Engineering topics

Milholen, William E., II

Publications and source records attributed to Milholen, William E., II.

23 records · Page 2

NASA NTRS1995

Semi-span model testing in the National Transonic Facility

The objectives of the present research are: (1) to develop a computational approach to support semi-span model test techniques in the NTF; and (2) to integrate this approach with the conduct of an experimental test program. To meet these objectives, the following approach is taken. A state-of-the-art three-dimensional Navier-Stokes solver is employed to compute the flow over both a full-span configuration and a semi-span configuration mounted on the sidewall of the tunnel. The computations are validated by making direct comparisons to experimental data for both configurations. Then, the semi-span computational results are compared to the full-span results to document how the flow over the semi-span configuration differs from that over the full-span configuration. The results of this comparative study will be used to provide a conceptual framework within which a semi-spa model test technique may be implemented in the NTF.

Chokani, Ndaona↗

NASA NTRS1993

Semi-span model testing in the National Transonic Facility

A semi-span testing technique has been proposed for the NASA Langley Research Center's National Transonic Facility (NTF). Semi-span testing has several advantages including (1) larger model size, giving increased Reynolds number capability; (2) improved model fidelity, allowing ease of flap and slat positioning which ultimately improves data quality; and (3) reduced construction costs compared with a full-span model. In addition, the increased model size inherently allows for increased model strength, reducing aeroelastic effects at the high dynamic pressure levels necessary to simulate flight Reynolds numbers. The Energy Efficient Transport (EET) full-span model has been modified to become the EET semi-span model. The full-span EET model was tested extensively at both NASA LRC and NASA Ames Research Center. The available full-span data will be useful in validating the semi-span test strategy in the NTF. In spite of the advantages discussed above, the use of a semi-span model does introduce additional challenges which must be addressed in the testing procedure. To minimize the influence of the sidewall boundary layer on the flow over the semi-span model, the model must be off-set from the sidewall. The objective is to remove the semi-span model from the sidewall boundary layer by use of a stand-off geometry. When this is done however, the symmetry along the centerline of the full-span model is lost when the semi-span model is mounted on the wind tunnel sidewall. In addition, the large semi-span model will impose a significant pressure loading on the sidewall boundary layer, which may cause separation. Even under flow conditions where the sidewall boundary layer remains attached, the sidewall boundary layer may adversely effect the flow over the semi-span model. Also, the increased model size and sidewall mounting requires a modified wall correction strategy. With these issues in mind, the semi-span model has been well instrumented with surface pressure taps to obtain data on the expected complex flow field in the near wall region. This status report summarizes the progress to date on developing the semi-span geometry definition suitable for generating structured grids for the computational research. In addition, the progress on evaluating three state-of-the-art Navier-Stokes codes is presented.

Chokani, Ndaona↗

NASA NTRS1992

Numerical modeling of transonic juncture flow

A numerical investigation of the interaction between a wind tunnel sidewall boundary layer and a thin low-aspect-ratio wing has been performed for transonic speeds and flight Reynolds numbers. A three-dimensional Navier-Stokes code was applied to calculate the flowfields. The results indicated that the sidewall boundary layer had a strong influence on the flowfield around the wing. The computed wing pressure distributions showed vast improvements over previous free-air computations, and were in excellent agreement with experimental data. The low momentum of the sidewall boundary layer resulted in higher pressures in the juncture region, which decreased the favorable spanwise pressure gradient. This significantly decreased the spanwise migration of the wing boundary layer. Weak vortices were predicted in both the upper and lower surface juncture regions. These vortices are believed to have been generated by lateral skewing of the streamlines in the approaching boundary layer.

Milholen, William E., II↗

NASA NTRS1991

Comparison of cryogenic wind tunnel, flight, and computational results for a thin, low-aspect-ratio wing

A research program was conducted at NASA Langley Research Center to build and test a thin, pressure instrumented wing. The wing chosen was the canard of the X-29, which has a maximum thickness of 5 percent of chord. The wing has 90 pressure taps and was built utilizing an advanced laminated metal technique. It was tested in the 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel at transonic Mach numbers and over a wide range of Reynolds number. The data are compared with flight data and Navier-Stokes computational results.

Lawing, Pierce L.↗

NASA NTRS1991

Evaluation of a three-dimensional Navier-Stokes solver for transonic flow over a low-aspect-ratio wing mounted in a wind tunnel

A three dimensional Navier-Stokes solver is evaluated for transonic flow over a thin, swept, low-aspect ratio wing. The computational study was undertaken in support of a wind tunnel experimental program. The computational results are compared to experimental surface pressure data obtained in a cryogenic wind tunnel with an adaptive wall test section. The results show favorable agreement over a wide range of conditions, further the numerical results provide additional data of the complex three-dimensional flow field. Differences in the predictions and experiment suggest a need to conduct further experiments to evaluate the adaptive wall testing technique, and to model the tunnel sidewall boundary layer in the computations.

Milholen, William E., II↗