquisition and analysis method are presented, as well as current practices applied in the NASA Langley Liner Technology Facility.

Acoustic Liner↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Investigation of Flow Direction Effects on Impedance Eduction for Acoustic Liners

In support of a collaboration with the International Forum for Aviation Research (IFAR), the NASA Langley Liner Physics Team has acquired a detailed dataset for use in the evaluation of flow direction effects on the acoustic liner impedance eduction process. Measurements are acquired with four acoustic liners designed to cover a range of sensitivities to source sound pressure level and tangential mean flow effects, specifically at source levels of 120 and 140 dB and centerline Mach numbers of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3. These measurements include detailed flow profile surveys upstream and downstream of the liner test window, as well as acoustic pressure data over the extent of the test window. The results clearly demonstrate the importance of the choice of Mach number used in the impedance eduction analysis. Average Mach number differences of less than 0.01 result in significant variation in the educed impedance spectra. These data will soon be supplied to the IFAR partners and will be made available for the general public within the next year.

acoustic↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

PACE Microphysical Aerosol Properties from Polarimetry (PACE-MAPP)

We present the Plankton, Aerosols, Clouds and Ecosystems Microphysical Aerosol Properties from Polarimetry (PACE-MAPP) polarimetric remote sensing algorithm developed for the newly launched NASA PACE satellite observing system. The objective of PACE-MAPP is to retrieve detailed fine-mode (marine, pollution and smoke) and coarse-mode (sea-salt and dust) aerosol properties over the ocean for a range of light to heavy aerosol loadings using PACE’s polarimetric-imaging capabilities at multiple angles and wavelengths from the ultraviolet (UV) to the near-infrared (NIR). An additional objective for PACE-MAPP is to discriminate aerosols from thin clouds. The PACE-MAPP polarimetric remote sensing retrieval algorithm uses coupled atmosphere-ocean vector radiative transfer, optimal estimation, artificial intelligence and powerful inherent optical property look-up-tables for the Earth’s aerosol, cloud, and hydrosol particles. PACE-MAPP is the only retrieval algorithm designed to invert aerosol/ocean products using both polarimeters onboard PACE. We present results using PACE-MAPP to retrieve aerosol and ocean remote sensing products from measurements by the Hyper-Angular Rainbow Polarimeter #2 (HARP2) and Spectro-polarimeter for Planetary Exploration one (SPEXone) polarimeter instruments onboard PACE.

Snorre Stamnes↗