Engineering topics

Nathan Jimenez

Publications and source records attributed to Nathan Jimenez.

9 records

NASA NTRS2026

Radiation-Conditioned Ti–hBN Coatings for Space Mechanisms: Bridging Tribology and Irradiation Effects from Laboratory to Low-Earth Orbit

The longevity of tribological components in extraterrestrial environments is challenged by abrasive regolith, extreme temperatures, and ionizing radiation. This study evaluates the performance of vacuum plasma sprayed (VPS) Ti-2vol.% hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) coatings applied to joint mechanisms such as rod and slot, ball and socket, and hinge assemblies, fabricated from Al6061 and Ti6Al4V for planetary structures. Coated and uncoated samples were tested under vacuum with lunar regolith simulant (JSC-1A), followed by environmental exposures including electron radiation and thermal cycling. Results show that coated samples consistently outperformed uncoated counterparts across all configurations. Wear depth in coated components was reduced by over 80%, as confirmed by 3D profilometry and surface imaging. SEM analysis revealed severe abrasion and localized plastic deformation in uncoated surfaces, while coated samples retained structural integrity due to synergy of hard protective phases formed during deposition and retained hBN providing solid lubrication in the sliding surface. Coated and exposed samples exhibited smoother actuation profiles and reduced friction, indicating a beneficial "conditioning" effect from environmental exposure. The coatings-maintained performance even on complex geometries with minimal delamination. These findings demonstrate the potential of VPS Ti-hBN coatings to extend the operational life of lunar mechanisms, bridging laboratory-scale tribology with flight-relevant mechanical applications.

tribology↗

NASA NTRS2024

Wear and Neutron Shielding Resilience of Titanium-Hexagonal Boron Nitride Coatings Against Extreme Lunar Radiation and Thermal Cycles

Ti6Al4V and Al6061 are aerospace alloys used in lunar structural components and rovers owing to their high specific strength. However, they deteriorate rapidly when subjected to demanding conditions of the lunar environment, such as extreme thermal cycles, solar particle radiation, and abrasive regolith. Cryo-milled powders were employed to deposit hBN-reinforced protective titanium coatings through plasma spray (atmospheric APS and vacuum-VPS) with 2 and 10 vol% of hBN on Ti6Al4V and Al6061 substrates. These coatings were evaluated for durability under extreme lunar-like conditions, including thermal cycling, electron radiation, and synergistic (electron radiation-thermal cycle) exposure. The coatings exhibited radiation-induced hardening, resulting in a substantial increase in their microhardness ~20–40% compared to virgin condition. Bright-field transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis reveals the presence of high dislocation densities, black dot defects, and dislocation clusters, providing evidence of the severe impact of synergistic environmental stresses. Ball-on-disk tribological tests were conducted in the presence of JSC-1 A lunar regolith simulant to evaluate the wear performance of coatings. Compared to conventional Ti6Al4V substrate, 50%, 90%, and 70% reductions in wear volume were observed in the Ti/2 vol% hBN coatings in thermal-only, radiation-only, and synergistic environments. Neutron shielding tests indicate that the synergistic coatings offer higher neutron shielding performance by up to 28% compared to virgin coatings, attributed to improved neutron capture by 10B isotopes. Upon a comprehensive assessment and ranking of multiple coatings under varying conditions, the VPS Ti/2 vol% hBN coating emerges as the top choice for protection against extreme radiation and thermal cycles for future lunar explorations.

