Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Morgan, Thomas H.

Publications and source records attributed to Morgan, Thomas H..

8 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2019

Coronagraphic Observations of the Lunar Sodium Exosphere January-June, 2017

In order to observe the lunar sodium exosphere out to one-half degree around the Moon, we designed, built and installed a small robotically controlled coronagraph at the Winer Observatory in Sonoita, Arizona. Observations are obtained remotely every available clear night from our home base at Goddard Space Flight Center or from Prescott, Arizona. We employ an Andover temperature-controlled 1.5-angstrom-wide narrow-band filter centered on the sodium D2 line, and a similar 1.5-angstrom filter centered blueward of the D2 line by 3 angstroms for continuum observations. Our data encompass lunations in 2015, 2016, and 2017, thus we have a long baseline of sodium exospheric calibrated images. During the course of three years we have refined the observational sequence in many respects. Therefore this paper only presents the results of the spring, 2017, observing season. We present limb profiles from the south pole to the north pole for many lunar phases. Our data do not fit any power of cosine model as a function of lunar phase or with latitude. The extended Na exosphere has a characteristic temperature of about 2250–6750 degrees Kelvin, indicative of a partially escaping exosphere. The hot escaping component may be indicative of a mixture of impact vaporization and a sputtered component.

Moon↗
NASA NTRS2012

Observations and Models of the Lunar Sodium Exosphere 1988 - 1999

Sodium in the lunar exosphere is easily observed from the Earth's surface due to its strong resonance emission lines in the visible region of the spectrum. Although sodium is a trace element, it is easily ejected from the surface by a number of processes. The variation of this exospheric constituent both spatially and temporally can help to constrain these sources and the loss processes and their timescales. Due to a revival of interest in the Moon and its volatiles, observations of the lunar exosphere obtained at the McMath-Pierce solar telescope in 1998 and 1999 have recently been reduced and analyzed. In addition, observations of the lunar sodium exosphere obtained with the Mt. Lemmon Lunar Coronagraph on Mt. Lemmon, Arizona, have also been published. We combine these new data with data previously published and reanalyzed by Sarantos et al. This comprehensive data set will be modeled using both a simple Chamberlain exosphere model and a comprehensive Monte Carlo model.

Killen, Rosemary↗
NASA NTRS2012

Comparing the Atmospheres of Mercury and the Earth's Moon

The exospheres of Mercury and the Earth's Moon are fundamentally similar, but the differences that do exist between them can help us to develop a better understanding of the processes at work on the two bodies that produce and remove volatiles. The major differences are derived from (1) the different compositions of the two surfaces, (2) the different particle and field em'ironments above the surface of each body (particularly the presence of intrinsic magnetic field of Mercury), and (3) the larger flux of interplanetary dust incident at the orbit of Mercury. The first difference, surface composition, is the most intractable problem, but the most challenging part of that problem, the composition of the Hermean regolith, may be at least partially addressed as the MESSENGER mission completes work over the next year. Much progress has been made with respect to exploring the second difference above--spacecraft such as Helios, Ulysses, WIND, and ACE have measured the solar wind and its composition both in Earth orbit and at distances encompassing the orbit of Mercury. While our knowledge of the solar wind is incomplete, again it is far more detailed than a simple 1/R(sup 2) law would predict. Another problem is that of the flux of charged particles to the surfaces. While Mercury's magnetosphere is the subject of current study with MESSENGER, the influx of charged particles on the Moon has gone beyond a cos (psi) picture, where psi is the solar zenith angle. We know that the influx of ions at the Moon is affected by magnetic anomalies, by craters, and by surface charging. The third external difference is the differing flux of interplanetary dust incident on the two surfaces. In this talk we will consider: (1) the species that one can compare now for these two exospheres (Na, K, and He); (2) the species that you might be able to compare with future measurements (Ca and Mg); arid (3) how intensive ground-based observations of the easiest lunar species to observe from the ground, Na and K, might help us address source processes at work on both surfaces. We will discuss current and planned modeling efforts for both the lunar and Hermean exospheres, and some current and planned observations, both ground-based and space-based.

Morgan, Thomas H.↗
NASA NTRS2000

Variation of Lunar Sodium During Passage of the Moon through the Earth's Magnetotail

We measured sodium emission above the lunar equator over a range of lunar altitudes from 100 to 4000 km. The measurements were repeated approximately every 24 hours from June 7 to 16, 1998, covering the period during which the Moon passed through the Earth's magnetotail. Sodium temperatures derived from the altitude dependence of emission intensity ranged from 1200 to 2900 K. This result supports the view that photodesorption is a primary source of sodium in the exosphere since the most probable temperature of sodium form this source is in this range. Passage of the Moon through the Earth's magnetotail (where solar wind is essentially absent) affected the sodium density, such that it was higher before the Moon entered the Earth's magnetotail than after the Moon left it. This suggests that the solar wind plays a role in production of lunar sodium. We propose that its function is to mobilize sodium and bring it to the surface, where photodesorption can eject it into the exosphere. A two-step process such as this could help to explain the latitude dependence of sodium density, which varies as the second or higher power of cosine latitude.

Potter, Andrew E.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Maintaining the Na atmosphere of Mercury

The possible sources of the Na atmosphere of Mercury are calculatively studied. The likely structure, composition, and temperature of the planet's upper crust is examined along with the probable flux of Na from depth by grain boundary diffusion and by Knudsen flow. The creation of fresh regolith is considered along with mechanisms for supplying Na from the surface to the exosphere. The implications of the calculations for the probable abundances in the regolith are discussed.

Killen, Rosemary M.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Revived interest in the lunar atmosphere

The recent discoveries of Na and K in the lunar atmosphere are emphasized in a review of lunar atmospheric observations which identifies possible directions of research. Observations are briefly reviewed through the Apollo era which identified the atmosphere as a surface-boundary exosphere, and identified atmospheric constituents included He and Ar which rose and fell by a factor of 20 during the lunar diurnal cycle. Ar-36 and -40 were also identified as were the sources of ionospheric source and sink processes including the solar EUV flux. Na and K are discussed which were identified in a study of the spectroscopic ring effect, and the effects of elemental interaction with the lunar surface can be approximated in laboratory experiments. Observations and measurements of the lunar surface are important for the continued investigation of lunar and other planetary mechanisms.

Morgan, Thomas H.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Revived interest in the lunar atmosphere

Lunar-orbiting spacecraft can use the moon's tenuous atmosphere to directly study the weathering and modification of the lunar surface layer and regolith, to study lunar activity through analysis of released gases, and to search for water that may be essential for lunar base sites. An effort is presently made the historical accumulation and current understanding of lunar atmosphere data, to which the Apollo landing made the most important contributions. The answers to remaining questions entail a robotic revisiting of the lunar surface.

Morgan, Thomas H.↗