Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Paris, Mark W..
Hale & Paris (T-2) have evaluated the 15 N system to provide nuclear cross section and covariance information for nuclear data uncertainty quantification. This memo gives a brief discussion of the R-matrix method used to generate this nuclear scattering and reaction data in the ENDF-6 format.
Neutron Scattering Defines Neutron Transport. Elastic (n,n) and inelastic (n,n'γ) reactions dictate the neutronic energy flow. Each scattering reaction changes neutron direction $\vartheta$ and energy E. Scattering cross sections and angular distributions are essential for neutron transport. Uncertainties on scattering evaluations and measurements dominate total uncertainties. New, high-precision neutron scattering measurements and evaluations are needed from light elements to actinides
Motivation: Recent theoretical modeling at LANL has demonstrated that the ignition criteria is a strong function of the temperature of the DT ice that surrounds the hot spot [Daughton et al. PoP 2023]. Alpha heating of the DT shell can raise the ignition threshold. Critical to modeling the alpha-particle deposition in the shell is understanding charged particle stopping in warm dense matter.
The importance of studying the 16 O (𝑛,𝛼) reaction is motivated by multiple nuclear applications which rely on an accurate nuclear reaction data library for oxygen. Discrepancies between past experimental data on the 16 O (𝑛,𝛼) 13 C reaction and its time-reverse 13 C (𝛼,𝑛) 16 O reaction have led to various different nuclear data evaluations. Here, we have measured 16 O (𝑛,𝛼) reaction cross sections using the LENZ instrument with the unmoderated white neutron source at LANSCE. Results from 2016/2017 data are discussed and used to benchmark the mcnp and geant simulations of the LENZ experimental setup. We report partial differential cross sections of 16 O (𝑛,𝛼 0 ) at 𝐸 𝑛 = 3.8–15 MeV and 16 O (𝑛,𝛼 1 +𝛼 2 +𝛼 3 ) at 𝐸 𝑛 =9–15 MeV, based on the new measurement in 2021. The resonances that we observed are in good agreement with the levels in 17 O that were previously measured. The LENZ cross sections are in better agreement with the ENDF/B-VIII.0 evaluation than the with reduced cross section found in ENDF/B-VII.1 up to 6 MeV. However, the current results for 16 O (𝑛,𝛼 0 ) 13 C g.s. appear to be in the best agreement over the entire energy range with that of JENDL/AN-2005 (ENDF/B-VI.0).
Abstract not provided.
The Q=4.4398 MeV 12 C (n, n'γ) cross section was measured using a white incident neutron source through the detection of γ rays only and n–γ coincidences using a segmented liquid scintillator detector array. While the n–γ technique utilized here is more generally applicable to a wide variety of neutron scattering measurements, the γ-only technique was successfully applied to this reaction to exploit the precise time resolution and high efficiency of this detection system to yield results with unprecedented statistical precision and total uncertainties < 2 % from reaction threshold up to 16 MeV incident neutron energy, clearly resolving many features in this reaction that were previously not well known. The γ-only and n–γ results are consistent with each other for the majority of the incident energy range covered in this paper, thereby lending validation to the n–γ technique for future measurements, though significant disagreements are observed between both results and with the ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data evaluation. These differences are particularly noticeable in the recently evaluated energy range below 6.5 MeV, and also near 14 MeV where a “sawtooth”-like feature is observed similar to that in other 12 C+n reaction channels. Finally, both γ-only and n–γ results are presented here with thorough covariance derivations.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Graphics are shown for the w20_qBURST results.
The goal of this research is to develop a numerical code for translation between the current standard, Wigner-Eisenbud R-matrix parameters and a novel pole-representation of cross sections. The method follows Ducru et al. and constructs the conversion between these parametric representations of the scattering and reaction data. This pole representation, which expresses cross sections as a sum of simple poles (and their attendant residues), is examined in the context of the advantages provided by this compact, computationally efficient representation. These advantages include the ability to doppler broaden cross sections on-the-fly as well as a lower memory footprint when generating cross sections, an attractive feature to those interested in parallel GPU based Monte Carlo. Some conversion methods between R-matrix parameters and S-matrix poles have relied on curve fitting techniques. It is unknown weather these numerical methods necessarily preserve certain underlying physics properties of the standard R-matrix cross section model (such as unitarity). The direct conversion studied here aim to preserve such properties. This knowledge is of interest for future work into the generation of resonance parameter sensitivities.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
γ-ray production is the common item of interest. Inelastic n scattering cross sections are frequently the strongest contributors to γ-production cross sections.
In this work, we discover new, hitherto unknown, shadow poles in Brune’s alternative parametrization of R-matrix theory [C. R. Brune, Phys. Rev. C 66, 044611 (2002)]. Where these poles are, and how many, depends on how one continues R-matrix operators to complex wavenumbers (specially the shift S and penetration P functions). This has little consequence for the exact R-matrix formalism (past the last energy threshold), as we show one can still always fully reconstruct the scattering matrix with only the previously known alternative parameters (poles and corresponding resonance widths), for which there were as many poles as the number of levels Nλ. However, we generalize the alternative parametrization to the Reich-Moore formalism, and show that the choice of continuation is now critical as it changes the alternative parameters values (poles and residue widths are now complex). In order to establish nuclear libraries with alternative parameters, the nuclear community will thus have to decide what convention to adopt. We argue in favor of analytical continuation (against the legacy Lane and Thomas approach) in a follow-up article [P. Ducru, Phys. Rev. C, submitted (2020)]. We observe the first evidence of shadow poles in the alternative parametrization of R-matrix theory in isotope xenon 134 Xe spin-parity group J π = 1=2 (–) , and show how they indeed depend on the choice of continuation to complex wavenumbers.
Abstract not provided.
The current one-year allocation (w20 qburst) is the first year in a two year allocation of the same name. The project has supported two publications in peer-review journals, another manuscript in preparation for publication, a white paper for the Astro2020 Decadal Survey, and a number of talks (see below). Code development continues on implementing a neutrino quantum kinetic equation solver into BURST, now called QBURST. While implementing coherent and forward-scattering processes into the dynamical neutrino evolution equations, multiple numerical issues have appeared. We have remedied a number of these issues through extensive debugging and testing, which include streamlining interpolation and implementing new ODE integration techniques. Further testing is required to solve the problem at a precision of better than one part in 10 6 . We expect that we will understand the numerical difficulties and implement solutions by end of year 2021.
Abstract not provided.
This document is the final report on the status and developments of the Charged-Particle Transport (CPT) Level-2 (“CP2020”) ASC/PEM Milestone work. This section gives an overview of the CP2020 work partitioned into two subsections: 1) a summary of the code tools used for generating CP (and other) data in Section 1.2; and 2) and library data and codes access information for end users in Section 1.3. Section 2 gives an overview of the status of previous work on charged-particle (CP) nuclear data, particularly focused on the work of the FY2011 CP Level-2 Milestone. New work for CP2020 is detailed in the following Section 3. Section 4 discusses testing and validation of the evaluated and processed data for the CP2020 library. Conclusions based on the experience of this Level-2 work and the outlook for future development of CPT-relevant data are given in the final Section 5. Appendices, detailed throughout the report, are provided for further information. This report, related documentation, codes, and the CPT nuclear data libraries are available via online repository.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.