Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Muhlstein, L., Jr.

Publications and source records attributed to Muhlstein, L., Jr..

Fluid dynamic research at NASA-Ames Research Center related to transonic wind tunnel design and testing techniques

Fluid dynamic research with the objective of developing new and improved technology in both test facility concepts and test techniques is being reported. A summary of efforts and results thus far obtained in four areas is presented. The four area are: (1) the use of heavy gases to obtain high Reynolds numbers at transonic speeds: (2) high Reynolds number tests of the C-141A wing configuration; (3) performance and flow quality of the pilot injector driven wind tunnel; and (4) integration time required to extract accurate static and dynamic data from tests in transonic wind tunnels. Some of the principal conclusions relative to each of the four areas are: (1) Initial attempts to apply analytical corrections to test results using gases with gamma other than 1.4 to simulate conditions in air show promise but need significant improvement; (2) for the C-141A configuration, no Reynolds number less than the full scale flight value provides an accurate simulation of the full scale flow; (3) high ratios of tunnel mass flow rate to injection mass flow rate and high flow quality can be obtained in an injector driven transonic wind tunnel; and (4) integration times of 0.5 to 1.0 sec may be required for static force and pressure tests, respectively, at some transonic test conditions in order to obtain the required data accuracy.

Muhlstein, L., Jr.↗

Integration time required to extract accurate static and dynamic data from transonic wind-tunnel tests

Because the forces and pressures on wind-tunnel models tested at transonic speeds are not steady, even for 'static' aerodynamic tests, integration time is required to obtain data of acceptable accuracy. The integration time required for both static and dynamic tests is evaluated analytically and confirmed by experimental measurements. It is shown that, for static and dynamic tests, the accuracy obtained is a function of integration time, frequency content of the signal, and the ratio of the dynamic amplitude to the full signal of interest. In addition, for the dynamic case, the frequency band width used in analysis is important. Results of this study indicate that, for typical data accuracy desired from models in a large transonic wind tunnel (11- by 11-ft), up to the following integration times are required: static force and moment tests, 0.5 sec; static pressure tests, 0.1 sec; flutter tests, 30 to 60 sec; and random-dynamic tests, 10 sec.

Muhlstein, L., Jr.↗

Experimental evaluation of an injector system for powering a high Reynolds number transonic wind tunnel

The problems of powering a large, high-Reynolds number transonic wind tunnel are briefly reviewed, and the advantages of an injector drive system are presented. This paper is based on the results of an experimental investigation of a series of injector configurations and test variables using a pilot wind tunnel with a 6-in.-diameter test section. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the efficiency and flow quality of an injector driven wind tunnel and develop configurations that will reduce the initial cost of a wind tunnel without seriously reducing efficiency and flow quality. The results indicate that high efficiencies can be obtained and that injector drive does not compromise flow quality in a transonic wind tunnel.

Muhlstein, L., Jr.↗

Assessment of potential buffet problems on the space shuttle vehicle

Buffet of the space shuttle launch and reentry configuration is an area requiring continued evaluation to produce a safe reliable vehicle of minimum weight. Buffet forces result from flow separation and therefore can not be predicted accurately. Buffet loads are highly sensitive to configuration, angle of attack, and Mach number and can be reliably determined only by wind tunnel tests of elastically scaled models.

Muhlstein, L., Jr.↗

Experimental evaluation of the aerodynamic damping of skin panels at low supersonic Mach numbers.

The aerodynamic damping of the first three vibration modes of a rectangular panel exposed to an attached turbulent boundary layer has been measured over the Mach number range of 1.10 to 1.40. Data showing that aerodynamic damping is a strong function of Mach number, dynamic pressure, mode shape, and boundary layer thickness are presented. At low supersonic Mach numbers, aerodynamic damping was found to be 20 to 100 times as large as common values of structural damping. Means of calculating aerodynamic damping, including effects of the boundary layer profile, are discussed. Calculated aerodynamic damping is compared with experimental data.

Muhlstein, L., Jr.↗