Boron nitride↗

NASA NTRS2024

Evaluation of Cleaning Methods for Dust Mitigation of Lunar Docking and Hatch Seals

Low-leakage seals are an enabling technology for future lunar surface systems, and they must be kept clean to ensure that crews have sufficient breathable air for extended lunar surface missions. Previous testing on representative state-of-the-art seals showed that while seals can tolerate some level of lunar simulant dust contamination, dust can degrade seal performance to a point at which seal leak rates exceed maximum allowable values. The ability to clean simulant from seals had not been thoroughly studied, and the effectiveness and potential complications of using different cleaning methods for lunar seals were not well understood. To address this knowledge gap, researchers at the NASA Glenn Research Center executed a multiphase study to better understand and mitigate seal dust-exposure risks. The focus of this report is on the second phase of that study, in which tests were conducted to evaluate the viability of seal cleaning methods for use in the lunar environment. Multiple methods for cleaning seals contaminated with lunar simulant were assessed for cleaning effectiveness and viability for use in the lunar environment. Leak tests were performed on seals after they were cleaned to determine whether leak rates could be brought back to acceptable levels, and cleaned seals were examined to determine whether their surfaces had been damaged by the cleaning processes. This phase of the study also investigated changes in the seals’ adhesion forces as a result of contamination and cleaning.

Dust Mitigation↗

NASA NTRS2024

Dust Tolerance Characterization of Lunar Docking and Hatch Seals

Low-leakage seals are an enabling technology for future lunar surface systems, and they must be kept clean to ensure that crews have sufficient breathable air for extended lunar surface missions. Previous testing has shown that contamination and debris on seals can cause them to exhibit higher leak rates. However, seal performance in the presence of lunar dust has not been thoroughly characterized, and the size and concentration of dust particles that cause seal leak rates to become unacceptable have not been defined or well understood. To address this knowledge gap, researchers at the NASA Glenn Research Center have been executing a multiphase study to better understand and mitigate seal dust-exposure risks. The focus of this paper is on the first phase of that study, in which tests were conducted to develop a performance database for two representative state-of-the-art seal designs. Leak rates are presented for seals with varying levels of dust contamination, and breakthrough points are identified at which seal leak rates exceeded equivalent leak rate requirements. This phase of the study also investigated the effects of temperature on the seals’ ability to hold pressure when contaminated with dust.

Dust Mitigation↗

NASA NTRS2023

Tribological and Radiation Shielding Response of Novel Titanium-Boron Nitride Coatings for Lunar Structural Components

Aluminum (Al) and titanium (Ti) lightweight alloys play a crucial role in space systems due to their exceptional strength-to-weight ratio. However, their premature failure in the presence of lunar regolith and their lack of neutron shielding ability are significant challenges. To address these issues, we have developed air and vacuum plasma-sprayed hBN (hexagonal Boron Nitride) -reinforced titanium coatings with 2 and 10 vol% of hBN. Tribological studies conducted with JSC-1 A lunar regolith simulant revealed a 90 % reduction in wear volume for the Ti/2 vol% hBN coatings compared to conventional materials due to the synergistic action of harder secondary phases and solid lubrication effect of hBN. Additionally, a 27 % enhancement in radiation shielding is obtained based on the mass absorption coefficient (radiation absorbed per sample density and thickness) for VPS Ti/2 vol% hBN coatings.

Wear↗

NASA NTRS2022

Dusty Environment Classification and Testing: Dust Mitigation Slide Wipes & Tapes

During the Apollo missions many mechanisms, equipment, and surfaces were contaminated by lunar dust and often negatively affected. The methods used to clear these devices of dust proved ineffective, which led to premature failure in some cases. Systems being designed for upcoming missions to the Moon will need to address the performance degradation risk of dust contamination. Surfaces at risk include thermal control surfaces, solar cells, camera and sensor optics, seals, metal joints and tools, and space suit assemblies. To improve state of the art dust mitigation approaches, the dust mitigation team at NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) explored the effects imposed on substrates during cleaning activities in the presence of lunar dust. The Uniform Dust Deposition System (UDDS) was used to conduct a study of various cleaning techniques on different substrates. Test substrates and cleaning media were selected to represent a wide range of structural and functional materials. Substrates included orthofabric, thermal radiator coating, aluminum, quartz glass, silicone rubber, aluminized Mylar, and FEP. Cleaning materials included cloth wipes, tapes, a brush, and a pliable cleaner concept. Cleaning material / substrate pairs were rated on cleaning efficiency, substrate damage, cleaning material longevity, and ease of use. The best performing cleaning method varied based on application.

