Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Park, James

Publications and source records attributed to Park, James.

Relative alignment between magnetic fields and molecular gas structure in molecular clouds

Here, we compare the structure of synthetic dust polarization with synthetic molecular line emission from radiative transfer calculations using a three-dimensional, turbulent collapsing-cloud magnetohydrodynamics simulation. The histogram of relative orientation (HRO) technique and the projected Rayleigh statistic (PRS) are considered. In our trans-Alfvénic (more strongly magnetized) simulation, there is a transition to perpendicular alignment at densities above ~4 × 10 3 cm –3 . This transition is recovered in most of our synthetic observations of optically thin molecular tracers; however, for 12 CO it does not occur and the PRS remains in parallel alignment across the whole observer space. We calculate the physical depth of the optical depth τ = 1 surface and find that for 12 CO it is largely located in front of the cloud mid-plane, suggesting that 12 CO is too optically thick and instead mainly probes low-volume density gas. In our super-Alfvénic simulation, the magnetic field becomes significantly more tangled, and all observed tracers tend towards no preference for perpendicular or parallel alignment. An observable difference in alignment between optically thin and optically thick tracers may indicate the presence of a dynamically important magnetic field, though there is some degeneracy with viewing angle. We convolve our data with a Gaussian beam and compare it with HRO results of the Vela C molecular cloud. We find good agreement between these results and our sub-Alfvénic simulations when viewed with the magnetic field in the plane of the sky (especially when sensitivity limitations are considered), though the observations are also consistent with an intermediately inclined magnetic field.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗

Measuring the Effectiveness of Human Autonomy Teaming

Human-Automation Teaming (HAT), is now recognized as a promising solution to the problems of humans managing increasingly complex work systems. A human-automation team can be defined as the interdependent coupling between one or more human operators and one or more autonomous systems requiring collaboration and coordination to accomplish system and task goals (e.g., Langan-Fox et al., 2009). In this conception, automated agents are considered team members that can operate at various levels of automation, be focused on one or more human-information-processing stages, and the interactions with human operators may be adaptable, adjustable or mixed initiative. We investigated some metrics for assessing HAT effectiveness in a demonstration of a HAT tool used by ground station operators in a Reduced Crew Operations project that was conducted at NASA Ames Human Automation Teaming Laboratory. In this paper, we focus on operator metrics of HAT effectiveness, specifically workload and operator behaviors.

measurements↗