Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Panaitescu, Alin-Daniel

Publications and source records attributed to Panaitescu, Alin-Daniel.

Properties of the Prompt Optical Counterpart Arising from the Cooling of Electrons in Gamma-Ray Bursts

This work extends a contemporaneous effort to study the properties of the lower-energy counterpart synchrotron emission produced by the cooling of relativistic gamma-ray burst (GRB) electrons through radiation (synchrotron and self-Compton) emission and adiabatic losses. We derive the major characteristics (pulse duration, lag time after burst, and brightness relative to the burst) of the prompt optical counterpart (POC) occurring during or after the GRB. Depending on the magnetic field lifetime, duration of electron injection, and electron transit time Δt o from hard X-ray (GRB) to optical-emitting energies, a POC may appear during the GRB pulse (of duration δt γ ) or after (delayed OC). The signature of counterparts arising from the cooling of GRB electrons is that POC pulses (Δto < δtγ) last as long as the corresponding GRB pulse (δt o ≃ δt γ ), while delayed OC pulses (Δt o > δt γ ) last as long as the transit time (δt o ≃ Δt o ). If OC variability can be measured, then another signature for this OC mechanism is that the GRB variability is passed on to POCs but not to delayed OCs. Within the GRB electron cooling model for counterparts, POCs should be on average dimmer than delayed ones (consistent with the data), and harder GRB low-energy slopes β LE should be associated more often with the dimmer POCs. The latter sets an observational bias against detecting POCs from (the cooling of electrons in) GRBs with a hard slope β LE , making it more likely that the detected POCs of such bursts arise from another mechanism.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

The Synchrotron Low-energy Spectrum Arising from the Cooling of Electrons in Gamma-Ray Bursts

This work is a continuation of a previous effort (Panaitescu) to study the cooling of relativistic electrons through radiation (synchrotron and self-Compton) emission and adiabatic losses, with application to the spectra and light curves of the synchrotron gamma-ray burst (GRB) produced by such cooling electrons. Here, we derive the low-energy slope β LE of a GRB pulse-integrated spectrum and quantify the implications of the measured distribution of β LE . Radiative processes that produce soft integrated spectra can accommodate the harder slopes measured by CGRO/BATSE and Fermi/GBM only if the magnetic field lifetime t B is shorter than the time during which the typical GRB electrons cool to radiate below 1–10 keV, which is less than (at most) 10 radiative cooling timescales t rad of the typical GRB electron. In this case, there is a one-to-one correspondence between t B and β LE . To account for low-energy slopes β LE > -3/4, the adiabatic electron-cooling requires a similar restriction on t B . In this case, the diversity of slopes arises mostly from how the electron-injection rate varies with time (temporal power-law injection rates yield power-law low-energy GRB spectra) and not from the magnetic field timescale.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗

X-Ray Afterglows from the Gamma-Ray Burst “Large-angle” Emission

In this work, we derive basic analytical results for the timing and decay of the gamma-ray burst (GRB) counterpart and delayed afterglow light curves for a brief emission episode from a relativistic surface endowed with angular structure, consisting of a uniform core of size ${\theta }_{c}$ (Lorentz factor ${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{c}$ and surface emissivity ${i}_{\nu ^{\prime} }^{{\prime} }$ are angle independent) and an axially symmetric power-law envelope (${\rm{\Gamma }}\sim {\theta }^{-g}$). In this "large-angle emission" model, radiation produced during the prompt emission phase (GRB) at angles $\theta \gt {\theta }_{c}$ arrives at the observer well after the burst (delayed emission). The dynamical time range of the very fast decaying GRB "tail" and of the flat afterglow "plateau" and the morphology of the GRB counterpart/afterglow are all determined by two parameters: the core's parameter ${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{c}{\theta }_{c}$ and the envelope's Lorentz factor index g, leading to three types of light curves that display three post-GRB phases (type 1: tail, plateau/slow decay, post-plateau/normal decay), two post-GRB phases (type 2: tail and fast decay), or just one (type 3: normal decay). We show how X-ray light-curve features can be used to determine core and envelope dynamical and spectral parameters. Testing of the large-angle emission model is done using the Swift/XRT X-ray emission of two afterglows of type 1 (GRB 060607A, GRB 061121), one of type 2 (GRB 061110A), and one of type 3 (GRB 061007). We find that the X-ray afterglows with plateaus require an envelope Lorentz factor ${\rm{\Gamma }}\sim {\theta }^{-2}$ and a comoving-frame emissivity ${i}_{\nu ^{\prime} }^{{\prime} }\sim {\theta }^{2}$; thus, for a typical afterglow spectrum ${F}_{\nu }\sim {\nu }^{-1}$, the lab-frame energy release is uniform over the emitting surface.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