Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Muehlbauer, J. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Muehlbauer, J. C..

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1981

Turboprop cargo aircraft systems study

The effects of using advanced turboprop propulsion systems to reduce the fuel consumption and direct operating costs of cargo aircraft were studied, and the impact of these systems on aircraft noise and noise prints around a terminal area was determined. Parametric variations of aircraft and propeller characteristics were investigated to determine their effects on noiseprint areas, fuel consumption, and direct operating costs. From these results, three aircraft designs were selected and subjected to design refinements and sensitivity analyses. Three competitive turbofan aircraft were also defined from parametric studies to provide a basis for comparing the two types of propulsion.

Muehlbauer, J. C.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Advanced turboprop cargo aircraft systems study

Parametric studies were conducted to define the effects of advanced propeller (propfan) characteristics on aircraft direct operating costs, fuel consumption, and noiseprints. Selected propfan aircraft realized 21-percent fuel savings and 15-percent lower DOCs relative to advanced turbofan aircraft. While both the propfan and turbofan aircraft satisfied current federal noise regulations, the propfan aircraft had smaller noiseprints at 90-EPNdB noise levels but larger noiseprints at lower noise levels. Several techniques for reducing the propfan aircraft noiseprints were explored; some of these contribute substantial reductions in noiseprint areas. Also, a propfan aircraft for the C-X role was studied.

Muehlbauer, J. C.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Turboprop Cargo Aircraft Systems study, phase 1

The effects of advanced propellers (propfan) on aircraft direct operating costs, fuel consumption, and noiseprints were determined. A comparison of three aircraft selected from the results with competitive turbofan aircraft shows that advanced turboprop aircraft offer these potential benefits, relative to advanced turbofan aircraft: 21 percent fuel saving, 26 percent higher fuel efficiency, 15 percent lower DOCs, and 25 percent shorter field lengths. Fuel consumption for the turboprop is nearly 40 percent less than for current commercial turbofan aircraft. Aircraft with both types of propulsion satisfy current federal noise regulations. Advanced turboprop aircraft have smaller noiseprints at 90 EPNdB than advanced turbofan aircraft, but large noiseprints at 70 and 80 EPNdB levels, which are usually suggested as quietness goals. Accelerated development of advanced turboprops is strongly recommended to permit early attainment of the potential fuel saving. Several areas of work are identified which may produce quieter turboprop aircraft.

Muehlbauer, J. C.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Technical and Economic Assessment of Span-Distributed Loading Cargo Aircraft Concepts

A 700,000 kg (1,540,000-lb) aircraft with a cruise Mach number of 0.75 was found to be optimum for the specified mission parameters of a 272 155-kg (600,000-lb) payload, a 5560-km (3000-n.mi.) range, and an annual productivity of 113 billion revenue-ton km (67 billion revenue-ton n. mi.). The optimum 1990 technology level spanloader aircraft exhibited the minimum 15-year life-cycle costs, direct operating costs, and fuel consumption of all candidate versions. Parametric variations of wing sweep angle, thickness ratio, rows of cargo, and cargo density were investigated. The optimum aircraft had two parallel rows of 2.44 x 2.44-m (8 x 8-ft) containerized cargo with a density of 160 kg/cu m (10 lb/ft 3) carried throughout the entire 101-m (331-ft) span of the constant chord, 22-percent thick, supercritical wing. Additional containers or outsized equipment were carried in the 24.4-m (80-ft) long fuselage compartment preceding the wing. Six 284,000-N (64,000-lb) thrust engines were mounted beneath the 0.7-rad (40-deg) swept wing. Flight control was provided by a 36.6-m (120-ft) span canard surface mounted atop the forward fuselage, by rudders on the wingtip verticals and by outboard wing flaperons.

Johnston, W. M.↗