Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Moodie, Nathan

Publications and source records attributed to Moodie, Nathan.

Upscaling Methods Applied to a Fine-Scale Reservoir Model

This study was conducted as part of the Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration (SWP) project to evaluate how upscaling fine-scale simulation models to coarse-scale simulation models impacted the results. The focus was on the Farnsworth Unit (FWU) and its Morrow' B' Sandstone reservoir, specifically the west half of the field. Due to data limitations and the geologic characteristics of the surrounding area, the upscaling was limited to the west half of the FWU rather than a broader basinscale model. The primary aim was to explore how upscaling impacts numerical simulation models, particularly regarding CO 2 -enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and storage capacity predictions. Upscaling was necessary to reduce computational demands when transitioning from high-resolution geological models to coarser grids, as large-scale simulations with finer grids can be computationally prohibitive. This study expands on previous work by the SWP to understand how additional upscaling, applied to already fine-scale numerical simulation models, affects reservoir performance simulations (Ampomah, Balch, & Grigg, 2015). This is key to understanding how loss of resolution can affect coarsescale model results that may be used for large sensitivity analyses, uncertainty quantifications, and training data for machine learning applications.

02 PETROLEUM↗

An integrated approach to derive relative permeability from capillary pressure

Surface tension affects all aspects of fluid flow in porous media. Through measurements of surface tension interaction under multiphase conditions, a relative permeability curve can be determined. Relative permeability is a numerical description of the interaction between two or more fluids and the porous media. It is a critical parameter for various tools that characterize subsurface multiphase flow systems, such as numerical simulation for carbon sequestration, oil and gas development, and groundwater contamination remediation. Therefore, it is critical to get a good statistical distribution of relative permeability in the porous media under study. Empirical formula for determining relative permeability from capillary pressure are already well established but do not provide the needed flexibility that is required to match laboratory-derived relative permeability curves. By expanding the existing methods for calculating relative permeability from capillary pressure data, it is possible to create both two and three-phase relative permeability curves. Mercury intrusion capillary pressure (MICP) data from the Morrow 'B' Sandstone coupled with interfacial tension and contact angle measurements were used to create a suite of relative permeability curves. Furthermore, these curves were then calibrated to a small sample of existing laboratory curves to elucidate common fitting parameters for the formation that were then used to create relative permeability curves from MICP data that does not have an associated laboratory-measured relative permeability curve.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

Pc-to-RP Method

These excel spreadsheets were used to develop the two-phase and three-phase methods for converting capillary pressure to relative permeability. Data was collected by the SWP and literature sources cited in the spreadsheets.

Capillary Pressure↗

Legacy Well Leakage Risk Analysis at the Farnsworth Unit Site

This paper summarizes the results of the risk analysis and characterization of the CO 2 and brine leakage potential of Farnsworth Unit (FWU) site wells. The study is part of the U.S. DOE’s National Risk Assessment Partnership (NRAP) program, which aims to quantitatively evaluate long-term environmental risks under conditions of significant geologic uncertainty and variability. To achieve this, NRAP utilizes risk assessment and computational tools specifically designed to quantify uncertainties and calculate the risk associated with geologic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) sequestration. For this study, we have developed a workflow that utilizes physics-based reservoir simulation results as input to perform leakage calculations using NRAP Tools, specifically NRAP-IAM-CS and RROM-Gen. These tools enable us to conduct leakage risk analysis based on ECLIPSE reservoir simulation results and to characterize wellbore leakage at the Farnsworth Unit Site. We analyze the risk of leakage from both individual wells and the entire field under various wellbore integrity distribution scenarios. The results of the risk analysis for the leakage potential of FWU wells indicate that, when compared to the total amount of CO 2 injected, the highest cemented well integrity distribution scenario (FutureGen high flow rate) exhibits approximately 0.01% cumulative CO 2 leakage for a 25-year CO 2 injection duration at the end of a 50-year post-injection monitoring period. In contrast, the highest possible leakage scenario (open well) shows approximately 0.1% cumulative CO 2 leakage over the same time frame.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

SMART CarbonSAFE Model

The modeling work for this project built upon previous work done for the CarbonSAFE Rocky Mountain Phase I. A geologic and dynamic model was built in Petrel version 2019.3 for the area of the Colorado Plateau near Price, Utah. It is located at the north end of the San Rafael Swell in a natural gas field called Drunkards Wash. The model is 61.5 km east-west and 53 km north to south with 123x106x21 cells, giving a cell dimension of 50x50 m2. The 21 layers in the Z direction are of varying thickness depending on the formation. The Carmel, the seal layer, has 3 layers and is about 200 meters thick around the injection well. The Navajo Sandstone, the principal reservoir, has 5 layers and is about 100 meters thick. The Kayenta has 5 layers and is roughly 50 meters thick and the Wingate, a secondary reservoir, has 5 layers and is 120 meters thick. The base of the model is the Chinle Formation with 3 layers and about 120 meters of thickness..

Carbon Dioxide↗

Morrow1 Model - No Capillary Pressure

Farnsworth Unit (FWU) CO2EOR Eclipse compositional model: Morrow1 model uses the Morrow1 relative permeability curve with no capillary pressure assigned.

capillary pressure↗

Morrow1 Model - with Capillary Pressure

Farnsworth Unit (FWU) CO2EOR Eclipse compositional model: Morrow1 model uses the Morrow1 relative permeability curve with capillary pressure assigned homogeneously

Capillary Pressure↗

Hydrostratigraphic Region 4 Model - with HSUPc

Farnsworth Unit (FWU) CO2EOR Eclipse compositional model: Hydrostratigraphic Region 4 model uses the Morrow2 (UNOCAL) relative permeability curve with capillary pressure assigned heterogeneously by hydrostratigraphic unit

Capillary Pressure↗

Hydrostratigraphic Region 4 Model - with HSU3-4Pc

Farnsworth Unit (FWU) CO2EOR Eclipse compositional model: Hydrostratigraphic Region 4 model uses the Morrow2 (UNOCAL) relative permeability curve with HSU3-4 capillary pressure assigned homogeneously

Capillary Pressure↗

Hydrostratigraphic Region 1 Model

Farnsworth Unit (FWU) CO2EOR Eclipse compositional model: Hydrostratigraphic Region 1 model uses the HS1 relative permeability curves assigned heterogeneously by hydrostratigraphic unit. The model with capillary pressure applies the HS1 curves heterogeneously by hydrostratigraphic unit.

Capillary Pressure↗

Hydrostratigraphic Region 3 Model - with and without HSU Capillary Pressure

Farnsworth Unit (FWU) CO2EOR Eclipse compositional model: Hydrostratigraphic Region 3 model uses the HS3 relative permeability curves assigned heterogeneously by hydrostratigraphic unit. The model with capillary pressure applies the HS3 curves heterogeneously by hydrostratigraphic unit.

Capillary Pressure↗