Engineering topics

Navar, M. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Navar, M. S..

4 records

NASA NTRS1992

Polar cloud and surface classification using AVHRR imagery - An intercomparison of methods

Six Advanced Very High-Resolution Radiometer local area coverage (AVHRR LAC) arctic scenes are classified into ten classes. Three different classifiers are examined: (1) the traditional stepwise discriminant analysis (SDA) method; (2) the feed-forward back-propagation (FFBP) neural network; and (3) the probabilistic neural network (PNN). More than 200 spectral and textural measures are computed. These are reduced to 20 features using sequential forward selection. Theoretical accuracy of the classifiers is determined using the bootstrap approach. Overall accuracy is 85.6 percent, 87.6 percent, and 87.0 percent for the SDA, FFBP, and PNN classifiers, respectively, with standard deviations of approximately 1 percent.

Welch, R. M.↗

NASA NTRS1990

Cumulus cloud field morphology and spatial patterns derived from high spatial resolution Landsat imagery

Using high-spatial-resolution Landsat MSS imagery, the cumulus cloud morphology, cloud nearest-neighbor distributions, and cloud clumping scales were investigated. It is shown that the cloud-size distribution can be represented by a mixture of two power laws; clouds of diameters less than 1 km have power-law slope range of 1.4-2.3, while larger clouds have slopes from 2.1 to 4.75. The break in power-law slope occurs at the cloud size that makes the largest contribution to cloud cover. Results suggest that larger clouds grow at the expense of smaller clouds. It was also found that the cloud inhomogeneities have significant impact on radiative fluxes.

Sengupta, S. K.↗

NASA NTRS1989

The effect of spatial resolution upon texture-based cloud field classifications

The loss of cloud-classification accuracy as a function of spatial resolution is assessed by investigating the variation of textural measures as a function of spatial resolution. Landsat MSS imagery is progressively averaged to produce degraded imagery of 1/8-km, 1/4-km, 1/2-km, and 1-km spatial resolution, and textural measures are computed from the Gray Level Difference Vector (GLDV) approach described by Chen et al. (1989). It is found that the classification accuracies obtained using the 1/8-km spatial resolution data are similar to those obtained using the full-resolution (1/16 km) texture measures, indicating that there is no advantage in using even higher spatial resolution 30-m Landsat Thematic Mapper and 10-m SPOT imagery for cloud classification.

Welch, R. M.↗

NASA NTRS1989

Performance of two texture-based classifiers of cloud fields using spatially averaged Landsat data

Using the gray-level difference vector approach, classification accuracies with 1/8-km spatial-resolution data are similar to those obtained using the full spatial-resolution features. Hence no advantage is to be gained in cloud classification accuracies by using even higher spatial resolutions obtained from Landsat TM or SPOT imagery. The optimum spatial resolution is 1/4 km. However, significant improvement in cloud-classification accuracy compared to that available from the 1-km resolution of AVHRR and GOES imagery is obtained using 1/2-km-resolution data. Cirrus-classification accuracy is especially compromised as spatial resolution is degraded. However, texture measures defined at the combination of pixel separations d = 1,4 improve classification accuracies by several percent, even for 1-km spatial-resolution data. Cirrus-classification accuracy is significantly improved by the use of multiple distance features.

Sengupta, S. K.↗