MAPIT, F3M, and SSPM-L overview
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Moosir, Patrick Michael.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The large upfront capital costs associated with new nuclear facilities is a substantial barrier to future growth. Facility retrofits to accommodate effective nuclear security can be expensive, particularly in facilities with large inventories of bulk nuclear material. The recent and sustained interest in advanced nuclear power presents the opportunity to implement material control and accountancy (MC&A) measures in the design phase to lower the possibility of costly retrofits.
The proliferation resistance optimization (PRO-X) program is actively supporting the design of nuclear systems by developing a framework to both optimize the fuel cycle infrastructure for nuclear reactor (including both advanced reactors (ARs) and research reactors (RRs)) and minimize the potential for production of weapons-usable nuclear material (Figure 1). One area of interest is in the impact a modular approach to bulk handling fuel cycle facilities could have on meeting safeguards requirements to identify future areas of growth within the proliferation resistance space. This study evaluates how changing the number of streams within a fuel cycle facility could impact a facilities ability to meet both domestic and international safeguards requirements.