Engineering topics

Mujeeb R. Malik

Publications and source records attributed to Mujeeb R. Malik.

5 records

NASA NTRS2024

Direct Numerical Simulation of Smooth-Body Flow Separation Around a Ramp

Spanwise-periodic computation of a turbulent flow past a two-dimensional smooth ramp geometry is performed in the form of a direct numerical simulation. The Reynolds number based on the ramp height is about 147,000. A straight section that precedes the smooth ramp allows the incoming turbulent boundary layer to grow under a weak favorable pressure gradient. The boundary layer introduced at the domain inlet has a momentum-thickness based Reynolds number of 2000. The turbulent boundary layer nearing the ramp first interacts with a relatively stronger favorable pressure gradient, followed by a strong adverse pressure gradient. Consequently, the boundary layer experiences a modest acceleration before decelerating and separating. Analysis of the data over this region hints at the formation of an internal layer beneath the accelerated boundary layer. The analysis also reveals that this internal layer forms the origin of the free shear layer that emerges in the deceleration region and separates. The streamwise extent of the separated region is comparable to the ramp length, while the viscous layer thickness near reattachment is about the same as the ramp height; hence, the boundary layer undergoing separation and subsequent reattachment in the present configuration experiences its thickness being amplified by about tenfold. The reattached flow continues to develop further under a diminishing pressure gradient in the recovery region in a similar fashion to a zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer.

Turbulence↗

NASA NTRS2023

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES),and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES)are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75,and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985).1The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model.The unsteady RANS simulations,only with the compressibility correction,predict the pre- and post-buffet characteristics,which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment.The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment

Transonic Buffet↗

NASA NTRS2022

A Dynamic Nonlinear Subgrid-Scale Model for Large-Eddy Simulation of Complex Turbulent Flows

We present a new dynamic nonlinear subgrid-scale (SGS) model for large-eddy simulations (LES) and apply it to compute a flow involving pressure gradients, surface curvature and separation, for which data from a direct numerical simulation are available for comparison. The model, inspired by the triple model idea of Bardina et al. (“Improved Turbulence Models Based on Large Eddy Simulation of Homogeneous, Incompressible, Turbulent Flows,” Report No. TF-19, Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 1983), includes a Galilean-invariant term called the modified Leonard stress tensor, and two nonlinear terms comprised of the products of the strain-rate and rotation-rate tensors for an improved representation of the subgrid-scale dissipation, backscatter and anisotropy effects. The model does not employ any ad hoc averaging or clipping procedures, and does not require the specification of a characteristic length scale; hence, it naturally avoids the ambiguities associated with defining a proper length scale for anisotropic grids. Results from the wall-resolved LES of flow past a Gaussian bump using the new model demonstrate improved prediction of skin-friction, flow separation, mean flow profiles and turbulent quantities when compared to implicit LES as well as explicit LES using the Vreman SGS model on the same grid.

Turbulence↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall-modeled LES of Flow Over a Gaussian Bump

We perform wall-modeled large eddy simulations (WMLES) of turbulent flow over a Gaussian-shaped bump geometry, to assess its performance in the acceleration and separation regions of the flow. An unstructured finite-volume solver is used along with an equilibrium wall model. The Mach number of the oncoming flow selected for the simulation is 0.176, and two Reynolds numbers (Re) are simulated that are about 10000 and 36000 based on boundary layer thickness upstream of the bump. Spanwise periodic results for the lower Re case are compared with the available DNS data, while the full three-dimensional simulation results for the higher Re case are compared to available experimental data. Sensitivity of WMLES results are assessed for a number of factors including grid resolution, wall model exchange location, type of wall model, and unstructured grid topology. The WMLES results for the lower Re case agree well with available DNS data in terms of the wall pressure variation, velocity and turbulent stress profile comparisons. The skin-friction predictions show a reduced tendency to separate. This appears to be accentuated for the higher Re case, for the medium resolution grid used in this study, where WMLES does not predict any flow separation in the mean, which is in contrast to the large separation bubble observed in the experiments.

turbulence↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75, and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10 million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985). The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model. The unsteady RANS simulations, only with the compressibility correction, predict the pre- and post- buffet characteristics, which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment. The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment.

Transonic Buffet↗