Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Narayanswami, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Narayanswami, N..

Laser interferometer skin-friction measurements of crossing-shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions

Wall shear stress measurements beneath crossing-shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interactions have been made for three interactions of different strengths. The interactions are generated by two sharp fins at symetric angles of attack mounted on a flat plate. The shear stress measurements were made for fin angles of 7 and 11 deg at Mach 3 and 15 deg at Mach 3.85. The measurements were made using a laser interferometer skin-friction meter, a device that determines the wall shear by optically measuring the time rate of thinning of an oil film placed on the test model surface. Results of the measurements reveal high skin-friction coefficients in the vicinity of the fin/plate junction and the presence of quasi-two-dimensional flow separation on the interaction center line. Additionally, two Navier-Stokes computations, one using a Baldwin-Lomax turbulence model and one using a k-epsilon model, are compared with the experimental results for the Mach 3.85, 15-deg interaction case. Although the k-epsilon model did a reasonable job of predicting the overall trend in portions of the skin-friction distribution, neither computation fully captured the physics of the near-surface flow in this complex interaction.

Garrison, T. J.↗

Computation of crossing shock/turbulent boundary layer interaction at Mach 8.3

A three-dimensional (3D) hypersonic crossing shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction is examined numerically at Mach 8.3. The test geometry consists of a pair of opposing sharp fins of angle alpha = 15 deg, mounted on a flat plate. Two theoretical models are evaluated. The full (3D) Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations are solved using the Baldwin-Lomax and the Rodi (modified k-epsilon) turbulence models. Computed results for both cases show good agreement with experiment for flat plate surface pressure and for flowfield profiles of pitot pressure and yaw angle, indicating that the flowfield is primarily rotational and inviscid. Fair to poor agreement is obtained for surface heat transfer, indicating a need for more accurate turbulence models. The overall flowfield structure is similar to that observed in previous crossing shock interaction studies.

Narayanswami, N.↗

Numerical simulation of crossing/turbulent boundary layer interaction at Mach 8.3 comparison of zero and two-equation turbulence models

A 3D hypersonic crossing shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction is examined numerically. The test geometry consists of a pair of opposing sharp fins of angle alpha = 15 deg mounted on a flat plate. The freestream Mach number is 8.28. Two theoretical models are evaluated. The full 3D Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations are solved using the Baldwin-Lomax algebraic turbulent eddy viscosity model and the Rodi turbulence model. Computed results for both cases show good agreement with experiment for flat plate surface pressure and for pitot pressure and yaw angle profiles in the flowfield. General agreement is obtained for surface flow direction. Fair to poor agreement is obtained for surface heat transfer, indicating a need for more accurate turbulence models. The overall flowfield structure is similar to that observed in previous crossing shock interaction studies.

Narayanswami, N.↗

Crossing shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interactions

Three-dimensional interactions between crossing shock waves generated by symmetric sharp fins and a turbulent boundary layer on a flat plate are investigated experimentally and theoretically at Mach number 2.95 and freestream unit Reynolds number 1.96 x 10 to the 7th/ft. The incoming boundary layer has a thickness of 4 mm at the location of the fin leading edges. A comparison of experimental and computational results for two sets of fin angles (11 x 11 and 9 x 9 deg) shows general agreement with regard to surface pressure measurements and surface streamline patterns. The principal feature of the streamline structure is a collision of counterrotating vortical structures emanating from near the fin leading edges and meeting at the geometric centerline of the interaction.

Narayanswami, N.↗