Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

N Ulbrich

Publications and source records attributed to N Ulbrich.

Wall Interference Correction System of the NASA Ames 11-ft Transonic Wind Tunnel

The document for review is a chapter for a new AGARD document on wind tunnel wall interference. The chapter describes NASA's current approach to wind tunnel wall interference assessment by using the implementation of the wall interference correction system of the NASA Ames 11-ft Transonic Wind Tunnel as an example.

wind tunnel wall interference↗

A Universal Algorithm for the Detection of Bi-directional Gage Output Characteristics

A universal algorithm was developed that may be used to assess the bi-directional characteristics of the gage outputs of a wind tunnel strain-gage balance. The algorithm assumes that balance loads and gage outputs are described in the design format of the balance. It can also be applied to balance calibration data that is processed by using either the Iterative Method or the Non-Iterative Method. The algorithm uses an estimate of the bi-directional part of a gage output at load capacity as input. In addition, the statistical significance of the principle absolute value term in the regression model of either the gage output or the related primary load component is determined. A gage output is assumed to be bi-directional if two conditions are fulfilled: the bi-directional part of the output at load capacity exceeds 0.5 percent of the maximum output at load capacity; the p-value of the principle absolute value term of the regression model of the balance data is less than the threshold of 0.001. Data from the calibration of two six-component force balances and one five-component semi-span balance are used to illustrate the application of the universal detection algorithm.

wind tunnel test↗

An Improved Weighted Least Squares Algorithm for the Analysis of Strain-Gage Balance Calibration Data

An improved version of an algorithm is presented that uses a weighted least squares fit of balance calibration data for the generation of the balance load prediction equations. The weighted least squares fit assigns a weighting factor between zero and one to each calibration data point that depends on a simple count of the number of intentionally loaded balance gages. The greater the number of the loaded gages is, the smaller a data point's weighting factor becomes. This strategy has two advantages. First, single-component loads become more influential during the regression analysis of the calibration data. In addition, the negative influence of load schedule asymmetries on the regression analysis results can more effectively be controlled. The original algorithm of 2017 was improved in 2020. Now, gage output differences relative to the natural zeros are exclusively used as input for the determination of the number of intentionally loaded gages. The improved weighted least squares fit can be applied with both the Non-Iterative Method and the Iterative Method that are used for the balance load prediction in the aerospace testing community. Machine calibration data of a force balance is used to illustrate benefits of the application of the improved weighted least squares fit of balance calibration data.

strain-gage balance↗

Evaluation of a Traditional Regression Model Term Selection Process for Balance Calibration Data Sets

Key elements of a traditional regression model term selection process for the analysis of wind tunnel strain-gage balance calibration data are discussed. The traditional process is sometimes applied when regression models of the gage outputs are needed and an analyst does not have access to a term selection algorithm. In principle, the traditional process identifies supported regression model terms of a gage output by combining an analyst's subject- matter knowledge with a visual examination of selected plots of the calibration loads. Twelve empirical rules are listed that may be used to select regression model terms. Data from the manual calibration of a force balance is used to illustrate the application of the traditional term selection process. The data example shows that the traditional process can become very complex. Its successful application highly depends on an analyst's experience and skills. Therefore, it is suggested to replace the traditional term selection process with an automated term selection algorithm. Then, objective metrics are systematically applied during the term selection that make the identification of the regression model more repeatable and less dependent on an analyst's personal skills.

strain-gage balance↗

Load Schedule Design Improvements for the Calibration of NASA's Semi-span Balances

Improvements of the load schedule design for the calibration of NASA's semi-span balances are discussed. These improvements became possible after a minor hardware change was made to Calspan's Large Load Rig. This change moves normal and axial force load points 12 inches closer to the balance moment center. Resulting data quality improvements are significant because Calspan's Large Load Rig cannot currently apply forces at the balance moment center of a semi-span balance. Now, the supported set of rolling and yawing moment arms is 28 inches, 38 inches, and 48 inches. Consequently, the new load schedule design better supports expected normal and axial force locations on semi-span models that are tested in the NASA Ames 11-ft Transonic Wind Tunnel. In addition, estimates of the primary sensitivities of the normal force, axial force, rolling moment, and yawing moment have become more accurate as the applied normal and axial forces have moved closer to the balance moment center. Fundamental moment arm range requirements and Calspan's hardware updates are discussed in detail. In addition, calibration analysis results of NASA's ARC30K semi-span balance are presented to illustrate benefits of the hardware changes.

wind tunnel test↗

Load Schedule Design Improvements for the Calibration of NASA's Semi-span Balances