lunar simulant↗

NASA NTRS2022

Lunar Simulant Deposition Technique for Dust Tolerance Studies

A renewed interest in lunar exploration has spawned an array of development efforts for lunar surface assets. These systems depend on the reliable operation of mechanisms and components that may be susceptible to performance degradations or failure due to dust. The Uniform Dust Deposition System was developed at the NASA Glenn Research Center to provide repeatable, uniform, and automated deposition of simulants on surfaces of interest for dust mitigation testing. The system is capable of depositing simulants on test articles up to 60 cm in diameter and 15 cm high in a dry air environment with less than 1 percent relative humidity while keeping users safe from aerosolized dust. The automation of the system allows for high testing throughput while not sacrificing test quality and allows the user to reduce data in parallel. The additional development of a simulant preparation technique complements the repeatability of the deposition physics during testing. The system includes an imaging subsystem that leverages the power of machine learning to count simulant particles and measure their size, thereby allowing for accurate predictions of surface deposition densities (coefficient of determination R^(2) = 0.93) from images alone. The coverage of dust on a surface was shown to be uniform (coefficient of variation CV < 0.11), allowing developers to accurately evaluate the performance of their technology with a prescribed amount of lunar simulant, information that can be used to develop and refine models. The accuracy of the system is currently less than desired for a single deposition run, with a standard deviation (SD) ranging from 18 to 24 mg, or 0.839 to 1.184 mg/sq. cm , for a 5-cm-diameter area. However, the accuracy can be improved by performing multiple deposition runs to build dust to a desired level. Testing has shown that a SD of 0.2 to 0.6 mg, or 0.076 to 0.227 mg/sq. cm, can be achieved for a 5-cm-diameter area using this technique.

Stephen Gerdts↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Uniform Dust Deposition System for Dust Tolerance Studies

Future missions to the Moon will require mechanisms and materials to effectively and reliably operate in the presences of lunar regolith. One of the challenges of developing such technologies is terrestrial testing with lunar dust simulants. Dust has a stochastic nature of depositing and it can be difficult to accurately apply it to surfaces of interest. Deposition density, particles size distribution, and percent coverage are all factors that affect the quality of dust mitigation testing. Therefore, to enable such testing the dust mitigation and seals teams at NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) have developed a system that can uniformly and repeatably deposit lunar simulants on a range of surfaces. Testing of the Dust Deposition System (DDS) and an associatedsimulant preparation methodology have quantified the levels of uniformity and precision for this system. Furthermore, the deposition system has been paired with automated micrograph capturing and machine learning image analysis to correlate the images of dust on a surface to deposition density (in g/cm2). This correlation alleviates the need for tested samples to be accurately weighed with milligram precision and may be a useful tool for in-situ contamination evaluation on the Moon. This paper covers the design and validation testing for the DDS.

Stephen Gerdts↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Uniform Dust Deposition System for Dust Tolerance Studies

Future missions to the Moon will require mechanisms and materials to effectively and reliably operate in the presences of lunar regolith. One of the challenges of developing such technologies is terrestrial testing with lunar dust simulants. Dust has a stochastic nature of depositing and it can be difficult to accurately apply it to surfaces of interest. Deposition density, particles size distribution, and percent coverage are all factors that affect the quality of dust mitigation testing. Therefore, to enable such testing the dust mitigation and seals teams at NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) have developed a system that can uniformly and repeatably deposit lunar simulants on a range of surfaces. Testing of the Dust Deposition System (DDS) and an associated simulant preparation methodology have quantified the levels of uniformity and precision for this system. Furthermore, the deposition system has been paired with automated micrograph capturing and machine learning image analysis to correlate the images of dust on a surface to deposition density (in g/cm2). This correlation alleviates the need for tested samples to be accurately weighed with milligram precision and may be a useful tool for in-situ contamination evaluation on the Moon. This paper covers the design and validation testing for the DDS.

Dust↗