Nessyahu, Haim | Search NASA

NASA NTRS1991

The convergence rate of approximate solutions for nonlinear scalar conservation laws

The convergence rate is discussed of approximate solutions for the nonlinear scalar conservation law. The linear convergence theory is extended into a weak regime. The extension is based on the usual two ingredients of stability and consistency. On the one hand, the counterexamples show that one must strengthen the linearized L(sup 2)-stability requirement. It is assumed that the approximate solutions are Lip(sup +)-stable in the sense that they satisfy a one-sided Lipschitz condition, in agreement with Oleinik's E-condition for the entropy solution. On the other hand, the lack of smoothness requires to weaken the consistency requirement, which is measured in the Lip'-(semi)norm. It is proved for Lip(sup +)-stable approximate solutions, that their Lip'convergence rate to the entropy solution is of the same order as their Lip'-consistency. The Lip'-convergence rate is then converted into stronger L(sup p) convergence rate estimates.

Nessyahu, Haim↗

NASA NTRS1990

Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws

Many of the recently developed high resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws are based on upwind differencing. The building block for these schemes is the averaging of an appropriate Godunov solver; its time consuming part involves the field-by-field decomposition which is required in order to identify the direction of the wind. Instead, the use of the more robust Lax-Friedrichs (LxF) solver is proposed. The main advantage is simplicity: no Riemann problems are solved and hence field-by-field decompositions are avoided. The main disadvantage is the excessive numerical viscosity typical to the LxF solver. This is compensated for by using high-resolution MUSCL-type interpolants. Numerical experiments show that the quality of results obtained by such convenient central differencing is comparable with those of the upwind schemes.

Nessyahu, Haim↗

NASA NTRS1988

Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws

Many of the recently developed high resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws are based on upwind differencing. The building block for these schemes is the averaging of an appropriate Godunov solver; its time consuming part involves the field-by-field decomposition which is required in order to identify the direction of the wind. Instead, the use of the more robust Lax-Friedrichs (LxF) solver is proposed. The main advantage is simplicity: no Riemann problems are solved and hence field-by-field decompositions are avoided. The main disadvantage is the excessive numerical viscosity typical to the LxF solver. This is compensated for by using high-resolution MUSCL-type interpolants. Numerical experiments show that the quality of results obtained by such convenient central differencing is comparable with those of the upwind schemes.

Nessyahu, Haim↗