Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Morton, Daniel

Publications and source records attributed to Morton, Daniel.

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

The X-ray Focusing System at the Time-Resolved AMO Instrument

The emergence of X-ray Free Electron Lasers (XFELs) in recent years has opened up new fields of research, with the merging of short wavelengths and ultrafast timescales. As XFEL facilities including the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) have matured, there is renewed interest in pushing the performance boundaries of experimental endstations, as well as improving ease of operation for experiments. One of the major areas of improvement is that of X-ray micro- and nano-focusing. The focus quality is directly linked to the peak intensity at the interaction point with a sample, and is especially important for intensity-dependent (e.g. x-ray pump) studies and imaging efforts such as single particle imaging.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2020

Adaptive shape control of wavefront-preserving X-ray mirrors with active cooling and heating

This article describes the development and testing of a novel, water cooled, active optic mirror system (called “REAL: Resistive Element Adjustable Length”) that combines cooling with applied auxiliary heating, tailored to the spatial distribution of the thermal load generated by the incident beam. This technique is theoretically capable of sub-nanometer surface figure error control even at high power density. Tests conducted in an optical metrology laboratory and at synchrotron X-ray beamlines showed the ability to maintain the mirror profile to the level needed for the next generation storage rings and FEL mirrors.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2019

Collaborative development of diffraction-limited beamline optical systems at US DOE light sources

An ongoing collaboration among four US Department of Energy National Laboratories has demonstrated key technology prototypes and software modeling tools required for new high-coherent flux beamline optical systems. New free electron laser (FEL) and diffraction-limited storage ring (DLSR) light sources demand wavefront preservation from source to sample to achieve and maintain optimal performance. Fine wavefront control was achieved using a novel, roomtemperature cooled mirror system called REAL (resistive element adjustable length) that combines cooling with applied, spatially variable auxiliary heating. Single-grating shearing interferometry (also called Talbot interferometry) and Hartmann wavefront sensors were developed and used for optical characterization and alignment on several beamlines, across a range of photon energies. Demonstrations of non-invasive hard x-ray wavefront sensing were performed using a thin diamond single-crystal as a beamsplitter.

Goldberg, Kenneth A.↗
DOE OSTI2018

Advances in X-ray optics: From metrology characterization to wavefront sensing-based optimization of active optics

Experiments using high brightness X-rays are on the forefront of science due to the vast variety of knowledge they can provide. New Synchrotron Radiation (SR) and Free Electron Laser (FEL) light sources provide unique tools for advanced studies using X-rays. Top-level scientists from around the world are attracted to these beamlines to perform unprecedented experiments. High brightness, low emittance light sources allow beamline scientists the possibility to dream up cutting-edge experimental stations. X-ray optics play a key role in bringing the beam from the source to the experimental stations. This paper explores the recent developments in X-ray optics. It touches on simulations, diagnostics, metrology and adaptive optics, giving an overview of the role X-ray optics have played in the recent past. It will also touch on future developments for one of the most active field in the X-ray science.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2016

Sci-Thur PM – Brachytherapy 03: Identifying the impact of seroma visualization on permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy

Purpose: Uncertainties in target identification can reduce treatment accuracy in permanent breast seed implant (PBSI) brachytherapy. This study evaluates the relationship between seroma visualization and seed placement accuracy. Methods: Spatially co-registered CT and 3D ultrasound (US) images were acquired for 10 patients receiving PBSI. Seromas were retrospectively contoured independently by 3 radiation oncologists on both CT and US and respective consensus volumes were defined, CTV{sub CT} and CTV{sub US}. The seroma clarity and inter-user conformity index (CI), as well as inter-modality CI, volume, and positional differences were evaluated. Correlations with seed placement accuracy were then assessed. CTVs were expanded by 1.25cm to create PTV{sub CT} and PTV{sub US} and evaluate the conformity with PTV{sub Clinical} (CTV{sub Clinical}+1.25cm) used in treatment planning. The change in PTV coincidence by expanding PTV{sub Clinical} by 0.25cm was determined. Results: CTV{sub US} were a mean 68 ± 12% smaller than CTV{sub CT} and generally had improved clarity and inter-user conformity. No correlations between seed displacement and CTV{sub US}-CTV{sub CT} positional difference or CI were observed. Greater seed displacements were associated with larger CTV{sub US}-CTV{sub CT} volume differences (r=−0.65) and inter-user CT CI (r=−0.74). A median (range) 88% (71–99%) of PTV{sub CT} and 83% (69–100%) of PTV{sub US} were contained within PTV{sub Clinical}. Expanding treatment margins to 1.5cm increased coincidence to 98% (86–100%) and 94% (82–100%), respectively. Conclusions: Differences in seroma visualization impacts seed displacement in PBSI. Reducing dependence on CT by incorporating 3DUS into target identification, or expanding CT-based treatment margins to 1.5cm may reduce or mitigate uncertainties related to seroma visualization.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2016

Seed Placement in Permanent Breast Seed Implant Brachytherapy: Are Concerns Over Accuracy Valid?

Purpose: To evaluate seed placement accuracy in permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy (PBSI), to identify any systematic errors and evaluate their effect on dosimetry. Methods and Materials: Treatment plans and postimplant computed tomography scans for 20 PBSI patients were spatially registered and used to evaluate differences between planned and implanted seed positions, termed seed displacements. For each patient, the mean total and directional seed displacements were determined in both standard room coordinates and in needle coordinates relative to needle insertion angle. Seeds were labeled according to their proximity to the anatomy within the breast, to evaluate the influence of anatomic regions on seed placement. Dosimetry within an evaluative target volume (seroma + 5 mm), skin, breast, and ribs was evaluated to determine the impact of seed placement on the treatment. Results: The overall mean (±SD) difference between implanted and planned positions was 9 ± 5 mm for the aggregate seed population. No significant systematic directional displacements were observed for this whole population. However, for individual patients, systematic displacements were observed, implying that intrapatient offsets occur during the procedure. Mean displacements for seeds in the different anatomic areas were not found to be significantly different from the mean for the entire seed population. However, small directional trends were observed within the anatomy, potentially indicating some bias in the delivery. Despite observed differences between the planned and implanted seed positions, the median (range) V{sub 90} for the 20 patients was 97% (66%-100%), and acceptable dosimetry was achieved for critical structures. Conclusions: No significant trends or systematic errors were observed in the placement of seeds in PBSI, including seeds implanted directly into the seroma. Recorded seed displacements may be related to intrapatient setup adjustments. Despite observed seed displacements, acceptable postimplant dosimetry was achieved.

62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE↗