Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Nicholas J. Georgiadis

Publications and source records attributed to Nicholas J. Georgiadis.

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

Exploring the Langtry-Menter Transition Model for High Speed Applications Using FUN3D

A series of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations were performed using the FUN3D flow solver to explore the capabilities of the Langtry-Menter Shear-Stress Transport (LM-SST) transition model for predicting transition for aircraft inlet applications. Two geometries were simulated: a zeropressure-gradient flat plate and an axisymmetric cone exposed to hypersonic flow. In addition to the transition-sensitized LM-SST model investigations, simulations were run with the one-equation SpalartAllmaras (SA) and the two-equation Menter Shear-Stress Transport (SST-V) RANS models in fully turbulent mode to identify the natural RANS model transition behavior as a function of Mach number when executed in fully turbulent mode. The flat plate simulations showed that (1) the transition model was able to predict rapid transition at a freestream Mach number of 0.2, which is expected but (2) the predicted transition location moved downstream as the freestream Mach number was increased for the simulations that used the SST-V turbulence model. The latter is significant as it is usually assumed that one- and two-equation turbulence models will produce fully turbulent flow very near the boundary layer origin. The flat plate simulation freestream Mach number trend was confirmed with simulations using the Wind-US code, which also saw a similar trend when employing the SA turbulence model. For the axisymmetric cone simulations, the transition location was highly sensitive to the inflow turbulence levels. This is significant as the prediction of the transition location is crucial when trying to predict inlet performance, especially for hypersonic vehicle applications. It was also noted that the predicted transition location for the cone when using the SST-V turbulence model agreed well with the predicted transition location from the equivalent zero-pressure-gradient cold wall flat plate case.

Transition Model↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Multiphysics Computational Analysis of a Perforated Plate Cooling Flow

A multiphysics analysis of a film cooling flow was conducted using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver in conjunction with a conjugate heat transfer (CHT) solver. The film cooling problem consisted of a square nozzle producing a heated subsonic jet over a perforated plate with three sections of 45 cooling holes each. Results from the multiphysics analysis were compared to a CFD-only approach and experimental results. Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computations were employed first, with and without the CHT solver. The multiphysics approach provided much closer agreement with experimentally measured plate temperatures than the CFD-only approach. Comparisons of computed velocities and temperatures were also made with experimental data. Hybrid RANS-large eddy simulation calculations employing the Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) approach were also conducted within the multiphysics framework. The DDES approach was unable to resolve turbulent structures in the near wall regions. Hence, the RANS part of the DDES model was used in near wall regions, and produced surface temperatures along with velocity and temperature profiles close to the wall that were very similar to the RANS results. The DDES approach did resolve structures in the outer portion of the boundary layer especially near the end of the plate where the boundary layer was thicker. The key result was the improved surface temperatures produced by the multiphysics approach employing CHT over the fluid-only approach.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Summary of the 6th AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop Nozzle Test Case: Heated Supersonic Axisymmetric Jets

This paper summarizes findings from the sixth AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop (PAW) nozzle test case. The focus of the workshop participants was turbulent supersonic round jets with variation in jet Mach number and jet heating. Three nozzles were utilized with on-design jet Mach numbers of 1.36, 1.63, and 2.00. A heated jet for each of these three nozzles at on-design conditions, a temperature matched on-design condition at Mach 1.63, and an off-design heated condition for the Mach 1.63 nozzle were the five cases examined. Workshop participants utilized Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) based techniques. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solutions were compared with non-intrusive measurements of velocities and temperatures, including both mean values and turbulence statistics. In general, the RANS approaches were unable to capture the trend of reduced mixing as the jet Mach number increased. Incorporation of compressibility corrections improved the agreement with experimental measurements in terms of trends with varying jet Mach number, but also increased the jet potential core lengths to be in worse agreement with data. RANS methods were able to reasonably capture trends of jet heating. The LES-based approaches as a whole were able to capture the effects of compressibility more accurately. Effects of jet heating were captured well by LES. None of the LES approaches introduced disturbances from the wall boundary layers of the nozzle into the jet mixing layer, which would affect the jet flow physics modeling in the initial part of the jet shear layer, but would be very computationally demanding.

supersonic jet↗