Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Olive Stohlman

Publications and source records attributed to Olive Stohlman.

FY22 Precision Assembled Space Structure) PASS Annual Review Presentation

Space Technology Mission Directorate, Game Changing Development Program: Precision Assembled Space Structure (PASS) annual review slides. PASS is an autonomous robotic assembly project with an emphasis on high-precision, high-performance large assembled structures.

Autonomous assembly↗

In-Space Modular Assembly: An Approach for Reliable, Affordable, Precision Space Apertures

In-space assembly will revolutionize the creation, upgrade, and evolution of future space systems. In-space assembly represents an alternative deployment strategy that is not constrained by the requirement of using a single launch vehicle and enables a greater freedom of design for the initial emplacement of assets and their evolution over time. In-space assembly enables assets, such as observatories and science platforms, to become persistent, evolving over time like their terrestrial counterparts. Also, in-space assembly provides a direct path for utilization of in-space manufactured components designed exclusively for the operational environment. To highlight the advantages of an in-space assembly approach, the modular assembly of a 3 m to 4 m precision optical aperture based on thin meniscus technology coupled with structurally efficient TriTruss modules is presented. The 3 m to 4 m aperture stows compactly within two standard ride share slots (0.61 m by 0.71 m by 0.97 m). Placing instruments and the robotic system used for assembly in an adjacent ride share slot enables a capable observatory to be placed into service via modest ride share opportunities. Further, recent hardware assembly tests of similar modules and progress toward hardware tests to validate the overall architecture via diffraction limited testing will be summarized.

Design↗

In-Space Modular Assembly: An Approach for Reliable, Affordable, Precision Space Apertures

In-space assembly will revolutionize the creation, upgrade, and evolution of future space systems. In-space assembly represents an alternative deployment strategy that is not constrained by the requirement of using a single launch vehicle and enables a greater freedom of design for the initial emplacement of assets and their evolution over time. In-space assembly enables assets, such as observatories and science platforms, to become persistent, evolving over time like their terrestrial counterparts. Also, in-space assembly provides a direct path for utilization of in-space manufactured components designed exclusively for the operational environment. To highlight the advantages of an in-space assembly approach, the modular assembly of a 3 m to 4 m precision optical aperture based on thin meniscus technology coupled with structurally efficient TriTruss modules is presented. The 3 m to 4 m aperture stows compactly within two standard ride share slots (0.61 m by 0.71 m by 0.97 m). Placing instruments and the robotic system used for assembly in an adjacent ride share slot enables a capable observatory to be placed into service via modest ride share opportunities. Further, recent hardware assembly tests of similar modules and progress toward hardware tests to validate the overall architecture via diffraction limited testing will be summarized.

Design↗

Advanced Composite Solar Sail System (ACS3): Mechanisms and Lessons Learned from a CubeSat Solar Sail Deployer

This is an overview of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Advanced Composite Solar Sail System (ACS3) technology demonstration project mechanisms, their development, the testing they underwent, as well as the lessons learned in those activities. This overview includes an overall description of the primary deployment mechanisms and ground support equipment (GSE) needed for packaging the solar sail system.

Mechanisms↗

Structural Analysis, Modeling, and Testing of Multi-nut Joint for TriTruss Structure

The Multi-nut joint, developed at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC), was designed to assemble TriTruss modules for a doubly curved 65.6-feet telescope support structure. Axial and bending tests for a multi-nut joint in the TriTruss structure were conducted to characterize the structural performance of the multi-nut joint and to obtain the installation torque value of the attachment fastener. This paper describes the summary of the axial and bending tests of the multi-nut joint, along with the test results. The equivalent axial stiffness (EA) and equivalent bending stiffness (EI) of the multi-nut joint were characterized based on these test results and are presented in this report. Additionally, finite element models (FEMs) of the axial and bending test specimens were developed, and the predicted axial and bending responses of the multi-nut joint were compared with the test results. Test-analysis comparison results show that the predicted axial load-displacement response of the test specimen was within 5 percent of the test results, while the predicted load-bending response of the test specimen exhibited a consistent trend with the test data.

TriTruss↗

Structural Analysis, Modeling, and Testing of Multi-nut Joint for TriTruss Structure

The Multi-nut joint, developed at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC), was designed to assemble TriTruss modules for a doubly curved 65.6-feet telescope support structure. Axial and bending tests for a multi-nut joint in the TriTruss structure were conducted to characterize the structural performance of the multi-nut joint and to obtain the installation torque value of the attachment fastener. This paper describes the summary of the axial and bending tests of the multi-nut joint, along with the test results. The equivalent axial stiffness (EA) and equivalent bending stiffness (EI) of the multi-nut joint were characterized based on these test results and are presented in this report. Additionally, finite element models (FEMs) of the axial and bending test specimens were developed, and the predicted axial and bending responses of the multi-nut joint were compared with the test results. Test-analysis comparison results show that the predicted axial load-displacement response of the test specimen was within 5 percent of the test results, while the predicted load-bending response of the test specimen exhibited a consistent trend with the test data.

Structural analysis↗