Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

P. M. Bremner

Publications and source records attributed to P. M. Bremner.

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Kinematic Navigation and Cartography Knapsack (KNaCK) LiDAR System: Overview and Applications.

Improved terrain characterization and navigation sensors and methods are needed to enhance crew safety, ISRU return, and scientific understanding of future landing sites. Specific to the Artemis Program and sustained exploration at the lunar South Pole, extreme low-angle solar illumination conditions pose significant challenges to existing photogrammetry-based robotic navigation. Additionally, a major challenge for navigation on the Moon and other planetary surfaces is the lack of Global Positioning and Navigation Systems (GPS or GNSS). Thus, there is a need for an alternative to image-based navigation that allow for precise and accurate mapping in GPS-denied environments on any planetary body. Here, we describe the Kinematic Navigation and Cartography Knapsack (KNaCK) LiDAR system; a backpack-mounted, mobile navigation and terrain mapping system that uses a velocity-sensing coherent light detection and ranging (LiDAR) system based on a frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) technique, contains minimal moving parts, and employs sophisticated positioning algorithms. During a traverse, this instrument emits light pulses to continually scan a scene to build a three-dimensional point cloud representation of topography. A measure of the Doppler-velocity at each of millions of range points sampled per second allows for a 6 degree of freedom (6- DoF) estimate of the sensor’s position and the development of novel position-from-velocity mapping and positioning algorithms for loop-closure in GPS denied environments. Included with paper is the video presentation for the Figure 2: FMCW-LiDAR sensor on Kinematic Navigation and Cartography Knapsack (KNaCK) (Aeva Aeries 1)

M. Zanetti↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Future Lunar Geophysical Mission Opportunities Including the Lunar Geophysical Network and CLPS

In the next few years, several opportunities are underway to take new geophysical observations of the Moon including geodetic and seismic. NASA’s novel Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program seeks to acquire delivery services from 14 US companies. Nine funded task orders have been selected with payloads from multiple disciplines. Here we review the upcoming geophysical CLPS payloads and their measurement objectives then we provide a review of the Lunar Geophysical Network mission in development for New Frontiers 5. The Lunar Geophysical Network (LGN) mission is proposed to land on the Moon in the early 2030’s and deploy packages at four locations to enable continuous geophysical measurements for a minimum of 6 and a goal of 10 years. Returning to the lunar surface with a long-lived geophysical network is a key next step to advance lunar and planetary science. LGN will greatly expand our primarily Apollo-based knowledge of the deep lunar interior by identifying and characterizing mantle melt layers, as well as core size and state. To meet the mission objectives, the instrument suite provides complementary seismic, geodetic, heat flow, and electromagnetic (EM) observations. We discuss the network landing site requirements and provide example sites that meet these requirements. Landing sites include the P-5 region within the Procellarum KREEP Terrane (PKT; (lat:15˚; lon:-35˚), Schickard basin (lat:-44.3˚; lon:-55.1˚), Crisium basin (lat:18.5˚; lon:61.8˚), and the farside Korolev basin (lat:-2.4˚; lon:-159.3˚) (Figure 1). Network optimization considers the best locations to observe seismic core phases, e.g., ScS and PKP. Ray path density and proximity to young fault scarps are also analyzed to provide increased opportunities for seismic observations. Geodetic constraints from laser ranging require the LGN to have at least three nearside stations at maximum limb distances. Heat flow and EM measurements should be obtained away from terrane boundaries and from magnetic anomalies at locations representative of global trends. In our recent paper, an in-depth case study is provided for Mare Crisium. We also discuss the consequences for scientific return of less-than-optimal locations or number of stations.

Moons↗