Improvements of the load schedule design for the calibration of NASA's semi-span balances are discussed. These improvements became possible after a minor hardware change was made to Calspan's Large Load Rig. This change moves normal and axial force load points 12 inches closer to the balance moment center. Resulting data quality improvements are significant because Calspan's Large Load Rig cannot currently apply forces at the balance moment center of a semi-span balance. Now, the supported set of rolling and yawing moment arms is 28, 38, and 48 inches. Consequently, the new load schedule design better supports expected normal and axial force locations on semi-span models that are tested in the NASA Ames 11-ft Transonic Wind Tunnel. In addition, estimates of the primary sensitivities of the normal force, axial force, rolling moment, and yawing moment have become more accurate as the applied normal and axial forces have moved closer to the balance moment center. Fundamental moment arm range requirements and Calspan's hardware updates are discussed. In addition, calibration and check load analysis results of NASA's ARC30K semi-span balance are presented to illustrate benefits of the hardware changes.

wind tunnel test↗

Comparison of Two Load Prediction Methods for Strain-Gage Balances

Data from a high-capacity semi-span balance is used to perform a detailed comparison of the load prediction accuracy of two strain-gage balance load prediction methods. Both methods independently obtain their load prediction equations from multivariate least squares fits of balance calibration data. The first method is called Non-Iterative Method. This approach directly uses regression models of the individual load components of a balance for the load prediction. The second method is called Iterative Method. This alternate approach uses a load iteration equation for the load prediction that is constructed from the regression models of the gage outputs of the balance. Basic characteristics of the two methods are reviewed. Afterwards, both methods are applied to calibration and check load data of the chosen balance. Finally, selected analysis results are compared. These comparisons confirmed that the load prediction accuracy of the two methods is the same for all practical purposes.

wind tunnel test↗

Graphical and Numerical Description of Strain-Gage Balance Interactions

A new approach for the graphical and numerical description of balance interactions is presented. The approach uses data from single-component loads as input. This choice has the two advantages. First, the number of applied loads is at the minimum needed for interactions to be observed. In addition, the loads used for the description of interactions can easily be repeated at different sites. Output differences relative to the outputs of the zero load point of a load series are used for the description of interactions. Similarly, load differences relative to the loads of the zero load point of a load series are used for the description of the loads. Interactions are plotted versus the load differences for each load component while omitting the outputs of the primary gage of the chosen load component. The resulting plots have a characteristic star pattern as interactions are zero at zero load. Numerical estimates of the slopes of the interactions can be reverse-engineered from the load prediction equations of a balance if calibration data is examined. The slopes are the off-diagonal coefficients of the inverse of the matrix that has the coefficients of the linear terms of the fitted loads if the Non-Iterative Method is used for the analysis. Similarly, the slopes are the off-diagonal coefficients of the inverse of the matrix that is the non-iterative part of the primary load iteration equation if the Iterative Method is used for the analysis. Data from the calibration of a force balance is processed to illustrate the proposed graphical and numerical description of interactions.

wind tunnel test↗

Improvements of the Load Schedule for the Machine Calibration of a Strain-Gage Balance

The load schedule for the calibration of a six-component force balance in a calibration machine was improved. Now, single-component loads are repeated in regular intervals during the calibration. This approach has several advantages. First, the number of single-component loads increases to about twenty-two percent of all loads and load combinations. Consequently, more accurate numerical estimates of the primary bridge sensitivities can be obtained if global regression is used for the analysis of the calibration data. In addition, single-component repeats make it possible to track the stability of the applied loads during the calibration process. Finally, interactions of single-component repeats can be compared with interactions that are observed during the application of manual loads to the balance. Machine calibration and manual data sets of two force balances are used to illustrate benefits of the new load schedule. It is shown in the examples how differences between the observed interactions of machine calibration and manual data can be quantified. The suggested improvements can also be implemented in the load schedule for the machine calibration of a moment or direct-read balance as long as single-component loads are included that are described in the design load format of the balance.

wind tunnel test↗

Features for a Modern Strain-Gage Balance Data Analysis Software Tool

Required, recommended, and optional features are discussed that benefit preparation and evaluation of the load prediction equations in a strain-gage balance data analysis tool. First, milestones in the evolution of load prediction methods are reviewed so that suggested features can be put into a historical context. Afterwards, independent and dependent variable choices for the balance data analysis are discussed. Then, it is illustrated how three different metrics may be used for the identification of the root cause of an unwanted divergence of the load iterations that may be observed during an iterative load prediction. Finally, a list of features is provided to guide software development efforts.

wind tunnel test↗

New Approach for the Assessment of Interactions of a Strain-Gage Balance

A new approach was developed to assess interactions of a strain-gage balance. The approach compares interactions observed during a calibration of the balance with interactions observed during the application of check loads. The approach assumes that alignment errors of the calibration loads are negligible. In that case, interactions observed during the calibration can be used as a reference for the assessment of interactions of check loads. The new approach first fits interactions of a single-component load of the calibration data using simple regression models. Then, interactions of the check loads are predicted by using the check load values as inputs for the regression models of the interactions. In the next step, absolute values of differences between predicted and observed interactions of the check loads are computed. Afterwards, the largest differences are compared with empirical thresholds to assess how well the interactions of the check load data agree with the interactions of the calibration data. Recently obtained data sets of a six-component force balance are used to illustrate the application of the new approach. It is also demonstrated how knowledge of balance design characteristics can benefit the assessment of interactions.

wind tunnel test↗